Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259290619
Author: Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 20PAA
To determine
(a)
The graphical representation of the profit function, and to analyze the effect on output and profits if a company compensates sales managers solely based on output.
To determine
(b)
To analyze:
The effect on output and profits if a company compensates sales managers solely based on profits.
To determine
(c)
To analyze the effect on output and profits if a company compensates sales managers based on profits and output.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider the indirect utility function: v(p1; p2; m) = m /(p1 + p2). What is the Hicksian demand function?
A manufacturer of microwaves has discovered that male shoppers, on average, have lower values for microwave ovens than female shoppers. Additionally, male shoppers attribute almost no extra value to an auto-defrost feature, while female shoppers, on average, value the auto-defrost feature. The manufacturer has determined that men value a simple microwave at $70 and one with auto- defrost at $80, while women value a simple microwave at $80 and one with auto-defrost at $150. If there is an equal number of men and women, what pricing strategy will yield the greatest revenue?
Suppose a student asks an artificial intelligence (Al) the following question: "If there were a perfectly competitive insurance market in which each household could buy and sell insurance for any realized value of future stochastic income without any financial constraints other than the flow-of-funds constraint, what condition would each household's consumption satisfy in equilibrium?"
Suppose the Al replies as follows: "In a perfectly competitive insurance market, households would face the same price for each insurance policy. The price of each insurance policy would equal the expected present discounted value of the future benefit of the policy in each possible state of the world. Each household would buy and sell insurance policies to maximize its expected utility, subject to its flow-of-funds constraint. This implies that _______would be equalized across households in each period in equilibrium, regardless of the realization of stochastic income."Answer the following…
Chapter 4 Solutions
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Which of the following statements is true? Select one or more options: -If two different individuals have exactly the same budget constraint but different preferences (different appearance of the indifference curves) then they will have different equilibrium conditions for optimal choice -The marginal substitution ratio is always equal to 1 for perfect substitutes -If item X costs SEK 10, item Y costs SEK 20 and if the marginal benefit for X is 20 and the marginal benefit for Y is 30, then the individual should buy more of Y and less of X -In the case of a corner solution for an individual, the marginal substitution ratio for two goods is not equal to the relative price of the two goodsarrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is true? Select one or more options: a-If two different individuals have exactly the same budget constraint but different preferences (different appearance of the indifference curves) then they will have different equilibrium conditions for optimal choice b-The marginal substitution ratio is always equal to 1 for perfect substitutes c-If item X costs SEK 10, item Y costs SEK 20 and if the marginal benefit for X is 20 and the marginal benefit for Y is 30, then the individual should buy more of Y and less of X d-In the case of a corner solution for an individual, the marginal substitution ratio for two goods is not equal to the relative price of the two goodsarrow_forwardMany police officer positions require the applicant to have a college degree, even though the tasks of a police officer rarely call upon college course material. Suppose two individuals who do not have college degrees are considering applying to the police force. Ginny is considering applying for an officer position and plans on working for the police force for a period of time, over which she would earn approximately $500,000 (in present discounted value) in earnings while in the position. Kenji is also considering applying, and plans on working as an officer for a period of time, over which he would earn approximately $10,000 (in present discounted value) in lifetime earnings while in the position. Also suppose that present value of obtaining a college degree, which is required to submit a job application to the police department, is $100,000. Use the following table to indicate whether each individual would likely apply, or not, given the cost of obtaining a college degree.…arrow_forward
- Suppose that the indirect utility function takes the form(p, y) = f (p)y. What is the form of the expenditure function? What is the form of the indirect compensation function, p(p; q, y) in terms of the function f (.) and y?arrow_forwardImagine a signaling model where there are two types of workers, low-productivity workers with a productivity of 10, and high-productivity workers with a productivity of 30. The proportion of low-productivity workers is .5. Firms are competitive and obtain profit equal to the productivity of the worker they hire. Workers can obtain one of three levels of education: e1, e2, and e3. Workers get utility equal to their wage minus the cost of education. Wages must be between 10 and 30. The cost of getting an education for low-productivity workers is e1 = 0, e2 = 9, e3 = 18. The cost of getting an education for high-productivity workers is e1 = 0, e2 =4, e3 = 8. Are there any separating equilibria in this model? If so, find them, if not show why they do not exist.arrow_forwardImagine a signaling model where there are two types of workers, low-productivity workers with a productivity of 10, and high-productivity workers with a productivity of 30. The proportion of low-productivity workers is .5. Firms are competitive and obtain profit equal to the productivity of the worker they hire. Workers can obtain one of three levels of education: e1, e2, and e3. Workers get utility equal to their wage minus the cost of education. Wages must be between 10 and 30. The cost of getting an education for low-productivity workers is e1 = 0, e2 = 9, e3 = 18. The cost of getting an education for high-productivity workers is e1 = 0, e2 =4, e3 = 8. A) Are there any pooling equilibria in this model? If so find all of them, if not, show why they do not exist.arrow_forward
- Consider a couple whose behaviour follows the unitary household model. Their preferences can be represented by the utility function: U(CM; CH) = min (CM, CH), where CM, denotes market goods and CH denotes home production. Each spouse can work up to 50 hours per week, and those 50 hours can be divided between market work and home production. Joe and Anna are each paid £20 per hour for market work. Joe produces £20 of home production per hour, while Anna produces £30 per hour of home production. (a)How many hours are each of the spouses allocating to home production and market work? and Suppose that Anna is offered a pay raise, so that her hourly market wage increases to £25, and nothing else changes. Will that change the identity of the spouse who works more hours on the market? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardIn Example 4.1 we looked at the Cobb-Douglas utility function U(x,y)=xay1-a, where 0<=a<=1. This problem illustrates a few more attributes of that function. a. Calculate the indirect utility function for this Cobb-Douglas case. b. Calculate the expenditure function for this case. c. Shos explicitly how the compensation required to offset the effect of an increase in the price of x is related to the size of the exponent a.arrow_forwardA typical consumer has a well-behaved preference structure for his consumption bundle which includes only two goods, A and B. assume that commodity A is normal and commodity B is inferior. By keeping commodity A on the x-axis and commodity B on the y-axis you are required to show the price decomposition for commodity B when $PB increases exogenously relative to $PA. Please Answer the question by using well labelled diagramsarrow_forward
- Economic agents for example consumers or firms often do things Economic agents (for example, consumers or firms) often do things that at first glance seem to be inconsistent with their self-interest. People tip at restaurants and when they are on vacation even if they have no intention to return to the same place. Firms, sometimes, install costly pollution abatement equipment voluntarily. How can these deviations from Nash predictions be explained? Economic agents for example consumers or firms often do thingsarrow_forwardA consumer is willing to trade 4 units of x for 1 unit of y when she is consuming bundle(8, 1). She is also willing to trade in 1 unit of x for 2 units of y when she is consumingbundle (4, 4). She is indifferent between these two bundles. Assuming that the utilityfunction is Cobb-Douglas of the form U(x,y)=xα yβ, where α and β are positiveconstants, what is the utility function for this consumer?arrow_forwardQuestion 3 Consider the utility function of the form: ?=?1?1?2?2 Given the budget constraint: ?1?1+?2?2=? Show that the implied Marshallian demand curves are: ?1=?1(?1+?2)??1 ?1=?2(?1+?2)??2arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education