MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
16th Edition
ISBN: 9781260936322
Author: Garrison
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 2, Problem 16P
PROBLEM 2—16 Plantwide Predetermined
Landen Corporation uses a job-order costing system. At the beginning of the year, the company made the following estimates:
| Direct labor-hours required to support estimated production | 140,000 |
| Machine-hours required to support estimated production | 70,000 |
| Fixed manufacturing overhead cost | $784,000 |
| Variable manufacturing overhead cost per direct labor-hour | $2.00 |
| Variable manufacturing overhead cost per machine-hour | $4.00 |
During the year, Job 550 was started and completed. The following information is available with respect to this job:
| Direct materials | $175 |
| Direct labor cost | $225 |
| Direct labor-hours | 15 |
| Machine-hours | 5 |
Required:
- Assume that Landen has historically used a plantwide predetermined overhead rate with direct labor-hours as the allocation base. Under this approach:
- Compute the planide predetermined overhead rate.
- Compute the total
manufacturing cost of Job 550. - If Landen uses a markup percentage of 200% of its total manufacturing cost, what selling price would it establish for Job 550?
- Assume that Landen’s controller believes that machine-hours is a better allocation base than direct labor-hours. Under this approach:
- Compute the planPide predetermined overhead rate.
- Compute the total manufacturing cost of Job 550.
- If Landen uses a markup percentage of 200% of its total manufacturing cost, what selling price would it establish for Job 550?
- Assume that Landen’s controller is right about machine-hours being a more accurate overhead cost allocation base than direct labor-hours. If the company continues to use direct labor-hours as its only overhead cost allocation base what implications does this have for pricing jobs such as Job 550?
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 2 Solutions
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
Ch. 2.A - EXERCISE 2A-1 Activity-Based Absorption Costing...Ch. 2.A - EXERCISE 2A-2 Activity-Based Absorption Costing as...Ch. 2.A - EXERCISE 2A-3 Activity-Based Absorption Costing as...Ch. 2.A - PROBLEM 2A-4 Activity-Based Absorption Costing as...Ch. 2.A - Prob. 5PCh. 2.A -
CASE 2A-6 Activity-Based Absorption Costing and...Ch. 2.B - EXERCISE 2B-1 Overhead Rate Based on Capacity...Ch. 2.B - EXERCISE 2B-2 Overhead Rates and Capacity Issues...Ch. 2.B - Prob. 3PCh. 2.B - Prob. 4C
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1QCh. 2 - What is absorption costing?Ch. 2 - What is normal costing?Ch. 2 - How is the unit product cost of a job calculated?
Ch. 2 - Explain the four-step process used to compute a...Ch. 2 - What is the purpose of the job cost sheet in a...Ch. 2 - Explain why some production costs must be assigned...Ch. 2 - Why do companies use predetermined overhead rates...Ch. 2 - What factors should be considered in selecting an...Ch. 2 - If a company fully allocates all of its overhead...Ch. 2 - Would you expect the amount of applied overhead...Ch. 2 - Prob. 12QCh. 2 - What is a plantwide overhead rate? Whyare multiple...Ch. 2 - This Excel worksheet relates to the Dickson...Ch. 2 - This Excel worksheet relates to the Dickson...Ch. 2 - Prob. 3AECh. 2 - This Excel worksheet relates to the Dickson...Ch. 2 - Prob. 1F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 2F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 3F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 4F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 5F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 6F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 7F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 8F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 9F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 10F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 11F15Ch. 2 - Sweeten Company had no jobs in progress at the...Ch. 2 - Prob. 13F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 14F15Ch. 2 - Prob. 15F15Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 2-1 Compute a Predetermined Overhead Rate...Ch. 2 - Prob. 2ECh. 2 - EXERCISE 2–3 Computing Total Job Costs and Unit...Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 24 Computing Total Job Costs and Unit...Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 2-5 Computing Total Job Costs and Unit...Ch. 2 - Prob. 6ECh. 2 - EXERCISE 2-7 Job-Order Costing; Working Backwards...Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 2-8 Applying Overhead Cost; Computing...Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 2–9 Job-Order Costing and Decision Making...Ch. 2 - Prob. 10ECh. 2 - Prob. 11ECh. 2 - Prob. 12ECh. 2 - EXERCISE 2—13 Departmental Predetermined Overhead...Ch. 2 - EXERCISE 214 Job-Orders Costing for a Service...Ch. 2 - Prob. 15ECh. 2 - PROBLEM 2—16 Plantwide Predetermined Overhead...Ch. 2 - PROBLEM 217 Plantwide and Departmental...Ch. 2 - Prob. 18PCh. 2 - Prob. 19PCh. 2 - Prob. 20PCh. 2 - PROBLEM 2-21 Plant wide Versus Multiple...Ch. 2 - CASE 2-22 Plantwide versus Departmental Overhead...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Factory overhead rate Fabricator Inc., a specialized equipment manufacturer, uses a job order cost system. The overhead is allocated to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The overhead rate is now $3,000 per direct labor hour. The design engineer thinks that this is illogical. The design engineer has stated the following: Our accounting system doesn't make any sense to me. It tells me that every labor hour carries an additional burden of $3,000. This means that while direct labor makes up only 5% of our total product cost, it drives all our costs. In addition, these rates give my design engineers incentives to "design out" direct labor by using machine technology. Yet, over the past years as we have had less and less direct labor, the overhead rate keeps going up and up. I won't be surprised if next year the rate is $4,000 per direct labor hour. I'm also concerned because small errors in our estimates of the direct labor content can have a large impact on our estimated costs. Just a 30~minute error in our estimate of assembly time is worth $ 1,500. Small mistakes in our direct labor time estimates really swing our bids around. I think this puts us at a disadvantage when we are going after business. What do you think is a possible solution?arrow_forwardFactory overhead rate Fabricator Inc., a specialized equipment manufacturer, uses a job order cost system. The overhead is allocated to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The overhead rate is now $3,000 per direct labor hour. The design engineer thinks that this is illogical. The design engineer has stated the following: Our accounting system doesn't make any sense to me. It tells me that every labor hour carries an additional burden of $3,000. This means that while direct labor makes up only 5% of our total product cost, it drives all our costs. In addition, these rates give my design engineers incentives to "design out" direct labor by using machine technology. Yet, over the past years as we have had less and less direct labor, the overhead rate keeps going up and up. I won't be surprised if next year the rate is $4,000 per direct labor hour. I'm also concerned because small errors in our estimates of the direct labor content can have a large impact on our estimated costs. Just a 30~minute error in our estimate of assembly time is worth $ 1,500. Small mistakes in our direct labor time estimates really swing our bids around. I think this puts us at a disadvantage when we are going after business. What did the engineer mean about the large overhead rate being a disadvantage when plating bids and seeking new business?arrow_forwardActivity-based department rate product costing and product cost distortions Big Sound Inc. manufactures two products: receivers and loud-speakers. The factory overhead incurred is as follows: Indirect labor 400,400 Cutting Department 198,800 Finishing Department 114,800 Total 714,000 The activity base associated with the two production departments is direct labor hours. The indirect labor can be assigned to two different activities as follows: Activity Budgeted Activity Cost Activity Base Setup 138,600 Number of setup Quality Control 261,800 Number of inspections Total 400,400 The activity-base usage quantities and units produced for the two products follow: Number o Setup Number of Inspections Direct Labor HoursSubassembly Direct Labor HoursFinal Assembly Units Produced Snowboards 430 5,000 4,000 2,000 6,000 Skis _70 2,500 2,000 4,000 6,000 Total 500 7,500 6,000 6,000 12,000 Instructions 1. Determine the factory overhead rates under the multiple production department rate method. Assume that indirect labor is associated with the production departments, so that the total factory overhead is 5420,000 and 294,000 for the Subassembly and Final Assembly departments, respectively. 2. Determine the total and per-unit factory overhead costs allocated to each product, using the multiple production department overhead rates in (1). 3. Determine the activity rates, assuming that the indirect labor is associated with activities rather than with the production departments. 4. Determine the total and per-unit cost assigned to each product under activity-based costing. 5. Explain the difference in the per-unit overhead allocated to each product under the multiple production department factory overhead rate and activity-based costing methods.arrow_forward
- Multiple production department factory overhead rates The management of Orange County Chrome Company, described in Problem 1A, now plans to use the multiple production department factory overhead rate method. The total factory overhead associated with each department is as follows: Stamping Department 115,200 Plating Department 105,600 Total 220,800 Instructions 1. Determine the multiple production department factory overhead rates, using direct labor hours for the Stamping Department and machine hours for the Plating Department. 2. Determine the product factory- overhead costs, using the multiple production department rates in (1).arrow_forwardActivity-based costing and product cost distortion The management of Four Finger Appliance Company in Exercise 14 has asked you to u.sc activity-based costing instead of direct labor hours to allocate factory overhead costs to the two products. You have determined that 81,000 of factory overhead from each of the production departments can be associated with setup activity (162,000 in total). Company records indicate that blenders required 135 setups, while the toaster ovens required only 45 setups. Each product has a production volume of 7,500 units. A. Determine the three activity rates (assembly, test and pack, and setup). B. Determine the total factory overhead and factory overhead per unit allocated to each product using the activity rates in (A).arrow_forwardFactory overhead rate Salvo Inc., a specialized equipment manufacturer, uses a job order costing system. The overhead is allocated to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The overhead rate is now 1,500 per direct labor hour. The design engineer thinks that this is illogical. The design engineer has stated the following: Our accounting system doesnt make any sense to me. It tells me that every labor hour carries an additional burden of 1,500. This means that direct labor makes up only 6% of our total product cost, yet it drives all our costs. In addition, these rates give my design engineers incentives to design out direct labor by using machine technology. Yet, over the past years as we have had less and less direct labor, the overhead rate keeps going up and up. I wont be surprised if next year the rate is 2,000 per direct labor hour. Im also concerned because small errors in our estimates of the direct labor content can have a large impact on our estimated costs. Just a 30-minute error in our estimate of assembly time is worth 750. Small mistakes in our direct labor time estimates really swing our bids around. I think this puts us at a disadvantage when we are going after business. 1. What is the engineer's concern about the overhead rate going up and up? 2. What did the engineer mean about the large overhead rate being a disadvantage when placing bids and seeking new business? 3. What do you think is a possible solution?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Financial & Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781285866307Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting (Text Only)AccountingISBN:9781285743615Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning
Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)AccountingISBN:9781305961883Author:Carl WarrenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Financial & Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337119207Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning
Financial & Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781285866307
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting (Text Only)
Accounting
ISBN:9781285743615
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)
Accounting
ISBN:9781305961883
Author:Carl Warren
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Financial & Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337119207
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Cost Classifications - Managerial Accounting- Fixed Costs Variable Costs Direct & Indirect Costs; Author: Accounting Instruction, Help, & How To;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQd1_gEF1yM;License: Standard Youtube License