HORNGRENS COST ACCOUNTING W/ACCESS
16th Edition
ISBN: 9781323687604
Author: Datar
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Textbook Question
Chapter 16, Problem 16.20MCQ
Earl’s Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately $9,000 in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for $20,000 while B grade sells for $40,000. After an additional investment of $10,000 after splitoff, $3,000 for B grade and $7,000 for A-1, both the products sell for $50,000. What is the difference in allocated costs for the A-1 product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach?
- 1. A-1 Fancy has $1,300 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
- 2. A-1 Fancy has $1,300 less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
- 3. A-1 Fancy has $1,500 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
- 4. A-1 Fancy has $1,500 less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Earl’s Hurricane Lamp oil company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately $9000 in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for $20,000 while B grade sells for $40,000.After an additional investment of $10,000 after splitoff,$3000 for B grade and $7000 for A-1, both the products sell for $50,000.What is the difference in allocated costs for the A-1 product assuming applications of the net realizable value at splitoff approach?
A-1 Fancy has $1,300 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales at splitoff approach.
A-1 Fancy has $1,300 less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales at splitoff approach.
A-1 Fancy has $1,500 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales at splitoff approach.
A-1 Fancy has $1,500 less joint costs allocated…
Earl’s Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately $9,000 in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff or the net realizable value approach. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for $20,000 while B grade sells for $40,000. After an additional investment of $10,000 after splitoff, $3,000 for B grade and $7,000 for A-1, both the products sell for $50,000. What is the difference in allocated costs for the A-1 product assuming applications of the net realizable value and the net realizable value at splitoff approach?
1. A-1 Fancy has $1,300 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
2. A-1 Fancy has $1,300 less joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at splitoff approach.
3. A-1 Fancy has $1,500 more joint costs allocated to it under the net realizable value approach than the sales value at…
Earl’s Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately $9,000 in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for $20,000 while B grade sells for $40,000. After an additional investment of $10,000 after splitoff, $3,000 for B grade and $7,000 for A-1, both the products sell for $50,000. Use relative sales value at split off to allocate joint costs to A-1 and B grade
Group of answer choices
a. A-1: $9,000 B grade: $0
b. A-1: $3,000 B grade: $6,000
c. A-1: $4,500 B grade: $4,500
d. A-1: $6,000 B grade: $3,000
Chapter 16 Solutions
HORNGRENS COST ACCOUNTING W/ACCESS
Ch. 16 - Give two examples of industries in which joint...Ch. 16 - What is a joint cost? What is a separable cost?Ch. 16 - Distinguish between a joint product and a...Ch. 16 - Why might the number of products in a joint-cost...Ch. 16 - Provide three reasons for allocating joint costs...Ch. 16 - Why does the sales value at splitoff method use...Ch. 16 - Prob. 16.7QCh. 16 - Distinguish between the sales value at splitoff...Ch. 16 - Give two limitations of the physical-measure...Ch. 16 - How might a company simplify its use of the NRV...
Ch. 16 - Why is the constant gross-margin percentage NRV...Ch. 16 - Managers must decide whether a product should be...Ch. 16 - Prob. 16.13QCh. 16 - Describe two major methods to account for...Ch. 16 - Why might managers seeking a monthly bonus based...Ch. 16 - Prob. 16.16MCQCh. 16 - Joint costs of 8,000 are incurred to process X and...Ch. 16 - Houston Corporation has two products, Astros and...Ch. 16 - Dallas Company produces joint products, TomL and...Ch. 16 - Earls Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1...Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation, insurance settlement....Ch. 16 - Joint products and byproducts (continuation of...Ch. 16 - Net realizable value method. Sweeney Company is...Ch. 16 - Alternative joint-cost-allocation methods,...Ch. 16 - Alternative methods of joint-cost allocation,...Ch. 16 - Prob. 16.26ECh. 16 - Joint-cost allocation, sales value, physical...Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation: Sell immediately or process...Ch. 16 - Accounting for a main product and a byproduct....Ch. 16 - Joint costs and decision making. Jack Bibby is a...Ch. 16 - Joint costs and byproducts. (W. Crum adapted)...Ch. 16 - Methods of joint-cost allocation, ending...Ch. 16 - Alternative methods of joint-cost allocation,...Ch. 16 - Comparison of alternative joint-cost-allocation...Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation, process further or sell....Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation. SW Flour Company buys 1...Ch. 16 - Further processing decision (continuation of...Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation with a byproduct. The...Ch. 16 - Byproduct-costing journal entries (continuation of...Ch. 16 - Joint-cost allocation, process further or sell....Ch. 16 - Prob. 16.41PCh. 16 - Prob. 16.42PCh. 16 - Methods of joint-cost allocation, comprehensive....
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Morrill Company produces two different types of gauges: a density gauge and a thickness gauge. The segmented income statement for a typical quarter follows. Includes depreciation. The density gauge uses a subassembly that is purchased from an external supplier for 25 per unit. Each quarter, 2,000 subassemblies are purchased. All units produced are sold, and there are no ending inventories of subassemblies. Morrill is considering making the subassembly rather than buying it. Unit-level variable manufacturing costs are as follows: No significant non-unit-level costs are incurred. Morrill is considering two alternatives to supply the productive capacity for the subassembly. 1. Lease the needed space and equipment at a cost of 27,000 per quarter for the space and 10,000 per quarter for a supervisor. There are no other fixed expenses. 2. Drop the thickness gauge. The equipment could be adapted with virtually no cost and the existing space utilized to produce the subassembly. The direct fixed expenses, including supervision, would be 38,000, 8,000 of which is depreciation on equipment. If the thickness gauge is dropped, sales of the density gauge will not be affected. Required: 1. Should Morrill Company make or buy the subassembly? If it makes the subassembly, which alternative should be chosen? Explain and provide supporting computations. 2. Suppose that dropping the thickness gauge will decrease sales of the density gauge by 10 percent. What effect does this have on the decision? 3. Assume that dropping the thickness gauge decreases sales of the density gauge by 10 percent and that 2,800 subassemblies are required per quarter. As before, assume that there are no ending inventories of subassemblies and that all units produced are sold. Assume also that the per-unit sales price and variable costs are the same as in Requirement 1. Include the leasing alternative in your consideration. Now, what is the correct decision?arrow_forwardSell at Split-Off or Process Further Eunice Company produces two products from a joint process. Joint costs are 70,000 for one batch, which yields 1,000 liters of germain and 4,000 liters of hastain. Germain can be sold at the split-off point for 24 or be processed further, into geraiten, at a manufacturing cost of 4,100 (for the 1,000 liters) and sold for 33 per liter. If geraiten is sold, additional distribution costs of 0.80 per liter and sales commissions of 10% of sales will be incurred. In addition, Eunices legal department is concerned about potential liability issues with geraitenissues that do not arise with germain. Required: 1. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Considering only gross profit, should germain be sold at the split-off point or processed further? 2. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Taking a value-chain approach (by considering distribution, marketing, and after-the-sale costs), determine whether or not germain should be processed into geraiten.arrow_forwardLeMoyne Manufacturing Inc.’s joint cost of producing 2,000 units of Product X, 1,000 units of Product Y, and 1,000 units of Product Z is $50,000. The unit sales values of the three products at the split-off point are Product X–$30, Product Y–$100, and Product Z–$90. Ending inventories include 200 units of Product X, 300 units of Product Y, and 100 units of Product Z. Compute the amount of joint cost that would be included in the ending inventory valuation of the three products on the basis of their sales values at split-off. Assume that Product Z can be sold for $120 a unit if it is processed after split-off at a cost of $10 a unit. Compute the amount of joint cost that would be included in the ending inventory valuation of the three products on the basis of their net realizable values.arrow_forward
- Sell or Process Further, Basic Analysis Shenista Inc. produces four products (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta) from a common input. The joint costs for a typical quarter follow: The revenues from each product are as follows: Alpha, 100,000; Beta, 93,000; Gamma, 30,000; and Delta, 40,000. Management is considering processing Delta beyond the split-off point, which would increase the sales value of Delta to 75,000. However, to process Delta further means that the company must rent some special equipment that costs 15,400 per quarter. Additional materials and labor also needed will cost 8,500 per quarter. Required: 1. What is the operating profit earned by the four products for one quarter? 2. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Should the division process Delta further or sell it at split-off? What is the effect of the decision on quarterly operating profit?arrow_forwardMorris Industries manufactures and sells three products (AA, BB, and CC). The sales price and unit variable cost for the three products are as follows: Their sales mix s reflected as a ratio of 5:3:2. Annual fixed costs shared by the three products are $25,000 per year. What are total variable costs for Morris with their current product mix? Calculate the number of units of each product that will need to be sold in order for Morris to break even. What is their break-even point in sales dollars? Using an income statement format, prove that this is the break-even point.arrow_forwardGelbart Company manufactures gas grills. Fixed costs amount to 16,335,000 per year. Variable costs per gas grill are 225, and the average price per gas grill is 600. Required: 1. How many gas grills must Gelbart Company sell to break even? 2. If Gelbart Company sells 46,775 gas grills in a year, what is the operating income? 3. If Gelbart Companys variable costs increase to 240 per grill while the price and fixed costs remain unchanged, what is the new break-even point?arrow_forward
- Laramie Industries produces two joint products, H and C. Prior to the split-off point, the company incurred costs of $66,000. Product H weighs 44 pounds and product C weighs 66 pounds. Product H sells for $250 per pound and product C sells for $295 per pound. Based on a physical measure of output, allocate joint costs to products H and C.arrow_forwardTucariz Company processes Duo into two joint products, Big and Mini. Duo is purchased in 1,000-gallon drums for 2.000. Processing costs are 3,000 to process the 1,000 gallons of Duointo 800 gallons of Big and 200 gallons of Mini. The selling price is 9 per gallon for Big and4 per gallon for Mini. If the physical units method is used to allocate joint costs to the finalproducts, the total cost allocated to produce Mini is: a. 500. b. 4,000. c. 1,000. d. 4,500.arrow_forwardPacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were 50,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, 18,000; unders, 23,040. Overs sell for 2.00 per unit; unders sell for 3.14 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the 50,000 joint costs using the estimated net realizable value method. 2. Suppose that overs could be sold at the split-off point for 1.80 per unit. Should Pacheco sell overs at split-off or process them further? Show supporting computations.arrow_forward
- Banyan Industries has two divisions, a tax rate of 30%, and a minimum rate of return of 20%. Division A has a weighted average cost of Capital of 9.5% and is looking at a new project that will generate a profit of $1,200,000 from a machine that costs $4,000,000. Division B has a weighted average cost of capital of 9.5% and is looking at a new project that will generate a profit of $1,350,000 from a machine that costs $5,000.000. A. Calculate the EVA for each of Banyans divisions. B. Calculate the RI for each of Banyans division. C. If Banyan uses EVA to evaluate the projects, which division has the better project and by how much? D. If Banyan uses RI, which division has the better project and by how much? E. What are some of the reasons for the similarity or difference that you found in the use of EVA versus RI?arrow_forwardUsing data from the above question calculate the net realizable value at splitoff approach? Earl’s Hurricane Lamp Oil Company produces both A-1 Fancy and B Grade Oil. There are approximately $9,000 in joint costs that Earl may allocate using the relative sales value at splitoff. Before splitoff, A-1 sells for $20,000 while B grade sells for $40,000. After an additional investment of $10,000 after splitoff, $3,000 for B grade and $7,000 for A-1, both the products sell for $50,000. Group of answer choices a. A-1: $4,300 B grade: $4,700 b. A-1: $0 B grade: $9,000 c. A-1: $4,500 B grade: $4,500 d. A-1: $6,000 B grade: $3,000arrow_forwardThe Camp Corporation manufactures two products out of a joint process— Coma and Ultra. The joint costs incurred are Php250,000 for a standard production that generates 120,000 gallons of Coma and 80,000 gallons of Ultra. Coma sells for Php2.00 per gallon, while Ultra sells for Php3.25 per gallon. If there are no additional processing costs incurred after the split-off point, the amount of joint cost of each production allocated to Coma by the quantitative unit method is?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Cost AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305087408Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. MitchellPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeFinancial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Principles of Cost Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781305087408
Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337902663
Author:WARREN, Carl S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Incremental Analysis - Sell or Process Further; Author: Melissa Shirah;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D6QnBt5KPk;License: Standard Youtube License