Study Guide for Microeconomics
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134741123
Author: Robert Pindyck, Daniel Rubinfeld
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 2RQ
To determine
Endowment effect.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What is agent theory?
Rosa received a corgi pillow as a raffle prize; she would have been willing to pay $18 to buy it herself. Based on the endowment effect, we would expect Rosa to be willing to sell the pillow.
Refer to figure. Suppose the consumer is endowed with 10 units of orange and consumes 5 units of apple. The price of the apple decreases and at the new price the consumer consumes 9 units of apple. The change in the demand for apples due to the endowment effect is equal to_____
Chapter 19 Solutions
Study Guide for Microeconomics
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) c) Assume that Kim has preferences Uk (Xk, Yk) = 3Xk + 3Yk and Jung has preferences Uj (Xj, Yj) = Xj + 3Yj. Will Kim and Jung trade? Calculate the general equilibrium allocation for Kim and Jung. Compute the utility at the endowment point and at the general equilibrium allocation. Is the new allocation on the contract curve?arrow_forwardwhat does it mean when we say changing the endowment? (in economics term)arrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) d) Assume that a social planner could redistribute initial wealth (the amounts of ? and ? that Kim and Jung have). Can they reallocate resources so that Kim and Jung reach the allocation (Xk, Yk) = (20,20) and (Xj, Yj) = (20,20) as a general equilibrium (i.e. post-trade) allocation? Can the social planner redistribute resources to make the allocation where Jung owns all the resources in the economy a general equilibrium allocation?arrow_forward
- What is the Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardThe narrator in the Planet Money Video poses this question: Is our shirt providing opportunities for people like Jasmine, or is it taking advantage of a desperate population? How do you think a Dependency Theorist would answer this question? Explain why.arrow_forwardI need help with this homework problem. Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = (X^1/2)*(Y^1/2) UB(X,Y) = X + Y The initial endowments are: A: X = 8; Y = 3 B: X = 4; Y = 5 What is the marginal rate of substitution for consumer A at the initial allocation? What is the marginal rate of substitution for consumer B at the initial allocation? Is the initial allocation Pareto Efficient?arrow_forward
- In economics, what is an example of selection?arrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) a) Illustrate the initial endowment in an Edgeworth box. Clearly label the axes and explain the dimensions of the box. Show the indifference curve each of them is on at the endowment point. b) Consider an allocation where Kim gets (xk, yk) = (40,40) and Jung gets the remaining Ferraris and VR headsets. Show where this point is in the Edgeworth box. Is this allocation Pareto efficient? Is it equitable? How likely is this to arise in practice?arrow_forwardThis is an easy question from economics NASH EQUILIBRIUMarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning