MICROECONOMICS(LL); CNCT 21 2018 >IP<
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260389470
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 26, Problem 3RQ
To determine
The comparative and absolute advantage of making a bicycle.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products— baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fishIn what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1 2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata:
Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish
Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 7 cans tuna fish
a. In what product should each nation specialize?
Canswicki should produce _____- , and Tunata should produce _____
b. Would the following terms of trade be acceptable to both nations?
i. 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish: yes or no
ii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 8 cans tuna fish: yes or no
iii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 5.5 cans tuna fish: yes or no
American apparel makers complain to Congress about competition from China. Congress decides to impose either a tariff or a quota on apparel imports from China. Which policy would Chinese apparel manufacturers prefer? LO26.4 a. Tariff. b. Quota.
Chapter 26 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS(LL); CNCT 21 2018 >IP<
Ch. 26.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 26 - Prob. 1DQCh. 26 - Prob. 2DQCh. 26 - Prob. 3DQCh. 26 - Prob. 4DQCh. 26 - Prob. 5DQCh. 26 - Prob. 6DQ
Ch. 26 - Prob. 7DQCh. 26 - Prob. 8DQCh. 26 - Prob. 9DQCh. 26 - Prob. 10DQCh. 26 - Prob. 11DQCh. 26 - Prob. 12DQCh. 26 - Prob. 13DQCh. 26 - Prob. 14DQCh. 26 - Prob. 1RQCh. 26 - Prob. 2RQCh. 26 - Prob. 3RQCh. 26 - Prob. 4RQCh. 26 - Prob. 5RQCh. 26 - Prob. 6RQCh. 26 - Prob. 7RQCh. 26 - Prob. 8RQCh. 26 - Prob. 9RQCh. 26 - Prob. 10RQCh. 26 - Prob. 11RQCh. 26 - Prob. 12RQCh. 26 - Prob. 13RQCh. 26 - Prob. 1PCh. 26 - Prob. 2PCh. 26 - Prob. 3PCh. 26 - Prob. 4P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries? How would rising costs (rather than constant costs) affect the extent of specialization and trade between these two countries?arrow_forwardNow suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries. What is one potential price of metal ores in terms of trucks at which both Zimbabwe and South Africa would benefit from trade? Rank the autarkic prices and the world price of metal ores from lowest to highest.arrow_forward2. In the USA 1 unit of labor can produce 50 cars while in Canada 1 unit of labor can produce5 cars. The total amount of labor in each country is L = 100. Which one of these statements iscorrect?A. Canada has comparative advantage on the production of cars.B. The USA has comparative advantage on the production of cars.C. Since their production possibility frontiers are the similar neither country has comparativeadvantage on the production of cars.D. Not enough information to answer this question.arrow_forward
- Q58 Suppose Spain is currently producing 90 units of wine and 10 units of cheese, but to produce 10 more units of cheese it must sacrifice 30 units of wine. Further, suppose that Portugal produces 45 units of wine and 45 units of cheese, but to produce 10 more units of cheese it must sacrifice only 10 units of wine. It can be concluded that... a. More information is needed to conclude anything about comparative advantage in either country. b. Portugal has an absolute advantage in wine production and Spain has an absolute advantage in cheese production. c. Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and Portugal has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese. d. Spain has an absolute advantage in both wine and cheese production. e. Portugal has an absolute advantage in both wine and cheese production.arrow_forwardSuppose that the United States limits the amount of steel that can be imported from other countries. Using a PPF that puts units of steel on the horizontal axis and units of another good, such as food, on the vertical axis, explain how such a steel import quota will affect production of food and steel in the United States and alter our consumption possibilities. Will the quota make the United States better off as a whole? If not, will it make anyone in the United States better off? Explain. For 19.21, think of the PPF as that of steel produced in the United States and food produced in the United States (and not as total steel available for use in the United States)arrow_forwardAssume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. France’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. Suppose that Germany does not specialize in the production of the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage but it opens up for trade at the autarky production level. Compare the welfare of the country with the case when country specializes.arrow_forward
- sugar, You have been asked to analyze the opportunity costs and comparative advantages to recommend an efficient trading relationship. Consider the production data provided. Prepare a brief report that: 3. Calculate and compare the opportunity costs of producing 1 unit of corn and 1 unit of sugar in each country. Which country has the lower opportunity cost for each good? 2. Determine which good each country has a comparative advantage in producing sugar and which one has a comparative advantage in producing corn. Explain your analysis. 3. Recommend a trading relationship that allows the countries to specialize based on comparative advantage. How would trade Improve economic efficiency? 4. Think about your own interests, skills, and opportunities. In what areas do you potentially have a comparative advantage over your peers or co-workers? Are there goods or services you could provide to others more efficiently? How could you maximize your advantages to achieve positive gains from trade…arrow_forward1. Suppose there are two countries Peru and Japan that produce Food and Fuel. Peru can produce 7,523 units of Food or 17,853 units of Fuel using a labour force of 8000. Japan can produce 5,733 units of Food or 24,156 units of Fuel using a labour force of 5000. a) Which country has the comparative advantage in food? In fuel? Explain. b) Which good(s) should each country specialize in? c) Discuss the benefits of specialization for each country.arrow_forwardConsider a two country, two goods, one factor (labor) model of international trade. Suppose home country require 1 units of labor to produce a unit of cloth and 1 unit of labor to produce a unit of wine (regardless of output levels). Foreign country requires 2 unit of labor to produce 1 unit of cloth and 1.5 units of labor to produce 1 unit of wine (regardless of output levels). (a) Which country has the comparative advantage in producing wine? Justify your answer. (b) Which country has the absolute advantage in producing wine? (c) Which country will have higher autarky price of wine in terms of cloth? (d) Suppose after trade, the international relative price settles at a level strictly between the autarky relative prices of the two countries. At the trade equilibrium, show which country will produce wine and which country will produce cloth.arrow_forward
- P1. Let’s assume there are only 2 countries that produce 2 good. More specifically, suppose that the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) each have 2 units of productive resources, 1 used to produce Wine, the other Cloth. The US can produce 40 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 40 units of Cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. The UK can produce 20 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 10 units of cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. Using this information, please answer the questions below: 1. What are the gains from trade? 2. What is the “range” of potential exchange rates between US and UK?arrow_forwardP1. Let’s assume there are only 2 countries that produce 2 good. More specifically, suppose that the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) each have 2 units of productive resources, 1 used to produce Wine, the other Cloth. The US can produce 40 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 40 units of Cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. The UK can produce 20 units of Wine with 1 unit of productive resources and 10 units of cloth with 1 unit of productive resources. Using this information, please answer the questions below: *Who has an absolute advantage in the production of Wine? Cloth? *Who has a comparative advantage in the production of Wine? Cloth? *Given specialization, what is production before trade? After trade? *What are the gains from trade? *What is the “range” of potential exchange rates between US and UK? P2. Suppose that in Japan, without a tariff 10,000 cars will be sold per year at an equilibrium price of $20,000. With a $5,000 tariff,…arrow_forwardWith respect to Table 2.5, indicate in each case the commodity in which each nation has a comparative advantage. Suppose that the US exchanges 4W for 4C with the UK. How much does the US gain in terms of cloth? How much does the UK gain in terms of cloth? What is the range for mutually beneficial trade?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc