EBK ECONOMICS TODAY
18th Edition
ISBN: 9780133920116
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 2FCT
To determine
Reason to substitute own utility assessments for those of people that officials seek to nudge.
Expert Solution & Answer
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Students have asked these similar questions
Which political philosophy's prime objective is to raise total utility?
Question 38 options:
liberalism
libertarianism
utilitarianism
communitarianism
The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In the discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called closing the Washington monument. When agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a Budget cut, it may decide to close a high visibility attraction enjoyed by many people like the Washington monument. Explain in the terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington monument strategy is so misleading if you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington monument strategy cut the items with the highest or lowest.
The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called “closing the Washington Monument.” When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is so misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility?
Chapter 20 Solutions
EBK ECONOMICS TODAY
Ch. 20.F - Prob. 1PCh. 20.F - Prob. 2PCh. 20.F - Prob. 3PCh. 20.F - Prob. 4PCh. 20.F - Prob. 5PCh. 20.F - Prob. 6PCh. 20.F - Prob. 7PCh. 20.F - Prob. 8PCh. 20.F - Prob. 9PCh. 20.F - Prob. 10P
Ch. 20 - Prob. 20.1LOCh. 20 - Prob. 20.2LOCh. 20 - Prob. 20.3LOCh. 20 - Prob. 20.4LOCh. 20 - Prob. aFCTCh. 20 - Prob. bFCTCh. 20 - Prob. cFCTCh. 20 - Prob. 1CTQCh. 20 - Prob. 2CTQCh. 20 - Prob. 1FCTCh. 20 - Prob. 2FCTCh. 20 - Prob. 1PCh. 20 - Prob. 2PCh. 20 - Prob. 3PCh. 20 - Prob. 4PCh. 20 - Prob. 5PCh. 20 - Prob. 6PCh. 20 - Prob. 7PCh. 20 - Prob. 8PCh. 20 - Prob. 9PCh. 20 - Prob. 10PCh. 20 - Prob. 11PCh. 20 - Prob. 12PCh. 20 - Prob. 13PCh. 20 - Prob. 14PCh. 20 - Prob. 15PCh. 20 - Prob. 16PCh. 20 - Prob. 17P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Peer pressure is an important influence on the behavior of youngsters. For instance, many preteens begin smoking because their friends pressure them into being “cool” by smoking. Using utility theory, how would you explain peer pressure? How would this compare with the explanations provided by behavioral economics and neuroeconomics?arrow_forwardSean is arguing with his girlfriend, Yvette. They have been going out for a little more than two years. YVETTE: I'm leaving you, Sean. Get over it. SEAN: Are you saying that being single will make you happier than you've been with me? Speaking personally, I think the utility we've had in this relationship was much more than you could have had if you'd been single this whole time! YVETTE: I had taken an economics class and the word "utility" rings a bell. It's not that at all. We've had a fine time. It's that the utility I would get by continuing our relationship isn't worth it anymore. SEAN: I've never been dumped by someone citing the law of before. You're a piece of work, you know that? Yvette doesn't hear. She has already walked off, leaving Sean feeling like something of a sunk cost.arrow_forwardOn Sundays, people in Los Angeles consider a boat to Catalina Island to spend the day on the beach there. The utility that a person gets from visiting Catalina is 1-[n/10] – p , where n is the number of visitors on the island and p is the price of round-trip transportation (by boat). (Note that a visitor obtains more satisfaction if there are fewer other visitors on the island). The utility of staying home is zero. In equilibrium, how many people visit the island on a given Sunday? ( Your answer should depend on p.)arrow_forward
- What do you think of the ethics of using unconscious nudges to alter people’s behavior? Before you answer, consider the following argument made by economists Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, who favor the use of nudges. They argue that in most situations, we couldn’t avoid nudging even if we wanted to because whatever policy we choose will contain some set of unconscious nudges and incentives that will influence people. Thus, they say, we might as well choose the wisest set of nudges.arrow_forwardDonuts are a big thing in Portland, OR. You go into one of the many donut establishments to purchase some number of these tasty (and even vegan or gluten free if required) treats. Let's say that the first donut has higher utility for you, so you are willing to pay up to $2 for it. For the second donut you are willing to pay $1.50, the third $1, a fourth $0.50 and the fifth $0.00. This particular bakery in Portland charges an average of $1 per donut. If you are a rational buyer (which can be hard when faced with so many different delicious donuts) then how many donuts do you purchase, and how much consumer surplus (i.e., money saved compared to what you were willing to spend) do you have? O 4 donuts, $5 O 2 donuts, $5 O 3 donuts, $1.50 O 1 donut, $0.50arrow_forwardWhat can a marketer do to positively influence a situation in which a consumer is ready to buy but has not yet done so?arrow_forward
- When consumers have a budget, their utility is maximized by buying a combination of goods such that the marginal utility per dollar is the same for all of these goods. This is because if this were not the case, it would mean that the consumer hadn't used up their entire budget. of their insatiability. if a consumer could get higher marginal utility from one good than from others, they would want to buy more of that good, and less of others. if a consumer could get higher marginal utility from one good than from others, they would want to buy less of that good, and more of others. it guarantees them some variety.arrow_forwardWhat are concerns that some people have with the use of consumer decision nudges by governments?arrow_forwardAlex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some…arrow_forward
- Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year. Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014 James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which gives him a utility of 0.5. He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter, Nathan will not do it for free and wants some money…arrow_forwardAn economics professor finds that he strictly prefers a $10 bottle of wine over an $8 bottle, and a $12 bottle over a $10 bottle, and so on, but an $8 bottle over a $200 bottle. Explain why this makes him irrational according to a behavioral economics theory.arrow_forwardPlease explain in detail Utility Theory and its role in consumer choice and public decision makingarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285859460/9781285859460_smallCoverImage.gif)