To think critically about: When asked in an interview a situation that if you were ethically challenged, do you tell the truth or lie that you have never done anything wrong? Introduction: Business organizations now increasingly emphasize workplace ethics. Therefore, during job interviews, there are chances of questions relating to situations where candidates are ethically challenged being asked.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 15CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about:

When asked in an interview a situation that if you were ethically challenged, do you tell the truth or lie that you have never done anything wrong?

Introduction:

Business organizations now increasingly emphasize workplace ethics. Therefore, during job interviews, there are chances of questions relating to situations where candidates are ethically challenged being asked.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Describe some virtues of the ethical codes of conduct adopted by professional societies such as the ACM and IEEE-CS, and list some shortcomings of these professional codes as well. In the final analysis, do the advantages of having a code outweigh the prospects of not having one? Use either an actual or a hypothetical case to establish the main points in your answer. Once you have assessed the individual strengths and weaknesses of professional codes, determine whether the overall benefits of having professional codes outweighs the disadvantages of not having them. Apply your conclusion to the following case: SCENARIO: Shutting Down the Original Napster Web Site Napster, a very popular site for sharing music online in the late 1990s, was founded by Shawn Fanning while he was a student at North Eastern University. Napster’s users were able to exchange copyrighted music files, in MP3 format, with one another. In December 1999, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued the…

What ethical and legal obligations do employees have to refrain from badmouthing their employers in a fit of pique, especially on the firm’s own website? Should management allow employees to criticize the company without fear of retaliation? Could management benefit from allowing such criticism? Why or why not?

according to an ethics expert ,''we judge ourselves by our best intentionsand most noble acts,but we're judged by others by our last worst act.''Does it mean that in ethics there is an inherent double standard? can you think of two situations wherea person responding to an ethical dilema and interested observers had different evaluations of these persons actions?