Concept explainers
The paper “Feedback Enhances the Positive Effects and Reduces the Negative Effects of Multiple-Choice Testing” (Memory & Cognition [2008]: 604–616) describes an experiment to investigate the effects of two factors on performance on a multiple-choice exam. The response variable was the percentage correct on a multiple-choice exam and the two factors of interest were
Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the nine treatments corresponding to the nine prior study and number of choices combinations.
- a. The authors concluded that there was no interaction between prior study and number of choices. Construct a graph of the treatment means (similar to those of Figure 15.8). Does this graph support the conclusion of no interaction? Explain.
- b. The paper also included the following F statistic values for testing main effects of prior study and number of choices.
The error df was reported as 69. Carry out appropriate tests to determine if the authors’ conclusion of significant main effects for both prior study and number of choices is justified.
- c. Based on your answers from Parts (a) and (b), write a few sentences describing the effect of prior study and the effect of number of choices on percentage correct.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 15 Solutions
Bundle: Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, 5th + WebAssign Printed Access Card: Peck/Olsen/Devore. 5th Edition, Single-Term
- What is meant by the sample space of an experiment?arrow_forwardA group of psychologists recently examined the how odor influences emotion between male and female. Three groups of participants (half male, half female) were first subjected to different types of smell (pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant), and then filled out questionnaire of happiness. The data present the pattern of results obtained in the study, with higher scores indicating a higher level of happiness Odor pleasant neutral unpleasant Male n = 5 n = 5 n = 5 M = 8 M = 7 M = 0 SS = 6 SS = 5 SS = 4 Female n = 5 n = 5 n = 5 M = 7 M =2 M = 0 SS = 6 SS = 4 SS = 6 Note: grand mean =4 A) Conduct a hypotheses testing with α = .05 to evaluate the main effects and interactions (follow the four-step procedure). B) Calculate the effect size (partial η2) for the main effects and the interaction. C) Plot the cell means in a graph, with odor type on the x-axis. D) Based on the pattern of interaction shown in the graph,…arrow_forwardCorporate advertising tries to enhance the image of the corporation. A study compared two ads from two sources, the wall street journal and the national enquirer. Subjects were asked to pretend that their company was considering a major investment in performax, the fictious sportswear firm in the ads. Each subject was asked to respond to the question " How trustworthy was the source in the sportswear company ad for performax?" On a 7-point scale. Higher values indicated more trustworthiness. Here is a summary of the results. AD SOURCE. N Standard deviation Sample mean wall street journal. 66 1.50 4.77 National Enquirer 61 1.64 2.43 a) Compare the two sources of ads using a T test. Be sure to state your null and alternative hypotheses, the test statistic with degrees of freedom, the P value and your conclusion. b) Give a 95% confidence interval…arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
- College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning