loiV Inavi lo nolleo Attach: - Three data tables from Excel (one for each trial) showing the five columns described in the Procedure. - Three graphs for each trial (nine total) clearly showing the trendline and R2 for each graph. One to three graphs are allowed per page, and they should be clearly readable, taking up most of a page. Each graph must be no larger than a single page. Graph summary data: R2 for of In[CV] [CV+] vs t vs t 0,985 R2 for plot R2 for plot Reaction Rate of 1/[CV-] Order (k) 2nd and plot of Constant vs t 1.109 144x104 19.8.105 O Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 0.996 0.998 Average k:S- 18x10 Standard deviation of k:_ Rate = 3.78 xl0 [CV+] Differential Rate Law: %3D Integrated Rate Law: Fa: (3.71 x(o °) (17) + Torsa (3.77 x(0 ) (17) %3D FCVn = 6.43-106, Eいつ。 Diccussion:

loiV Inavi lo nolleo Attach: - Three data tables from Excel (one for each trial) showing the five columns described in the Procedure. - Three graphs for each trial (nine total) clearly showing the trendline and R2 for each graph. One to three graphs are allowed per page, and they should be clearly readable, taking up most of a page. Each graph must be no larger than a single page. Graph summary data: R2 for of In[CV] [CV+] vs t vs t 0,985 R2 for plot R2 for plot Reaction Rate of 1/[CV-] Order (k) 2nd and plot of Constant vs t 1.109 144x104 19.8.105 O Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 0.996 0.998 Average k:S- 18x10 Standard deviation of k:_ Rate = 3.78 xl0 [CV+] Differential Rate Law: %3D Integrated Rate Law: Fa: (3.71 x(o °) (17) + Torsa (3.77 x(0 ) (17) %3D FCVn = 6.43-106, Eいつ。 Diccussion:

Principles of Instrumental Analysis

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305577213

Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

Publisher:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

Chapter33: Automated Methods Of Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 33.6QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vM1SP346XBc&list=PLeJOSNLNZfHubfLdq0kOayASeUllMOGn4&index=4 I watched this the lecture video over and over and I am allowed to work with someone but I am having trouble with part B and I provided the YouTube link of the data or video attached to this lab
Hello, can someone please help me? I have already hand graphed 1 and 2 and found the v max, however I cannot find the Km value. I am confused because the plots on the linear weaver burk plot do not extend past the values that make up the line. So how am I supposed to estimate the value for the y-intercept in order to find the Km value
Good day I have asked this question already this question is from the lesson about refractometry and I belive that its about linear regression which I don't know how to get the missing value. 28-31. A calibration curve was created, and the results has beenestablished and showed in the table, Assume the following data, Supply the missing value. n 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.80 ??? 1.62 Conc. 10% 15% 25% 35% 22% ??? 28-29.a. 1.66 c. 1.70b. 1.68 d. 1.72 30-31.a. 14.24 c. 16.24b. 15.24 d.17.24
Show all steps leading to the final answer po. Here’s a pdf file in accordance with the topic po: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_FnDtXCrFKSol3RNWIG_9tNQ7IxgxD6t/view?usp=drivesdk
If 5 µM enzyme was used to obtain the data in the summary plot below, V-max = ________________ µM sec-1 and Km = ____________ µM for this enzyme (Enter numeric values to the nearest integer; Do NOT write units.)
There's 1 drink (and you are asked to determine the glucose concentration in the drink in the units of g/100mL. (Why these units? Well, once you have the concentrations in g/100mL you will be able to compare your values with the nutritional values given on the drink bottles’ labels). The sample of the drink was diluted 1/100 (i.e. by a factor of 100). This was an essential step in the method because, without it, the machine used to analyse the glucose concentration (spectrophotometer) would have given an error as the concentration would have been too high for accurate detection. What this means for you is that the dilution factor will need to be taken into consideration in your calculations (remember the aim is to calculate the concentration in the original drink and not in the diluted drink). You measured the concentration of their diluted drink using the spectrophotometer and their results were provided to them in the units mM (millimolar). Glucose Concentration in mM of drink =…
There's 1 drink (and you are asked to determine the glucose concentration in the drink in the units of g/100mL. (Why these units? Well, once you have the concentrations in g/100mL you will be able to compare your values with the nutritional values given on the drink bottles’ labels). The sample of the drink was diluted 1/100 (i.e. by a factor of 100). This was an essential step in the method because, without it, the machine used to analyse the glucose concentration (spectrophotometer) would have given an error as the concentration would have been too high for accurate detection. What this means for you is that the dilution factor will need to be taken into consideration in your calculations (remember the aim is to calculate the concentration in the original drink and not in the diluted drink). You measured the concentration of their diluted drink using the spectrophotometer and their results were provided to them in the units mM (millimolar). Glucose Concentration in mM of drink =…
Please answer atleast 4 sub-parts. Thank you.
You can’t excess the interactive so I write down what information was being presented.
Please answer super fast and answer all questions and show calculations For the image attached For 1. a Mass of metal: Trial 1 is 35.0228 g Trial 2 is 35.0915 g Trial 3 is 34.0821 g Mass of water: Trial 1 is 20.0177 g Trial 2 is 20.0250 g Trial 3 is 20.0168 g For delta t of water: Trial 1 is 15.5 C Trial 2 is 15.7 C Trial 3 is 15.1 C For delta t of metal Trial 1 is 80.1 C Trial 2 is 80.2 C Trial 3 is 79.5 C For B my calculated Specific heat is: Trial 1 is 0.462 Trial 2 is 0.467 Trial 3 is 0.466
how would u justify this question? my answer is correct i just do not understand the justification. this is a non graded practice worksheet
Time on hotplate (min) 60, 66, 68, 75, 85, 95, Mass of ZnCO3 + Filter paper (g) 3.7123, 2.7035, 2.6574, 2.5213, 2.3548, 2.239 Use the following data table and steps a-d below to calculate the concentration of the zinc carbonate. The mass of the filter paper alone (no ZnCO3) was 1.3457 g. The ZnNO3 solution (10.00 mL) was mixed with 15.00 mL of the 1.00 M Na2CO3. Calculate the mass of zinc carbonate formed. How many moles of zinc carbonate formed? Calculate the moles of zinc in the zinc nitrate solution used. Calculate the concentration of the zinc in the zinc nitrate solution.