Critical Thinking: Did Mendel’s results from plant hybridization experiments contradict his theory?
Gregor Mendel conducted original experiment to study the genetic train of pet plants. In 1865 he wrote “Experiments in Plant Hybridization” which was published in Proceedings of the Natural History Society. Mendel presented a theory that when there are two inheritable trails, one of them will be dominant and the other will be recessive, Each parent contributes one gene to an offspring and, depending on the combination of genes, that offspring could inherit the dominant trait or the recessive trait. Mendel conducted an experiment using pea plants. The pods of pea plants can be green or yellow. When one pea carrying a dominant green gene and a recessive yellow gene is crossed with another pea carrying the same green/yellow genes, the offspring can inherit any one of these four combinations of genes: (1) green / green; (2) green / yellow; (3) yellow / green; (4) yellow / yellow. Because green is dominant rod yellow is recessive, the offspring pod will be green if either of the two inherited genes is green. The offspring can have a yellow pod only if it inherits the yellow gene from each of the two parents. Given these conditions, we expect that 3/4 of the offspring peas should have green pods; that is. P(green pod) = 3/4.
When Mendel conducted his famous hybridization experiments using parent pea plants with the green/yellow combination of genes, he obtained 580 offspring. According to Mendel’s theory, 3/4 of the offspring should have green pods, but the actual number of plants with green pods was 428. So the proportion of offspring with green pods to the total number of offspring is 428/580 = 0.738. Mendel expected a proportion of 3/4 or 0.75, but his actual result is a proportion of 0.738.
a. Assuming that P(green pod) = 3/4, find the probability that among 580 offspring, the number of peas with green pods is exactly 428.
b. Assuming that P(green pod) = 3/4, find the probability that among 580 offspring, the number of peas with green pods is 428 or fewer.
c. Which of the two preceding probabilities should be used for determining whether 428 is a significantly low number of peas with green pods?
d. Use probabilities to determine whether 428 peas with green pods is a significantly low number. (Hint: See “Identifying Significant Results with Probabilities” in Section 5-1.)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 5 Solutions
ELEMENTARY STATISTICS-W/ACCESS >CUSTOM<
- 1. A specific medication used to prevent strokes, heart attacks, and blood clots requires a different dosage of medication for members of the African American population than the Caucasian population because a specific gene affects the way the drug is metabolized within the body. This is an example of which of the following?A) Confounding B) Effect modificationC) Selection bias D) Differential biasarrow_forwardExercise 2-37 (Algo) (LO2-3) A chain of sport shops catering to beginning skiers, headquartered in Aspen, Colorado, plans to conduct a study of how much a beginning skier spends on his or her initial purchase of equipment and supplies. Based on these figures, it wants to explore the possibility of offering combinations, such as a pair of boots and a pair of skis, to induce customers to buy more. A sample of 44 cash register receipts revealed these initial purchases: $ 139 $ 82 $ 139 $ 161 $ 175 $ 82 $ 132 $ 149 $ 140 133 263 238 132 172 149 152 213 105 220 126 90 171 162 229 121 112 149 126 126 118 172 156 213 87 172 230 162 195 128 126 142 118 127 126 Click here for the Excel Data File a-1. Find the smallest class interval. Use five classes. (Round your answer to 1 decimal place.) 36.2 a-2. What would be a better class interval? $40 b. Organize the data into a frequency distribution using a lower limit of $80. I need help with the frequency.arrow_forwardIn the book Business Research Methods (5th ed.), Donald R. Cooper and C. William Emory discuss studying the relationship between on-the-job accidents and smoking. Cooper and Emory describe the study as follows: Suppose a manager implementing a smoke-free workplace policy is interested in whether smoking affects worker accidents. Since the company has complete reports of on-the-job accidents, she draws a sample of names of workers who were involved in accidents during the last year. A similar sample from among workers who had no reported accidents in the last year is drawn. She interviews members of both groups to determine if they are smokers or not. The sample results are given in the following table. On-the-Job Accident Smoker Yes No Row Total Heavy 12 5 17 Moderate 9 10 19 Nonsmoker 13 17 30 Column total 34 32 66 Expected counts are below observed counts Accident No Accident Total Heavy 12 5 17 8.76 8.24…arrow_forward
- In a two-factor experiment with two levels of factor A and two levels of factor B, three of the treatment means are essentially identical and one is substantially different from the others. What result(s) would be produced by this pattern of treatment means? a. a main effect for factor A b. a main effect for factor B c. an interaction between A and B d. main effects for both A and B, and an interactionarrow_forwardEconomists, Angrist and Lavy (1999) exploited an 800 year-old rule regarding classroom size to estimate the causal effect of smaller classes on student achievement. The rule, made famous by 12th century scholar Maimonides, states that one teacher is sufficient to manage a class with up to 40 students. Classes with more than 40 students will require 2 teachers. Angrist and Lavy noticed that strict application of this rule in certain areas meant that if 80 students were enrolled in a school, then the school would divide them up into two groups of 40 students per teacher. If 81 students were enrolled, however, they would be placed in three classes of 27 students each. The rule thus generated sharp discontinuities in class sizes within schools, which, the authors argue, allow them to provide causal evidence of a boost in fifth grade math and reading scores as a result of smaller class size. a. What research design is implied by the authors’ use of Maimonides’ rule to estimate the causal…arrow_forwardResearchers Kaitlin Woolley and Ayelet Fishbach (2019) told participants that they were participating in a study on the effects of Hunger. Pairs of participants were told to eat a snack of salsa and chips with a stranger, after which they engaged in a negotiation task. After which, they engaged in a negotation task. Half of the participant-pairs were randomly assigned to share a plate of salsa and chips, and the other half of participant-pairs were randomly assigned to eat their own individual servings. More specifically, the researchers reported that "participants were run in pairs of strangers. We preregistered the study and collected data from 200 undergraduate and graduate students outside a campus cafe (107 female; M=23.57 years, SD=8.80)" What did the researchers mean when they said they "preregistered the study"? a. They registered the study on a website so that students could signup to participate b. They recorded their research design and analysis plan before conducting the…arrow_forward
- PART II: Now, consider only those who do not have an infection. Repeat #1 - #5 above for these subjects. For #1, make your stemplot back-to-back with the previous stemplot. For #5, make your boxplots side-by- side. PART II: Now, consider only those who do not have an infection. Repeat #1 - #5 above for these subjects. For #1, make your stemplot back-to-back with the previous stemplot. For #5, make your boxplots side-by- side. 1. For these subjects only, construct a stemplot for the variable “heart rate”. (We will be making this into a back-to-back stemplot later, so leave room on the left side.)2. Discuss the shape of your stemplot. Is it symmetric? Positively skewed? Negatively skewed? None of these? Are there any outliers?3. How would you describe the center and the spread of this distribution?4. Find the five-number summary.5. Construct a box plot.arrow_forwardA team of researchers is testing the effectiveness of a new HPV vaccine. They randomly divide the subjects into two groups.Group 1 receives no vaccine, and Group 2 receives the new HPV vaccine.The patients in the study do not know which group they are in.Which is the treatment group? Group 1 Group 2 Neither group Which is the control group (if there is one)? Group 1 Group 2 No control group Is this study blind, double blind, or neither? Blind Double-blind Neither Which best describes this research? Survey Observational Study Experimentarrow_forwardThe extending research findings and conclusions from a study conducted on a sample population to the population at large is called? Transferability Generalizability Causality All of the abovearrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman