Moral Theory Essay

determine the moral rightness or wrongness? A question within the Divine Command Theory is, is it possible to have the basis for morality if there is no God. In this case, it doesn't matter if an individual is religious or not. There is no basis for morality if there is no God because people do not reach their full potential. Then without a basis for morality, we (as humans) would not be able to evolve. Divine Command Theory is a meta-ethical theory, it is also a form of moral objectivism. Moral Objectivism

first moral system I choose to analyze this situation with is the divine command theory. The divine command theory is the theory that relies heavily on religion and might even be one of the oldest documented moral systems out there. The morality relies on if it was commanded by the divine. It’s a relatively easy system to follow because if you need to figure out what to do, all you need to do is check the rule book or the teachings of the divine to find your answer. In the divine command theory, when

referred to by the title of our text helps to examine the various aspects of our own ethical moral theory. Ethical moral theory dominates our lives on a daily basis. Determining actions we consider being right or wrong depending on the availability of the situation. But, as situations vary, so does the reasoning behind activities. Although each individual has his/her own mindset and beliefs, the ethical moral standards which create the baseline of our own morality, differs with our individual teachings

is the aim of moral (ethical) theory that you learned from the reading? Elaborate on this by explaining how you think that having a clearer understanding of ethics can affect your life. The purpose and aim for moral theory has to do with the desire to have some method to follow when we reason about what is morally right and wrong. In other words, the main aim of moral theory is to discover a decision procedure that can be used to guide correct moral reasoning about matters of moral concern (3 Timmons)

Some people think that one aim of a moral theory is to give one a “decision procedure” to use when faced with moral problems. Decision procedures are defined as procedures that are similar to an algorithm for determining a finite number of specific steps that validate a particular proposition or argument. Well known examples of a decision procedure is the popular Venn-diagrams for aid in determining an interpretation of categorical knowledge and truth tables which are used in calculus problems. But

this growth can be connected to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development. Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development is a three-stage system of ideas on how moral reasoning development (¨Kohlberg's Theory¨). Within all those three steps there is a total of six detailed steps explaining how one's moral reasoning grows, whether it is incidents or experiences in a person's lifetime. As in the novel, it is seen how Scout sees and experiences things that make her moral reasoning grow. Along the book it is seen

believe that the moral theory of Deontology, which is also called non-consequentialism, incorrectly answers the question “What is right?” The reason being that Deontology answers this question base on each individual experience and belief, which most likely will always be different from person to person. In my stance I will first explain the moral theory of Deontology, secondly I will point out how Deontology answers the question “What is right?”, and lastly analyze why the moral theory of Deontology

head: PIAGET & KOHLBERG RESEARCH ON THE COGNITIVE & MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORIES OF JEAN PIAGET & LAWRENCE KOHLBERG DONNA O. O 'CONNOR INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF THE CARIBBEAN ABSTRACT The intention of this paper is to provide an overview of the psychological theories of Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg. While Piaget 's perspective was psychological, Kholberg 's viewpoint was psychological with emphasis placed on moral development and both theories will be compared and contrasted in this paper. Furthermore

Kant's moral theory According to Timmons, the field of philosophy is not complete without the mention of Kant whose contributions were major (205). This, he adds, was influenced by his originality, subtle approach and the difficulty of his works. Timmons cites that moral requirements are a requirement of reason, which is the ideology of Kant’s Moral theory; hence, immoral act is an act against reason. Consequently, speaking on the terminologies of Kant we visualize moral requirements as Categorical

influences the general audience. When the media is combined with moral theories, known as the guides for humans to figure out what actions are either right or wrong, it creates a balance in our entertainment about what is ethical or not to display on society. By having various Moral Theories and none of them being one 100 percent perfect, it causes humans to create their own satisfactory moral theory. My own satisfactory moral theory, in essence, is a combination of being able to take into consideration