MAAE2202_Lab B
docx
School
Carleton University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2202
Subject
Mechanical Engineering
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
12
Uploaded by LieutenantMetal13000
Carleton University
Laboratory Report
Course #: MAAE 2202
Lab #: B
Lab Section #:
Stresses in a Thin-Walled Pressure Vessel
2022/10/25
Summary
The main objectives of this experiment are to obtain the internal pressure of a thin-walled pressure
vessel by measuring the strains on the surface, and to gain practical experience in strain gauge
application techniques. In this experiment, the pressure vessel used was a pop can made of aluminum
3004. The experiment was performed twice, once with an undisturbed can, and once with a disturbed,
shaken can. The carbon dioxide bubbles formed in the disturbed can varied the results of the
experiment. The strain in the longitudinal and circumferential directions was measured using strain
gauges. From these values, the stress and pressure in both directions was calculated. For the unshaken
can, the pressure in the hoop and longitudinal direction was 227kPa and 105kPa, respectively. For the
shaken can, the pressures were 244kPa in the hoop direction and 98kPa in the longitudinal.
Nomenclature
Table 1:
Nomenclature Used in the Report
Symbol
Parameter
Unit
F
Internal Force
kN
σ
Stress
GPa
ε
Strain
Unitless
E
Elastic/Young’s Modulus
GPa
P
Internal Pressure
GPa
t
wall
Vessel Wall Thickness
MPa
d
Vessel Nominal Diameter
GPa
R
Hoop to Longitudinal Ratio
Unitless
SF
Safety Factor
Unitless
%error
Error Percentage
%
Theory and Analysis
Thin-walled cylindrical pressure vessels such as the pop can used in this experiment develop stresses in
both circumferential and longitudinal directions when subjected to internal pressure. These stresses are
called the hoop and longitudinal stress and can be seen in
Figure 1
.
Figure 1:
Diagram showing stresses in the circumferential and longitudinal directions of a cylinder
P a g e 2 | 12
Like other stresses, the stresses in the longitudinal and circumferential direction of the vessel adhere to
the Young’s Modulus relation:
E
=
σ
long
ε
long
→σ
long
=
E×ε
long
→ε
long
=
σ
long
E
E
=
σ
hoop
ε
hoop
→σ
hoop
=
E ×ε
hoop
→ε
hoop
=
σ
hoop
E
To find the hoop stress, the forces in the circumferential direction across the can must be analyzed. This
will be done using force equilibrium of
Figure 2
.
Figure 2:
Diagram to show force equilibrium in the circumferential direction
Assuming the body is in equilibrium, the force F shown in the diagram can be written in 2 ways:
1.
F
=
PA
=
P
hoop
× L×d
2.
F
=
2
×σ
hoop
×t
wall
×L
If these equations are set equal, solving for the hoop stress we obtain:
σ
hoop
=
P
hoop
d
2
t
wall
Equation 1
By substituting hoop stress from the Young’s modulus relation into Equation 1 and solving for pressure:
E×ε
hoop
=
P
hoop
d
2
t
wall
→ P
hoop
=
2
Eε
hoop
t
wall
d
Equation 2
P a g e 3 | 12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
To find the longitudinal stress, the same method is used. This time we will use force equilibrium for
Figure 3
.
Figure 3:
Diagram to show force equilibrium in the longitudinal direction
Assuming the body is in equilibrium, similar to the hoop force, the force F can be expressed in 2 ways:
1.
F
=
P
long
×π×
d
2
4
2.
F
=
σ
long
×π ×d×t
wall
Setting the equations equal and solving for longitudinal stress, we obtain:
σ
long
=
P
long
d
4
t
wall
Equation 3
In the same way as the hoop pressure was found, by substituting in stress from Young’s modulus relation
to Equation 3, we receive:
E×ε
long
=
P
long
d
4
t
wall
→P
long
=
4
E ε
long
t
wall
d
Equation 4
The safety factor of the can uses the ultimate stress of the can and the experimental stress in the form:
SF
=
σ
ult
σ
exp
Equation 5
P a g e 4 | 12
The experimental ratio is the ratio of experimental hoop stress to experimental longitudinal stress:
R
exp
=
σ
hoop
σ
long
Equation 6
The experimental ratio will be used to compare to the theoretical ratio to gain an error percentage:
%error
=
|
R
exp
−
R
theo
R
theo
|
×
100%
Equation 7
Experimental Setup and Procedure
P a g e 5 | 12
Figure 4:
Labeled diagram of experimental setup
The experiment was conducted as outlined in the lab manual.
Results and Discussion
Requirement A
To find the hoop and longitudinal stresses and pressures, equations 1-4 were used with MatWeb’s
published modulus of elasticity for aluminum 3004. The results were tabulated in
Table 2
.
Table 2:
Summary of Calculated Stresses and Pressures
Experiment
Hoop Stress
(Pa)
Longitudina
l Stress (Pa)
Hoop
Pressure
(Pa)
Longitudina
l Pressure
(Pa)
Unshaken
Can
70,829,200
16,467,100
226,653
105,389
Shaken Can
76,134,500
15,295,800
243,630
97,893
The hoop stress and pressure for both the unshaken and shaken cans is significantly greater than the
longitudinal stresses and pressures. One major reason for this is the geometry of the pop can. The long
cylinder naturally poses for more strain in the circumferential direction as it is easier for the internal
pressure to increase the can’s diameter than it is to increase the can’s length. This is because there is less
support stopping the diameter from expanding than there is for the length. Analyzing a pop can, if you
were to take 2 points parallel in the hoop direction, there is only empty space between them. Using the
same method, if you were to take 2 points in the longitudinal direction, there would be material
between the points. Another reason the hoop stresses and pressures are so much larger than the
longitudinal is the nature of the equations, as the hoop stress should be twice as large as the
longitudinal stress (further explained in the Requirement C section). Something else to note is that the
hoop stress is greater for the shaken can, while the inverse is true for the longitudinal stress. This could
mean some of the longitudinal stress was transferred to hoop stress when the can was shaken, although
critically speaking, this could mean anything given only one experiment was conducted for each can.
Requirement B
To find the safety factor of the can, equation 5 was used with MatWeb’s published ultimate strength
value for aluminum 3004 as well as the calculated hoop and longitudinal stress values. The results can be
seen in
Table 3
.
Table 3:
Safety Factors of Cans Using Different Stresses
Experiment
SF using Hoop Stress
SF using Longitudinal
Stress
P a g e 6 | 12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Unshaken Can
2.527
10.870
Shaken Can
2.351
11.703
The safety factor in the longitudinal direction is much greater than the circumferential direction for both
the unshaken and shaken cans. This is because the stresses were much greater in the hoop direction
(further explained in the Requirement A section). Because the safety factors in the longitudinal
directions are so much greater, they are irrelevant to the can’s overall safety factor, as it does not matter
in which direction it breaks. As the hoop safety factor is lower for the shaken can, we can say with
certainty that the overall safety factor is equal to or less than 2.35.
Requirement C
When analyzing equations 1 and 3, it is possible to compare hoop and longitudinal stress only if the
hoop pressure is equal to the longitudinal pressure. Theoretically, the internal pressure should be
uniform throughout the can so we can assume P
hoop
=P
long
. If this is the case, if we were to solve for
internal pressure in equations 1 and 3, and set them equal, we can find the theoretical ratio:
2
σ
hoop
t
wall
d
=
4
σ
long
t
wall
d
→
2
σ
hoop
=
4
σ
long
→
σ
hoop
σ
long
=
2
=
R
theo
To find the experimental ratio, equation 6 was used for both the unshaken and shaken cans. The error
percentage relative to the theoretical value was also calculated using equation 7. The results are
catalogued in
Table 4
.
Table 4:
Experimental Stress Ratio and Error Percentage When Compared to Theoretical
Experiment
Ratio
Error Percentage (%)
Unshaken Can
4.301
115
Shaken Can
4.977
148
The ratio is really a measure of the difference in hoop stress to longitudinal stress. The ratio in the
shaken can is greater than the unshaken can. Reasons for this could include more randomness in the
particles, or the way in which the can was opened. If the can was opened at a different angle, or opened
at a different pace, it could affect the result. Considering only 1 experiment was performed for both the
unshaken and shaken cans, it would be ludicrous to come to a definite conclusion as the results could be
inverted given another trial. Neither of the cans came close to the theoretical ratio, with both having a
laughable error percentage. Reasons for error include the sensitivity of the strain gauge, the orientation
of the strain gauge, and the way the strain gauge was put on. The slightest movement, or vibration
drastically fluctuated the gauges reading, so the calculations would not be very accurate. The gauges
were also lined up using the historic ‘eyeball’ technique, where no equipment was used to confirm if the
gauges were perpendicular. The gauges were put on using a layer of super glue which could have led to
inaccuracies as well. Another source of error could be that the theoretical value was obtained through
P a g e 7 | 12
the analysis of a perfect cylinder, to which the pop can clearly is not. The material at the top of the can
could be different from the body and the bottom’s concavity would affect the results.
Requirement D
The can’s shape naturally helps battle over-pressurization as the cylindrical walls eliminate edges which
would be weak points. The curvature at the top and bottom of the can also ensure fewer sharp edges.
The concave bottom allows the can to support more pressure than if the bottom was flat. It distributes
some of the vertical forces into horizontal components. Another advantage of the dome shaped bottom
is the ease in increasing the volume of the can without breakage. If the can is dropped, often the
concave bottom will push out and become convex, increasing the total volume of the can, and lowering
the pressure. I can say with confidence that this happens more often than the can spewing liquid as I
work for Pepsi and see this happening all the time.
Conclusion
The main objectives of the experiment were met. The internal pressures of the thin-walled pressure
vessels were calculated from the measured strains. Practical experience was gained from the use of
strain gauges application techniques. Although definitive answers for stress and pressure were
calculated, the degree of accuracy is very low for an experiment of this nature. None of the results would
have any validity in the professional field as only one trial was performed for both the unshaken and
shaken cans. This is further proven by the enormous percentage of error for the stress ratio when
compared to the theoretical. With this being said, the experiment still provides reasonable
approximations for the can’s behaviour, such as the fact that the circumferential stress and pressure is
much larger than the longitudinal.
References
MAAE 2202 - Lab Manual pages 11-19 (MAAE 2202A/B Brightspace course page, Administration tab)
P a g e 8 | 12
“Aluminum 3004-O.”
MatWeb
, The Aluminum Association,
https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?
matguid=b40f2ca72f504f298d6f5399ce00440f&ckck=1.
Ward-Bailey, 14 April, 2015,
“The Surprising Science
Behind the Aluminum Soda
Can”
https://www.csmonitor.com/
Science/Science-
Notebook/2015/0414/The-
surprising-science-behind-
the-
aluminum-soda-can
, Oct.
17, 2019, The Christian
Science Monitor.
Ward-Baily, Jeff. “The Surprising Science Behind the Aluminum Soda Can.” The Christian
Science Monitor, 14 Apr. 2015, https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Science-
Notebook/2015/0414/The-surprising-science-behind-the-aluminum-soda-can.
P a g e 9 | 12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Ward-Bailey, 14 April, 2015,
“The Surprising Science
Behind the Aluminum Soda
Can”
https://www.csmonitor.com/
Science/Science-
Notebook/2015/0414/The-
surprising-science-behind-
the-
aluminum-soda-can
, Oct.
17, 2019, The Christian
Science Monitor
Appendices
Appendix A: Lab Data
Table 5:
Can Dimensions Given in Lab Data
Can Dimensions (mm)
Diameter, d
65.53
Length, L
121.45
Thickness, t
wall
0.104
Table 6:
MatWeb’s Published Aluminum 3004 Properties
P a g e 10 | 12
Metal Properties
Modulus of Elasticity, E
68.9 GPa
Ultimate Stress, σ
ultimate
179 MPa
Table 7:
Experimental Strain Results for Unshaken Can
Unshaken
BAM Reading
Strain
Hoop
-1028
1028 x 10
-6
Longitudinal
-239
239 x 10
-6
Table 8:
Experimental Strain Results for Shaken Can
Shaken
BAM Reading
Strain
Hoop
-1105
1105 x 10
-6
Longitudinal
-222
222 x 10
-6
Appendix B: Sample Calculations
Sample calculation for hoop stress using Young’s modulus relation for the unshaken can
σ
hoop
=
E×ε
hoop
σ
hoop
=
(
68.9
×
10
9
Pa
)
×
(
1028
×
10
−
6
)
σ
hoop
=
70,829,200
Pa
=
70.8
MPa
Sample calculation for longitudinal stress using Young’s modulus relation for the unshaken can
σ
long
=
E×ε
long
σ
long
=
(
68.9
×
10
9
Pa
)
×
(
239
×
10
−
6
)
σ
long
=
16,467,100
Pa
=
16.5
MPa
Sample calculation for internal pressure using Equation 2 for the unshaken can with hoop strain
P
hoop
=
2
Eε
hoop
t
wall
d
P
hoop
=
2
×
(
68.9
×
10
9
Pa
)
×
(
1028
×
10
−
6
)
×
(
1.04
×
10
−
4
m
)
(
0.065
m
)
P
hoop
=
226,653
Pa
=
226.7
kPa
Sample calculation for internal pressure using Equation 4 for the unshaken can with longitudinal strain
P a g e 11 | 12
P
long
=
4
Eε
long
t
wall
d
P
long
=
4
×
(
68.9
×
10
9
Pa
)
×
(
239
×
10
−
6
)
×
(
1.04
×
10
−
4
m
)
(
0.065
m
)
P
long
=
105,389
Pa
=
105.4
kPa
Sample calculation for safety factor using equation 5 for the unshaken can with hoop stress
SF
=
σ
ult
σ
exp
SF
=
179
MPa
70.8
MPa
SF
=
2.527
Sample calculation for experimental stress ratio using equation 6 for the unshaken can
R
exp
=
σ
hoop
σ
long
R
exp
=
70.8
MPa
16.5
MPa
R
exp
=
4.301
Sample calculation for error percentage using equation 7 for unshaken can
%error
=
|
R
exp
−
R
theo
R
theo
|
×
100%
%error
=
|
4.301
−
2
2
|
×
100%
%error
=
115 %
P a g e 12 | 12
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
6. State your answers to the following questions.Strain Gauge represents the deformation of a material through a change in resistance. If so, explain how temperature will affect the strain gauge in the experimental environment.①:In this experiment, the Strain Gauge measures the strain in micro units. Explain one possible error factor when applying a load by hanging a weight on the material with the strain gauge attached. (Hint: It is easy to shake by hanging the weight using a thread)①:
arrow_forward
Please use ANSYS SOFTWARE
arrow_forward
A metallic strain gauge produces an electrical resistance change when subjected to
mechanical strain. However, engineers don't measure this voltage drop directly using
a voltmeter. Why don't we directly measure the voltage drop across the strain gauge,
and instead, use a Wheatstone Bridge?
Damgraph
>
arrow_forward
Hi can you please help me with the attached question?
arrow_forward
1. A tensile test was conducted on a metal "505" specimen and the following stress-strain curves
were generated, both curves generated from the same set of data. Use the graphs to fill in the
mechanical properties of the material tested in the box below. Don't forget units!
Stress vs Strain
Stress, psi
Stress, psi
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0.00
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0.02
0
0.000 0.002
0.04
0.004
0.06
0.006
0.08
0.10
Strain
Stress vs Strain
0.008
0.12
Elastic Modulus, E:
0.2% Offset Yield Strength, oo:
Tensile Strength, ou:
Breaking Strength, of:
% Elongation:
0.14
0.010 0.012 0.014
Strain
0.16
0.18
0.016 0.018
0.20
0.020
arrow_forward
please solve part b, this is past paper and just iam studying, mechanical engineering
arrow_forward
Please solve last 2 subparts
arrow_forward
We're measuring axial load in a rectangular bar with two strain gauges: one on the top in the
axial direction and the other on the bottom in the transverse direction). An axial load, P, is
applied and the ambient temperature is varying with time.
P
#
Strain gages
> Р
(a) If one strain gauge is connected to leg 1 of the Wheatstone bridge, which leg (2, 3, or 4) would
you connect the other strain gauge in order to achieve temperature compensation? Please
explain your choice by writing out the equation.
(b) Calculate the bridge constant of this arrangement,
your
(c) If some bending moment were inadvertently applied (in addition to the axial load), would
choice in part (a) provide compensation for bending loading? Justify your answer by writing out
the equation.
arrow_forward
Find the original cross sectional area anf original length from the given information about a tensile test done on a specimen
arrow_forward
Detailed steps
arrow_forward
I want handwriteen and correct answer only don't do if u don't knowpls
arrow_forward
The following data was obtained as a result of tensile testing of a standard 0.505 inch diameter test specimen of magnesium. After fracture, the gage length is 2.245 inch and the diameter is 0.466 inch.
a). Calculate the engineering stress and strain values to fill in the blank boxes and plot the data.
Load(lb)
Gage Length (in)
Stress (kpsi)
Strain
0
2
1000
2.00154
2000
2.00308
3000
2.00462
4000
2.00615
5000
2.00769
5500
2.014
6000
2.05
6200 (max)
2.13
6000 (fracture)
2.255
b). Calculate the modulus of elasticity
c). If another identical sample of the same material is pulled only to 6000 pounds and is unloaded from there, determine the gage length of the sample after unloading.
arrow_forward
Question 6
What kind of problem would arise if components of the strain tensor were defined
as v
arrow_forward
Stress Strain Diagram
The Data shown in the table have been obtained from a tensile test conducted on
a high-strength steel. The test specimen had a diameter of 0.505 inch and a gage
length of 2.00 inch. Using software. plot the Stress-Strain Diagram for this steel
and determine its:
A= TTdT(050s
A
%3D
1. Proportional Limit,
2. Modulus of Elasticity,
3. Yield Strength (SY) at 0.2% Offset,
4. Ultimate Strength (Su),
5. Percent Elongation in 2.00 inch,
6. Percent Reduction in Area,
7. Present the results (for Steps 1-6) in a highly organized table.
e Altac ie sheet (as problelle
4
A = 0.2.002
BEOINNING of the effort
Elongation
(in)
Elongation
(In)
Load
Load
#:
#3
(Ib)
(Ib)
1
0.0170
15
12,300
0.0004
1,500
16
12,200
0.0200
0.0010
3.
3,100
17
12,000
0.0275
0.0016
4,700
18
13,000
0.0335
5.
6,300
0.0022
19
15,000
0.0400
0.0026
6.
8,000
20
16,200
0.055
0.0032
9,500
21
17,500
0.0680
0.0035
8.
11,000
22
18,800
0.1080
0.0041
11,800
23
19,600
0.1515
0.0051
24
20,100
0.2010
10
12,300
0.0071
25…
arrow_forward
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
Strain mm/mm
The graph above shows the stress-strain relationship of a steel bar under tension
test. The steel bar diameter = 8 mm and the bar gauge length = 100 mm. Determine
the following:
If the specimen is loaded to 550 MPa and then unloaded. What would be the
modulus of resilience of the sample after reloading?
Stress (MPa)
arrow_forward
Please do it fast and do both pls it's a request but please explain both and handwritten pls I will rate
arrow_forward
Using the four-point bending tool, discuss how measurements of transverse
strain using DIC and compare with those from the strain gauge attached at
the centre top of the specimen. In your answer, include the following:
a. A short explanation of how each of the strain measurement techniques
works.
(4 marks)
b. A description of the methodology you have used to make the data that
you discussed from each technique as comparable as possible.
(6 marks)
c. A set of figures (images, graphs and/or tables as necessary) with
appropriate captions demonstrating the comparability of data extracted
from the two strain measurement methods. This should include at least
three different applied loads.
(10 marks)
d. A brief description of the findings.
(5 marks)
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Oxford University Press

Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9780134319650
Author:Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:PEARSON

Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781259822674
Author:Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education

Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781118170519
Author:Norman S. Nise
Publisher:WILEY

Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781337093347
Author:Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781118807330
Author:James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:WILEY
Related Questions
- 6. State your answers to the following questions.Strain Gauge represents the deformation of a material through a change in resistance. If so, explain how temperature will affect the strain gauge in the experimental environment.①:In this experiment, the Strain Gauge measures the strain in micro units. Explain one possible error factor when applying a load by hanging a weight on the material with the strain gauge attached. (Hint: It is easy to shake by hanging the weight using a thread)①:arrow_forwardPlease use ANSYS SOFTWAREarrow_forwardA metallic strain gauge produces an electrical resistance change when subjected to mechanical strain. However, engineers don't measure this voltage drop directly using a voltmeter. Why don't we directly measure the voltage drop across the strain gauge, and instead, use a Wheatstone Bridge? Damgraph >arrow_forward
- Hi can you please help me with the attached question?arrow_forward1. A tensile test was conducted on a metal "505" specimen and the following stress-strain curves were generated, both curves generated from the same set of data. Use the graphs to fill in the mechanical properties of the material tested in the box below. Don't forget units! Stress vs Strain Stress, psi Stress, psi 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 0.00 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0.02 0 0.000 0.002 0.04 0.004 0.06 0.006 0.08 0.10 Strain Stress vs Strain 0.008 0.12 Elastic Modulus, E: 0.2% Offset Yield Strength, oo: Tensile Strength, ou: Breaking Strength, of: % Elongation: 0.14 0.010 0.012 0.014 Strain 0.16 0.18 0.016 0.018 0.20 0.020arrow_forwardplease solve part b, this is past paper and just iam studying, mechanical engineeringarrow_forward
- Please solve last 2 subpartsarrow_forwardWe're measuring axial load in a rectangular bar with two strain gauges: one on the top in the axial direction and the other on the bottom in the transverse direction). An axial load, P, is applied and the ambient temperature is varying with time. P # Strain gages > Р (a) If one strain gauge is connected to leg 1 of the Wheatstone bridge, which leg (2, 3, or 4) would you connect the other strain gauge in order to achieve temperature compensation? Please explain your choice by writing out the equation. (b) Calculate the bridge constant of this arrangement, your (c) If some bending moment were inadvertently applied (in addition to the axial load), would choice in part (a) provide compensation for bending loading? Justify your answer by writing out the equation.arrow_forwardFind the original cross sectional area anf original length from the given information about a tensile test done on a specimenarrow_forward
- Detailed stepsarrow_forwardI want handwriteen and correct answer only don't do if u don't knowplsarrow_forwardThe following data was obtained as a result of tensile testing of a standard 0.505 inch diameter test specimen of magnesium. After fracture, the gage length is 2.245 inch and the diameter is 0.466 inch. a). Calculate the engineering stress and strain values to fill in the blank boxes and plot the data. Load(lb) Gage Length (in) Stress (kpsi) Strain 0 2 1000 2.00154 2000 2.00308 3000 2.00462 4000 2.00615 5000 2.00769 5500 2.014 6000 2.05 6200 (max) 2.13 6000 (fracture) 2.255 b). Calculate the modulus of elasticity c). If another identical sample of the same material is pulled only to 6000 pounds and is unloaded from there, determine the gage length of the sample after unloading.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Elements Of ElectromagneticsMechanical EngineeringISBN:9780190698614Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.Publisher:Oxford University PressMechanics of Materials (10th Edition)Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9780134319650Author:Russell C. HibbelerPublisher:PEARSONThermodynamics: An Engineering ApproachMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781259822674Author:Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. BolesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Control Systems EngineeringMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781118170519Author:Norman S. NisePublisher:WILEYMechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9781337093347Author:Barry J. Goodno, James M. GerePublisher:Cengage LearningEngineering Mechanics: StaticsMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781118807330Author:James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. BoltonPublisher:WILEY

Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Oxford University Press

Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9780134319650
Author:Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:PEARSON

Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781259822674
Author:Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education

Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781118170519
Author:Norman S. Nise
Publisher:WILEY

Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781337093347
Author:Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781118807330
Author:James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:WILEY