a)
Explain the statement whether it is true or false.
b)
The sum of the probabilities of collectively exhaustive events must equal to 1.
c)
Explain whether the given statement is true or false.
d)
Explain whether the given statement which state about the probability is true or false.
e)
Check the statement; If an event and its complement are equally likely to occur, the probability of that event must be 0.5 is true or false.
f)
Check the statement; If A and B are independent, then A and B must be independent is true or false.
g)
Check the statement; If A and B are mutually exclusive, then
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 3 Solutions
Statistics for Business and Economics plus MyLab Statistics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (8th Edition)
- According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, about 2% of new US car sales are electric vehicles (data from Edison Electric Institute reported by Jinjoo Lee, "Peak Oil? Not This Year. Or This Decade," January 9, 2021 pg. B12). Suppose a company has 111 employees who drive new cars (separately) to work each day. What is the probability that at least one of them will drive an electric car? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardRefer to Table 3.10.What is the joint probability of “middle income” and “never”?arrow_forwardGive typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose that the government must undertake an irreversible policy decision regarding the extent of air pollution regulation. The government is making this decision in a situation of uncertainty, however. In particular, there is some probability p that the benefits will remain the same as they are this year for all future years, but there is some probability 1 - p that benefits will be less in all future years. If we take into consideration the multiperiod aspects, should we err on the side of overregulation or underregulation, compared to what we would do in a single-period choice?arrow_forward
- Farmer Brown faces a 25% chance of there being a year with prolongeddrought, with zero yields and zero profit, and he faces a 75% chance of a normal year, with good yields and$100,000 profit. These probabilities are well-known. Suppose that an insurance company offered a droughtinsurance policy that pays the farmer $100,000 if a prolonged drought occurs. Assume that the farmer’sutility function is u(c) = ln(c). He has initial wealth of $40,000. What is the economic intuition on why X > Y? Confine your answer to at most three sentences.arrow_forward2. “A risk-averse individual will always full insure, meaning that uncertainty is irrelevant.” Discuss this comment using relevant model(s) studied in the unit.arrow_forwardRefer to Table 3.10.What is the joint probability of “low income” and “regular”?arrow_forward
- Suppose that an individual is just willing to accept a gamble to win or lose $1000 if the probability ofwinning is 0.6. Suppose that the utility gained if the individual wins is 100 utils. What is expected gains/loss.arrow_forwardSuppose that an individual is just willing to accept a gamble to win or lose $1000 if the probability ofwinning is 0.6. Suppose that the utility gained if the individual wins is 100 utils. How much utility does one lose if one loses the gamble?arrow_forwardADVERSE SELECTIONSomet Health Insurance Company wants to sell a health insurance product for $700 permonth. There is no requirement for healthy people to have insurance coverage. Thecompany conducts a survey to see how different populations respond to the proposed cost.People with no illnesses and disabilities, generally the young and healthy, respond that theydo not spend $700 on healthcare in an entire year, and most feel they would not waste somuch money on premiums when the chance of needing surgery or expensive healthcaretreatments is so small. However, older, sicker people think that $700 per month is a greatdeal, as most of them spend far in excess of this amount on healthcare. It seems like agreat deal for them. What will happen to the costs of the health insurance if only the older, sicker peopleenroll?arrow_forward
- __ 2. According to the classical definition of probability a. All the events are equally likely. b. The probability is based on hunches. c. Divide the number of successes by the number of failures. d. One outcome is exactly twice the other.arrow_forward6.33 Statistics released by the National HighwayTraffic Safety Administration and the National SafetyCouncil show that on an average weekend night, 1 outof every 10 drivers on the road is drunk. If 400 driversare randomly checked next Saturday night, what is theprobability that the number of drunk drivers will be(a) less than 32?(b) more than 49?(c) at least 35 but less than 47?arrow_forward1 Question 2. Suppose that there is one risk free asset with return rf and one risky asset with normally distributed returns, r ∼ N(µ, σ2). The investor has an expected utility maximizer with the CARA utility u(r) = −e −Ar. Write down the investor’s maximization problem of choosing α fraction of his wealth will be invested in the risky asset Find the optimal fraction of wealth that the investor will invest in the risky asset α∗Hint: Use the fact that if a random variable x is distributed normally with mean µx and variance σ2x , then for any constant α, What happens to the optimal fraction of wealth that the investor will invest in the risky asset as the risk aversion A increases? Explain the intuition behind your result.arrow_forward