May and Raj me the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the com. If they work independently, they will each earn
If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they call each earn
If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $1 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn
Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sole that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? A = Work independently; B = Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj’s earnings first, and Mary’s earnings second.)
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 10 Solutions
Principles of Economics 2e
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Managerial Accounting (5th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (11th Edition)
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
Cost Accounting (15th Edition)
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
- Milly and Rob are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn $100. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn $150. If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn $0 and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn $200. The table represents the choices available to Milly and Rob. What is the dominant strategy for Milly ? Milly Keeps Producing Milly Lowers Output Rob Keeps Producing $100, $100 $200, $0 Rob Lowers Output $0, $200 $150, $150 Group of answer choices Milly should keep producing Milly should work independently from Rob Mily should lower outputarrow_forwardMercedes Benz seem to win every time with their social media campaigns. The one that stands out to me was back in 2013 when they created what I still believe to be one of the best Instagram marketing campaigns to date. Mercedes wanted to reach out to the younger audience so they hired five top Instagram photographers to each take the wheel of a new Mercedes CLA. Whoever got the most likes got to keep the car – so they all really worked at it! By the end of the campaign, Mercedes has received: 87,000,000 organic Instagram impressions 2,000,000 Instagram likes 150 new marketing assets (stunning photos) Q1. What lessons can you learn from this? Could you put your followers up for a challenge and make it into a competition or campaign? Q2. Can you do a competition that gets people trying out your product first? Q3. Think about your target audience. What is a prize they would value? Q4. Like Mercedes you could recruit bloggers/influencers via social media and get them blogging about your…arrow_forwardUrgently need the answerarrow_forward
- Rod and Todd Flanders have been working jobs in HR that pay $40,000 and $20,000 per year, respectively. They are trying to decide whether to quit their jobs and jointly open a snow cone shack, which they estimate can earn $100,000 per year. According to the Nonstrategic view of bargaining, how will the snow cone shack proceeds be split? Rod and Todd Flanders have been working jobs in HR that pay $40,000 and $20,000 per year, respectively. They are trying to decide whether to quit their jobs and jointly open a snow cone shack, which they estimate can earn $100,000 per year. According to the Nonstrategic view of bargaining, how will the snow cone shack proceeds be split? Rod gets $50,000 and Todd gets $50,000 Rod gets $66,666.67 and Todd gets $33,333.33 they won't quit their jobs. Rod gets $60,000 and Todd gets $40,000arrow_forwardSuppose we have two identical fırms A and B, selling identical products. They are the only firms in the market and compete by choosing quantities at the same time. The Market demand curve is given by P=390-Q. The only cost is a constant marginal cost of $14. Suppose Firm A produces a quantity of 57 and Firm B produces a quantity of 44. If Firm A decides to increase its quantity by 1 unit while Firm B continues to produce the same 44 units, what is the Marginal Revenue for Firm A from this extra unit? Enter a number only, no $ sign. Don't forget to include the negative sign if revenue decreases. 231arrow_forward= Two firms sell substitutable products; the market price is: P = 90-Q, where Q Q₁ + Q₂ is the total market quantity, which consists of Q₁ (the quantity produced by Firm 1) and Q₂ (the quantity produced by Firm 2). The firms choose their quantities simultaneously. Firm 1's costs are C₁ = 10- 6Q₁ +Q². Firm 2's costs are C₂ = Q². Which is the best response function for Firm 2? O O O O Q₂ = 15. 1 Q₂ = 30 - ²0₁₁ 3 Q₂ = 42 + ²³² Q₁₁ 2 = 1. 3 Q₂ = 45. What is the equilibrium market quantity Q? O Q = 15.25. O Q = 30. Q = 46.5. O Q = 50. What is the equilibrium market price P? O P = 90. O P = 60. O P = 43.5. O P = 10.arrow_forward
- QUESTION 8 Appel and Samseng were 2 rival companies in producing smartphones but both have recently been bought by a billionaire, Eelon Mask. Appel is able to produce 500 phone processors in one day or assemble 600 phones in one day. Samseng is able to produce 430 phone processors in one day or assemble 550 phones in one day. Eelon wants both companies to specialise so he can maximise their output. Select the item from the list provided to make the following statements true. - - ✓ Appel has absolute advantage in ✓ Opportunity cost of Samseng assembling 1 phone is ✓ Samseng has in assembling phones. 1. producing 1.20 phone processors 2. absolute advantage 3. both producing phone processors and assembling phones 4. producing 0.78 phone processors 5. producing 0.83 phone processors 6. neither absolute nor comparative advantage 7. neither producing phone processors nor assembling phones 8. comparative advantage 9. assembling phones 10. producing 1.28 phone processors 11. producing phone…arrow_forwardIn a market there are five firms, all have a total cost curve equal to CT = 2q. The market demand is Q = 500 - 5P. How much profit would each firm get if they collude and share the market equitably? What is the profit to each firm if they agree to collude, but one firm misleads the others charging a slightly lower price? What is the profit if all firms do not collude and compete via price?arrow_forwardIn Brazil, coffee beans are cultivated by a very large number of small farms that all produce beansof similar quality and taste at similar costs. Land is still plentiful, and the equipment required isaffordable enough to allow new farming businesses to start up under current market conditions.However, better production techniques, especially alternatives to polluting fertilisers anddeforestation, are needed in this industry. Using the theory and models of industry structure, examinethis industry. Should government be worried about any aspect of how an industry with this marketstructure will perform?arrow_forward
- Suppose Ishmael and Santiago are the only two fishermen who fish in Lake Hardin. Each must choose between fishing for 20 hours per week or for 40 hours per week. If both choose to fish for 20 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $3,000 per week. If both choose to fish for 40 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $2,000 per week. If Santiago fishes for 40 hours per week, and Ishmael fishes for 20 hours per week, then Santiago can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Ishmael can earn a profit of $1,000 per week. If Ishmael fishes for 40 hours per week, and Santiago fishes for 20 hours per week, then Ishmael can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Santiago can earn a profit of $1,000 per week. a. Construct the weekly payoff matrix for this situation. Ishmael 20 Hours 40 Hours Santiago 20 Hours $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael 40 Hours $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael b. What is the equilibrium outcome…arrow_forwardThe correct solutions are posted with the questions. Please show work for the answers listed Frankie and Johnny own competing motorcycle shops. They face a demand curve P = 200 – 3Q, where Q is the total number of motorcycles produced by both Frankie and Johnny. Each shop faces a marginal cost of production of 20. A) If Frankie and Johnny must decide their production levels at the same time, what is the Nash equilibrium level of production for each shop? Answer: q*= 20 B) Suppose Frankie gets to make his production decision first. What is the Nash equilibrium level of production for each firm? Answer: Frankie: 30 and Johnny:15 C) How much would Johnny be willing to pay to keep Frankie from making his decision first? Answer: $525arrow_forwardConsider two industries, each comprising ten firms. In industry A, the largest firm has a market share of 49 percent. The next three firms have market shares of 7 percent each, and the remaining six firms have equal shares of 5 percent each. In industry B, the top four firms share the bulk of the market with 19 percent apiece. The next largest firm accounts for 14 percent, and the smallest five firms equally split the remaining 10 percent of the industry. a. Compute the four-firm concentration ratio and HI for each industry. Compare these measures across the two industries. Which industry do you think truly exhibits a more competitive structure? Which measure do you think gives a better indication of this? Explain. b. Now let the three second largest firms in industry A merge their operations while holding onto their combined 21 percent market share. Recalculate the HI for industry A. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning