Concept explainers
Variance interpretation
Vanadium Audio Inc. is a small manufacturer of electronic musical instruments. The plant manager received the following variable factory overhead report for the past month of operations:
Actual units produced: 15,000 (90% of practical capacity)
The plant manager is not pleased with the $12,320 unfavorable variable factory overhead controllable variance and has come to discuss the matter with the controller. The following discussion occurred:
Plant Manager: I just received this factory report for the latest month of operations. I’m not very pleased with these figures. Before these numbers go to headquarters, you and I need to reach an understanding.
Controller: Go ahead. What’s the problem?
Plant Manager: What’s the problem? Well, everything. Look at the variance. It’s too large. If I understand the accounting approach being used here, you are assuming that my costs are variable to the units produced. Thus, as the production volume declines, so should these costs. Well, I don’t believe these costs are variable at all. I think they are fixed costs. As a result, when we operate below capacity, the costs really don’t go down. I’m being penalized for costs I have no control over. I need this report to be redone to reflect this fact. If anything, the difference between actual and budget is essentially a volume variance. Listen, I know that you’re a team player. You really need to reconsider your assumptions on this one.
Assume you are the controller. Write a memo responding to the plant manager.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 9 Solutions
Bundle: Managerial Accounting, 15th + Cengagenowv2, 1 Term Printed Access Card
- Anders Painting Service specializes in painting tall office buildings. During a recent month, the company worked on three painting projects (the Arrow Building, the Besler Building and the Cartrwright Building). The company is interested in controlling the materials costs, namely the paint, used for these painting contracts. In order to provide management with useful cost control information, the company uses standard costs and prepares monthly variance reports. Analysis reveals that the purchasing agent mistakenly purchased poor-quality paint for the Arrow Building project. The Besler Building project, however, received higher-than-standard-quality paint that was on sale. The Cartwright Building project received standard-quality paint. However, the price had increased and a new employee was used to paint the building. Shown below are quantity and cost data for each project. Actual Project Arrow Building Besler Building Cartwright Building 4,500 Total variance Quantity 3,750 gallons…arrow_forwardLily Painting Service specializes in painting tall office buildings. During a recent month, the company worked on three painting projects (the Arrow Building, the Besler Building and the Cartrwright Building). The company is interested in controlling the materials costs, namely the paint, used for these painting contracts. In order to provide management with useful cost control information, the company uses standard costs and prepares monthly variance reports. Analysis reveals that the purchasing agent mistakenly purchased poor-quality paint for the Arrow Building project. The Besler Building project, however, received higher-than-standard-quality paint that was on sale. The Cartwright Building project received standard-quality paint. However, the price had increased and a new employee was used to paint the building. Shown below are quantity and cost data for each project. Project Arrow Building Besler Building Total variance (a) Cartwright Building 4,540 Project Arrow Building Besler…arrow_forwardLily Painting Service specializes in painting tall office buildings. During a recent month, the company worked on three painting projects (the Arrow Building, the Besler Building and the Cartrwright Building). The company is interested in controlling the materials costs, namely the paint, used for these painting contracts. In order to provide management with useful cost control information, the company uses standard costs and prepares monthly variance reports. Analysis reveals that the purchasing agent mistakenly purchased poor-quality paint for the Arrow Building project. The Besler Building project, however, received higher-than-standard-quality paint that was on sale. The Cartwright Building project received standard-quality paint. However, the price had increased and a new employee was used to paint the building. Shown below are quantity and cost data for each project. Project Arrow Building Costs 3,720 gallons $275,280 3,500 gallons $273,000 bring $290,320 4,000 $363,200 4,220…arrow_forward
- Critiquing a Variance Report; Preparing a Performance Report Several years ago, Westmont Corporation developed a comprehensive budgeting system for planning and control purposes. While departmental supervisors have been happy with the system, the factory manager has expressed considerable dissatisfaction with the information being generated by the system. A report for the company’s Assembly department for the month of march follows: After receiving a copy of this cost report, the supervisor of the assembly department started, “These reports are super. It makes me feel really good to see how well things are going in my department. I can’t understand why those people upstairs complain so much about the reports.” For the last several years, the company’s marketing department has chronically failed to meet the sales goals expressed in the company’s monthly budgets. Required: 1. The company’s president is uneasy about the cost reports and would like you to evaluate their usefulness to the…arrow_forwardMadison Company uses the following rule to determine whether direct labor efficiency variances ought to be investigated. A direct labor efficiency variance will be investigated anytime the amount exceeds the lesser of 12,000 or 10 percent of the standard labor cost. Reports for the past five weeks provided the following information: Required: 1. Using the rule provided, identify the cases that will be investigated. 2. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance is the use of lower quality direct materials than are usually used. Who is responsible? What corrective action would likely be taken? 3. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of a significant favorable direct labor efficiency variance is attributable to a new approach to manufacturing that takes less labor time but causes more direct materials waste. Upon examining the direct materials usage variance, it is discovered to be unfavorable, and it is larger than the favorable direct labor efficiency variance. Who is responsible? What action should be taken? How would your answer change if the unfavorable variance were smaller than the favorable?arrow_forwardSitka Industries uses a cost system that carries direct materials inventory at a standard cost. The controller has established these standards for one ladder (unit): Sitka Industries made 3,000 ladders in July and used 8,800 pounds of material to make these units. Smith Industries bought 15,500 pounds of material in the current period. There was a $250 unfavorable direct materials price variance. A. How much in total did Sitka pay for the 15,500 pounds? B. What is the direct materials quantity variance? C. What is the total direct material cost variance? D. What ii 9,500 pounds were used to make these ladders, what would be the direct materials quantity variance? E. It there was a $340 favorable direct materials price variance, how much did Sitka pay for the 15,500 pounds of material?arrow_forward
- At the end of the period, the factory overhead account has a credit balance of 10,000. (a) Is the total factory cost variance favorable or unfavorable? (b) Are the controllable and volume variances favorable or unfavorable?arrow_forwardVincent Bassani has come to the accounting department for help in interpreting his variance report. He says that he understands that last month was not a very good one for output, but he really thought everyone put forth good effort, so he is confused about the existence of an unfavorable labor efficiency variance. He cites as an example of the workers' effort their willingness to work extra hours to get full output, even when a whole week's worth of production had to be scrapped. He knew that his materials costs would be higher, and that overtime would make his rate variance unfavorable, but he certainly didn't think his workers had been inefficient. Required: Write a short note to Vincent explaining the probable cause of the unfavorable labor efficiency variancearrow_forwardQuality Motor Company is an auto repair shop that uses standards to control its labor time and labor cost. The standard labor cost for a motor tune-up is given below: Standard Standard Rate Standard Cost Hours Motor tune-up 2.50 $38.00 $95.00 Book The record showing the time spent in the shop last week on motor tune-ups has been misplaced. However, the shop supervisor recalls that 58 tune-ups were completed during the week, and the controller recalls the following variance data relating to tune- Hint ups: Print erences $ 450 F $ 500 U Labor rate variance Labor spending variance Required: 1. Determine the number of actual labor-hours spent on tune-ups during the week. 2. Determine the actual hourly pay rate for tune-ups last week. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) < Prev 5 of 8 Next aw 2:33 PM nere to search (? 4/8/2021 4+ 7.44 441 wwsert 96 & 6 80 69arrow_forward
- During June, the Conchran Manufacturing Company's costing system reported several variances that the production manager was surprised to see. Most of the company's monthly variances are under $125, even though they may be either favorable or unfavorable. The following information is for the manufacture of garden gates, its only product. (1) Direct materials price variance, S800 unfavorable. (2) Direct materials efficiency variance, $1,800 favorable. (3) Direct manufacturing labor price variance, $4,000 favorable. (4) Direct manufacturing labor efficiency variance, S600 unfavorable. Provide the manager with some ideas as to what may have caused the pricearrow_forwardCritiquing a Cost Report; Preparing a Performance Report Frank Weston, supervisor of the Freemont Corporation’s matching department, was visibly upset after being reprimanded for his department’s poor performance over the prior month. The department’s cost control report is given below: “I just can’t understand all of these unfavorable variances,” Weston complained to the supervisor of another department. “When the boss called me in, 1 thought he was going to give me a pat on the back because 1 know for a fact that my department worked more efficiently last month than it has ever worked before. Instead, he tore me apart. I thought for a minute that it might be over the supplies that were stolen out of our warehouse last month. But they only amounted to a couple of hundred dollars, and just look at this report. Everything is unfavorable.” Direct labor wages and supplies are variable costs; supervision and depreciation are fixed costs; and maintenance and utilities are mixed costs. The…arrow_forwardRequired information [The following information applies to the questions dispiayed below] Alvarez Company for the current period shows a $22,000 favorable volume variance and a $59.000 unfavorable controllable variance. Standard overhead applied for the period is $233,000. Alvarez records standard costs in its accounts. Prepare the journal entry to charge overhead costs to the Work in Process Inventory account and to record any variances. View transaction list Journal entry worksheet A Record overhead applied to production and overhead variances. Note: Enter debits before credits. Transaction General Journal Debit Credit 1 Record entry Clear entry View general journalarrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubFinancial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College