Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781305506381
Author: James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 1.1CE
To determine
To describe: Whether lee entitled to erode and displace dominant firms like coach with their upscale business model.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The four-firm concentration ratios for industries X and Y are 81 percent and 74 percent, respectively, while the corresponding Herfindahl-Hirschman indexes are 3,100 and 1,600. The Dansby-Willig performance index for industry X is 0.7, while that for industry Y is 0.55. Based on this information, which would lead to the greater increase in social welfare: a slight increase in industry X’s output or a slight increase in industry Y’s output?
Consider a homogeneous good industry (such as an agricultural product) with just two firms and a total market demand Q = 400−P, so the inverse demand is P = 400 − Q. Suppose both firms have a constant marginal cost equal to $100 per unit of output and a fixed cost equal to $10,000. One simple way to depict rivalry in a duopoly (2 firms) is the Cournot model. This model is reasonable in agricultural markets where firms choose production (plantings) in advance and the market price is determined later after the crop is harvested. In the Cournot model we imagine that the two firms simultaneously choose their production or quantity, and that demand (market clearing) determines the price given each firms’ quantity.
(a) Suppose (hypothetically) that the second firm produces 0 units, and the first firm anticipates this, so the first firm is the only seller. How much will the first firm produce (in this case the first firm acts like a monopolist and sets output where MR = MC)?
Hint: The first…
Consider a homogeneous good industry (such as an agricultural product) with just two firms and a total market demand Q = 400−P, so the inverse demand is P = 400 − Q. Suppose both firms have a constant marginal cost equal to $100 per unit of output and a fixed cost equal to $10,000. One simple way to depict rivalry in a duopoly (2 firms) is the Cournot model. This model is reasonable in agricultural markets where firms choose production (plantings) in advance and the market price is determined later after the crop is harvested. In the Cournot model, we imagine that the two firms simultaneously choose their production or quantity and that demand (market clearing) determines the price given each firms’ quantity.
(a) Suppose (hypothetically) that the second firm produces 0 units, and the first firm anticipates this, so the first firm is the only seller. How much will the first firm produce (in this case the first firm acts as a monopolist and sets output where MR = MC)?
Hint: The first…
Chapter 16 Solutions
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Based on United States Census Bureau data for 2017, for the utilities (electricity and gas) industry the four firm concentration ratio (C4) is 16.2 percent and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index is 161.4. Why might the actual concentration, and therefore market power enjoyed by a specific utility company in a state, be greater than what is indicated by these numbers? These ratios are calculated for the entire country, and not for a specific city or state. Please give an explanation.arrow_forwardSuppose two brothers own identical skydiving companies but have decided to experiment with different pricing structures. The older brother’s company, Air Adventures, charges everyone the same price, while the younger brother’s company, Sky Warriors, sets its prices using a twotiered, price-discrimination model. Assuming that both companies face the same market demand curves, marginal costs, and costs of production, and wield significant market power for their service area, which of the following is most likely to occur? a. Air Adventures will generate a similar net revenue to Sky Warriors. b. Sky Warriors will generate a higher net revenue than Air Adventures. c. Sky Warriors will generate a lower net revenue than Air Adventures. d. Air Adventures will generate a higher net revenue than Sky Warriors. e. Sky Warriors will eventually switch to the Air Adventures model.arrow_forwardSmyth Industries operated as a monopolist for the past several years, earning annual profits amounting to $50 million, which it could have maintained if Jones Incorporated did not enter the market. The result of this increased competition is lower prices and lower profits; Smyth Industries now earns $10 million annually. The managers of Smyth Industries are trying to devise a plan to drive Jones Incorporated out of the market so Smyth can regain its monopoly position (and profit). One of Smyth's managers suggests pricing its product 50 percent below marginal cost for exactly one year. The estimated impact of such a move is a loss of $1 billion. Ignoring antitrust concerns, compute the present value of Smyth Industries' profits if it could have remained a monopoly when the interest rate was 5 percent. Multiple Choice $210 million $200 million $1.05 billion $100 millionarrow_forward
- A market is initially monopolized by a firm that produces the profit-maximizing quantity QM and charges the corresponding price PM on the demand curve. Seeking to end the firm’s monopoly reign of terror, the government initiates an antitrust case and eventually, through intrepid and relentless lawyering, forces a settlement in which the firm will be broken up into a duopoly (two firms competing in the market). Assume that the duopoly market outcome is closer to, but not quite at, the competitive market equilibrium. Clearly label the monopoly and duopoly outcomes on a supply and demand graph. Clearly state how the settlement affects the equilibrium price and quantity in the market. Also, clearly tabulate ΔCS, ΔPS, and ΔSS using appropriately labeled points on the graph. Is the settlement an actual Pareto improvement over the monopoly result? Is it a potential Pareto improvement? Explain. Label the efficiency gain on the graph. llustrate your answer with a graph and final steparrow_forwardYou are the manager in a market composed of eight firms, each of which has a 12.5 percent market share. In addition, each firm has a strong financial position and is located within a 100-mile radius of its competitors.Instruction: Enter your responses rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places).a. Calculate the premerger Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) for this market.b. Suppose that any two of these firms merge. What is the postmerger HHI?c. Based only on the information contained in this question and on the U.S. Department of Justice Horizontal Merger Guidelines described in this chapter, do you think the Justice Department would attempt to block a merger between any two of the firms?multiple choice It likely will not. It may, but will likely consider other factors as well. It likely will.arrow_forwardTwo firms, A and B, face an inverse market demand function of P = 1200 - 4Q. Each firm has the same cost function Ci = 20qi. Assume the A and B are Stackelberg competitors, and that A is the leader. Derive from profit functions the equilibrium prices, quantities, and profits for A and B. How does the methodology for solving the Stackelberg problem differ from the method for solving the Cournot problem? Why?arrow_forward
- You are the manager in a market composed of eight firms, each of which has a 12.5 percent market share. In addition, each firm has a strong financial position and is located within a 100-mile radius of its competitors. a. Calculate the premerger Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) for this market. b. Suppose that any two of these firms merge. What is the postmerger HHI? c. Based only on the information contained in this question and on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines described in this chapter, do you think the Justice Department (or FTC) would attempt to block a merger between any two of the firms? Explainarrow_forwardMarket demand for widgets is p = 160 - 2Q. Whether there is just one firm selling widgets or many firms selling widgets, the marginal cost and average cost is 100.Assume there are two firms selling widgets acting as Stackelberg duopolists, with Firm 1 moving first and Firm 2 following. Further assume that Firm 1's marginal profit function at its maximum is Mπ(q1) = 75 - q1, where q1 is the amount of widgets sold by Firm 1. What is the quantity sold for each firm?Options are:Firm 1 sells 0 Firms 2 sells 80Firm 1 sells 25 firm 2 sells 64.5Firm 1 sells 15, Firm 2 sells 30Firm 1 sells 7.5 Firm 2 sells 15From question 12 (Stackelberg duopolists), what is the price of widgets?Options are:1501158565arrow_forwardAn industry has four firms, each with a market share of 25 percent. There is no foreign competition, entry into the industry is difficult, and no firm is on the verge of bankruptcy. If two of the firms in the industry seek to merge, this action would most likely be opposed by the government because the Herfindahl index for the industry is Multiple Choice 2,500 and the merger would increase the index by 1000. 5,000 and the merger would increase the index by 2000. 3,000 and the merger would increase the index by 2000. 2,500 and the merger would increase the index by 1250.arrow_forward
- Choose the most appropriate answer. 1.1 Read the following extract and answer question 1.1, 1.2. Evidence of dominationBoth the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominantacross the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they haveentered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacomto provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobilemarket due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. Thishas limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able tochallenge the “cosy” market structure head-on.Source: https://techcentral.co.za/mcleod-is-wrong-about-telkom/110373/Accessed: 19/08/21 The economic argument being expressed in this extract is that of __________ and has the…arrow_forwardHi please assist me with this question. 1.1 Read the following extract and answer question 1.1, 1.2. Evidence of dominationBoth the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominant across the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they have entered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacom to provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobile market due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. This has limited their ability to compete independently – leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able to challenge the “cosy” market structure head-on.The economic argument being expressed in this extract is that of __________ and has the consequence of ______________. a) Market failure, externalities.b) Government…arrow_forwardThere are two firms A and B. Firms compete in a Cournot Duopoly in Karhide. They set quantities qA and qB. Inverse demand isP(qA +qB) = 18−qA −qB and costs are C(q) = 3∗q for both firms. Firm B is a domestic firm (in Karhide,) and firm A is a foreign firm (from Orgoreyn.) The government of Karhide engages in a strategic trade intervention by giving firm B a per unit subsidy of s. (That is, when firm B produces and sells qB units, firm B receives a payment of s ∗ qB from the government.) We begin by examining the model with an unspecified s ≥ 0. A)Find profit functions for both firms. B)Use first order conditions to find each firm’s best response function.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningSurvey of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305260948Author:Irvin B. TuckerPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Survey of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305260948
Author:Irvin B. Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning