LSC MICROECONOMICS
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260186697
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 26, Problem 8DQ
To determine
The effectiveness of the artificial trade barriers to maintain the full employment.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
In Country A, the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 11 lamps. In Country B, the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 15 lamps. Which country has a comparative advantage in making bicycles? LO26.2 a. Country A. b. Country B
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products— baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fishIn what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1 2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata:
Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish
Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 7 cans tuna fish
a. In what product should each nation specialize?
Canswicki should produce _____- , and Tunata should produce _____
b. Would the following terms of trade be acceptable to both nations?
i. 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish: yes or no
ii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 8 cans tuna fish: yes or no
iii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 5.5 cans tuna fish: yes or no
Chapter 26 Solutions
LSC MICROECONOMICS
Ch. 26.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 26 - Prob. 1DQCh. 26 - Prob. 2DQCh. 26 - Prob. 3DQCh. 26 - Prob. 4DQCh. 26 - Prob. 5DQCh. 26 - Prob. 6DQ
Ch. 26 - Prob. 7DQCh. 26 - Prob. 8DQCh. 26 - Prob. 9DQCh. 26 - Prob. 10DQCh. 26 - Prob. 11DQCh. 26 - Prob. 12DQCh. 26 - Prob. 13DQCh. 26 - Prob. 14DQCh. 26 - Prob. 1RQCh. 26 - Prob. 2RQCh. 26 - Prob. 3RQCh. 26 - Prob. 4RQCh. 26 - Prob. 5RQCh. 26 - Prob. 6RQCh. 26 - Prob. 7RQCh. 26 - Prob. 8RQCh. 26 - Prob. 9RQCh. 26 - Prob. 10RQCh. 26 - Prob. 11RQCh. 26 - Prob. 12RQCh. 26 - Prob. 13RQCh. 26 - Prob. 1PCh. 26 - Prob. 2PCh. 26 - Prob. 3PCh. 26 - Prob. 4P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries? How would rising costs (rather than constant costs) affect the extent of specialization and trade between these two countries?arrow_forwardNow suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries. What is one potential price of metal ores in terms of trucks at which both Zimbabwe and South Africa would benefit from trade? Rank the autarkic prices and the world price of metal ores from lowest to highest.arrow_forwardAnswer th following: If Nation 2 is to enter trade. In what good will it specialize? Why? If Nation 2 is to specialize in the good of its comparative advantage, how much good X and good Y will Nation 2 produce? Suppose after specialization, Nation 2 exports 100 units of the good of its comparative advantage [your answer in 1], how much of X and Y will it consumer after trade Will Nation 2 enjoy welfare gains from trade? Provide evidencearrow_forward
- 2. In the USA 1 unit of labor can produce 50 cars while in Canada 1 unit of labor can produce5 cars. The total amount of labor in each country is L = 100. Which one of these statements iscorrect?A. Canada has comparative advantage on the production of cars.B. The USA has comparative advantage on the production of cars.C. Since their production possibility frontiers are the similar neither country has comparativeadvantage on the production of cars.D. Not enough information to answer this question.arrow_forward3. Be sure to label all points. Suppose the domestic autarky relative price M/S=1 and autarky consumption takes place at point A with (M/S) = (75, 100). Production with free trade takes place at point B with (M, S) = (100, 70). Does the country specialize in the production of M or S? The country exports 15 units of M and 45 units of S are imported. Find the consumption bundle (M, S) and label it point C. Sketch the trade triangle. What are the terms of trade? Evaluate the gains from trade in terms of M for this economy.arrow_forwardAssume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. France’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. Suppose that Germany does not specialize in the production of the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage but it opens up for trade at the autarky production level. Compare the welfare of the country with the case when country specializes.arrow_forward
- 6-Look at a country’s Terms of Trade (T.O.T.). It is assumed that when the T.O.T. value increases the country’s wellbeing goes up, and when the T.O.T. value declines, the country’s wellbeing is reduced. Do you agree??? Explain!!! Among others you stated: “Trade between countries highly depends upon terms of trade. T.O.T. has important effects on the balance of payments or on its economic growth so the T.O.T. is used to measure the wellbeing of the country.” Further down though…you refute your previous statement by saying: “But T.O.T. should not be used to calculate wellbeing as its calculation does not show the volume of export of the country, only shows relative changes between countries….”etc.arrow_forwardSuppose that the United States limits the amount of steel that can be imported from other countries. Using a PPF that puts units of steel on the horizontal axis and units of another good, such as food, on the vertical axis, explain how such a steel import quota will affect production of food and steel in the United States and alter our consumption possibilities. Will the quota make the United States better off as a whole? If not, will it make anyone in the United States better off? Explain. For 19.21, think of the PPF as that of steel produced in the United States and food produced in the United States (and not as total steel available for use in the United States)arrow_forwardHours of Labor Required to produce Cheese and Wine USA FRANCE Cheese 20 30 Wine 8 20 Show the pattern of specialization, and hence trade is beneficial to each country. If the US is endowed with 1600 units hours of labor and France 3000 labor hours, how many cheese and wine will they produce after trade begins and why? Draw the PFF for both countries and show the post-trade production points. Explain. Is it possible that the world equilibrium price to be Pc/Pw = ¾ ?Explain. Which country will gain more from this trade if Pc/Pw = 2 and why ? Explain Wage rate in France is $4 per unit hours of labor.( when calculated in dollars) What should the wage rate interval in the US be if trade is flowing between the two countries based on comparative advantage? İf the wage rate in USA is 12$ what will happen to trade pattern of the countries?arrow_forward
- Suppose that Poland and Wales both produce ale and glass. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 4 kegs of ale while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 12 kegs of ale. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing glass in the two countries, you can tell thatWales has a comparative advantage in the production of glass andPoland has a comparative advantage in the production of ale. Suppose that Poland and Wales consider trading glass and ale with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of ale for each pane of glass it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of glass for each keg of ale it exports to Poland. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of glass in terms of ale) would allow both Wales and Poland to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 8 kegs of…arrow_forwardc) Now, assume that each country has to use its own labour to transport goods from the other country. Suppose that it takes 1 worker to bring an imported unit of the good Northland specializes in, into Southland. Also, suppose that it takes 1 worker to bring an imported unit of the good Southland specialises in, into Northland. Will trade take place? Explainarrow_forward12. If the free trade price is lIP and this country imposes a trade tariff of $3, what will be the resulting net welfare loss to the economy? a)$3 b)$27 C)$13.5 d)$40.5 e)$9 13. if the free trade price is IP and this country imposes an import quota of 6 units, what will be the welfare loss to this economy? a)$3 b)$27 c)$13.5 d)$40.5 e)$18arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781285165912Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971509Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781285165912
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971509
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc