MICROECONOMICS(LL); CNCT 21 2018 >IP<
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260389470
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 26, Problem 7RQ
To determine
The reason for the lack of complete specialization.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products— baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fishIn what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1 2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?
American apparel makers complain to Congress about competition from China. Congress decides to impose either a tariff or a quota on apparel imports from China. Which policy would Chinese apparel manufacturers prefer? LO26.4 a. Tariff. b. Quota.
Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries? How would rising costs (rather than constant costs) affect the extent of specialization and trade between these two countries?
Chapter 26 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS(LL); CNCT 21 2018 >IP<
Ch. 26.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 26.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 26 - Prob. 1DQCh. 26 - Prob. 2DQCh. 26 - Prob. 3DQCh. 26 - Prob. 4DQCh. 26 - Prob. 5DQCh. 26 - Prob. 6DQ
Ch. 26 - Prob. 7DQCh. 26 - Prob. 8DQCh. 26 - Prob. 9DQCh. 26 - Prob. 10DQCh. 26 - Prob. 11DQCh. 26 - Prob. 12DQCh. 26 - Prob. 13DQCh. 26 - Prob. 14DQCh. 26 - Prob. 1RQCh. 26 - Prob. 2RQCh. 26 - Prob. 3RQCh. 26 - Prob. 4RQCh. 26 - Prob. 5RQCh. 26 - Prob. 6RQCh. 26 - Prob. 7RQCh. 26 - Prob. 8RQCh. 26 - Prob. 9RQCh. 26 - Prob. 10RQCh. 26 - Prob. 11RQCh. 26 - Prob. 12RQCh. 26 - Prob. 13RQCh. 26 - Prob. 1PCh. 26 - Prob. 2PCh. 26 - Prob. 3PCh. 26 - Prob. 4P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 7 cans tuna fish a. In what product should each nation specialize? Canswicki should produce _____- , and Tunata should produce _____ b. Would the following terms of trade be acceptable to both nations? i. 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish: yes or no ii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 8 cans tuna fish: yes or no iii. 1 can baby formula ≡ 5.5 cans tuna fish: yes or noarrow_forward1. Suppose there are two countries Peru and Japan that produce Food and Fuel. Peru can produce 7,523 units of Food or 17,853 units of Fuel using a labour force of 8000. Japan can produce 5,733 units of Food or 24,156 units of Fuel using a labour force of 5000. a) Which country has the comparative advantage in food? In fuel? Explain. b) Which good(s) should each country specialize in? c) Discuss the benefits of specialization for each country.arrow_forwardNow suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries. What is one potential price of metal ores in terms of trucks at which both Zimbabwe and South Africa would benefit from trade? Rank the autarkic prices and the world price of metal ores from lowest to highest.arrow_forward
- 2. In the USA 1 unit of labor can produce 50 cars while in Canada 1 unit of labor can produce5 cars. The total amount of labor in each country is L = 100. Which one of these statements iscorrect?A. Canada has comparative advantage on the production of cars.B. The USA has comparative advantage on the production of cars.C. Since their production possibility frontiers are the similar neither country has comparativeadvantage on the production of cars.D. Not enough information to answer this question.arrow_forwardSuppose that the United States limits the amount of steel that can be imported from other countries. Using a PPF that puts units of steel on the horizontal axis and units of another good, such as food, on the vertical axis, explain how such a steel import quota will affect production of food and steel in the United States and alter our consumption possibilities. Will the quota make the United States better off as a whole? If not, will it make anyone in the United States better off? Explain. For 19.21, think of the PPF as that of steel produced in the United States and food produced in the United States (and not as total steel available for use in the United States)arrow_forwardAssume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. France’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. Suppose that Germany does not specialize in the production of the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage but it opens up for trade at the autarky production level. Compare the welfare of the country with the case when country specializes.arrow_forward
- Answer th following: If Nation 2 is to enter trade. In what good will it specialize? Why? If Nation 2 is to specialize in the good of its comparative advantage, how much good X and good Y will Nation 2 produce? Suppose after specialization, Nation 2 exports 100 units of the good of its comparative advantage [your answer in 1], how much of X and Y will it consumer after trade Will Nation 2 enjoy welfare gains from trade? Provide evidencearrow_forwardSuppose that Poland and Wales both produce ale and glass. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 4 kegs of ale while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a pane of glass is 12 kegs of ale. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing glass in the two countries, you can tell thatWales has a comparative advantage in the production of glass andPoland has a comparative advantage in the production of ale. Suppose that Poland and Wales consider trading glass and ale with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of ale for each pane of glass it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of glass for each keg of ale it exports to Poland. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of glass in terms of ale) would allow both Wales and Poland to gain from trade? Check all that apply. 8 kegs of…arrow_forwardSuppose that the productivity per worker in the milk and cranberry juice industries of Southland and Northland are as follows: Output in Thousands of Litres Milk Cranberry Juice Northland 6 Or 3 Sounthland 2 Or 1 a) Which country has the absolute advantage in producing milk? b) Which country has the absolute advantage in producing cranberry juice? c) Which country has the comparative advantage in producing milk? d) Which country has the comparative advantage in producing cranberry juice? e) According to the theory of comparative advantage, will there be trade? If yes, what is the direction of trade?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc