Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780534380588
Author: Wayne L. Winston
Publisher: Brooks Cole
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 3.3, Problem 7P
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
- If a linear
programming (LP) feasible region is not unbounded, then one can say that the LP’s feasible region is bounded. - If the feasible region is bounded or feasible region is closed, the number of its extreme points or geometrically the number of vertices of a hyper polyhedron is a multidimensional space is always finite.
- A LP function attains its optimal values either in a single extreme point or a values combination of extreme points.
- So, simply checking the z-values at each of the feasible region’s extreme points. If region is unbounded, the objective function may not attain its optimal at all, or the region may have no feasible extreme points.
- If the feasible region is bounded, but not unbounded or close, all values are bounded...
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
In regards of the problem:max cTx subject to Ax = b, with an optimal solution of value v. Suppose the problem min cT x, subject to Ax = b have great with the same value, v. It can be concluded that there is a singlegood point for both? How is the feasible region geometrically?
In this question you will explore the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP).
(a) In every instance (i.e., example) of the TSP, we are given n cities, where each pair of cities is connected by a weighted edge that measures the cost of traveling between those two cities. Our goal is to find the optimal TSP tour, minimizing the total cost of a Hamiltonian cycle in G.
Although it is NP-complete to solve the TSP, we found a simple 2-approximation by first generating a minimum-weight spanning tree of G and using this output to determine our TSP tour.
Prove that our output is guaranteed to be a 2-approximation, provided the Triangle Inequality holds. In other words, if OP T is the total cost of the optimal solution, and AP P is the total cost of our approximate solution, clearly explain why AP P ≤ 2 × OP T.
Why any LP with an optimal solution has an optimal basic feasible solution?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Ch. 3.1 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 5P
Ch. 3.2 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.7 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.11 - Show that Finco’s objective function may also be...Ch. 3.11 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 4PCh. 3 - Prob. 1RPCh. 3 - Prob. 2RPCh. 3 - Prob. 3RPCh. 3 - Prob. 4RPCh. 3 - Prob. 5RPCh. 3 - Prob. 6RPCh. 3 - Prob. 7RPCh. 3 - Prob. 8RPCh. 3 - Prob. 9RPCh. 3 - Prob. 10RPCh. 3 - Prob. 11RPCh. 3 - Prob. 12RPCh. 3 - Prob. 13RPCh. 3 - Prob. 14RPCh. 3 - Prob. 15RPCh. 3 - Prob. 16RPCh. 3 - Prob. 17RPCh. 3 - Prob. 18RPCh. 3 - Prob. 19RPCh. 3 - Prob. 20RPCh. 3 - Prob. 21RPCh. 3 - Prob. 22RPCh. 3 - Prob. 23RPCh. 3 - Prob. 24RPCh. 3 - Prob. 25RPCh. 3 - Prob. 26RPCh. 3 - Prob. 27RPCh. 3 - Prob. 28RPCh. 3 - Prob. 29RPCh. 3 - Prob. 30RPCh. 3 - Graphically find all solutions to the following...Ch. 3 - Prob. 32RPCh. 3 - Prob. 33RPCh. 3 - Prob. 34RPCh. 3 - Prob. 35RPCh. 3 - Prob. 36RPCh. 3 - Prob. 37RPCh. 3 - Prob. 38RPCh. 3 - Prob. 39RPCh. 3 - Prob. 40RPCh. 3 - Prob. 41RPCh. 3 - Prob. 42RPCh. 3 - Prob. 43RPCh. 3 - Prob. 44RPCh. 3 - Prob. 45RPCh. 3 - Prob. 46RPCh. 3 - Prob. 47RPCh. 3 - Prob. 48RPCh. 3 - Prob. 49RPCh. 3 - Prob. 50RPCh. 3 - Prob. 51RPCh. 3 - Prob. 52RPCh. 3 - Prob. 53RPCh. 3 - Prob. 54RPCh. 3 - Prob. 56RPCh. 3 - Prob. 57RPCh. 3 - Prob. 58RPCh. 3 - Prob. 59RPCh. 3 - Prob. 60RPCh. 3 - Prob. 61RPCh. 3 - Prob. 62RPCh. 3 - Prob. 63RP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Consider the following LP and its optimal tableau: max z = 3x1 + 2x2s.t. 2x1 + 5x2 ≤ 8 3x1 + 7x2 ≤ 10 x1, x2 ≥ 0 a) Find the dual of this LP and its optimal solution. b) Find the range of values of b2 for which the current basis remains optimal. Also find the new optimal solution if b2 = 5.arrow_forwardUsing the image provided, please answer the following questions. (a). Find a path from a to g in the graph G using the search strategy of depth-first search. Is the returned solution path an optimal one? Give your explanation and remarks on "why-optimal" or "why-non-optimal". (b). Find a path from a to g in the graph G using the search strategy of breadth-first search. Is the returned solution path an optimal one? Give your explanation and remarks on "why-optimal" or "why-non-optimal".(c). Find a path from a to g in the graph G using the search strategy of least-cost first search. Is the returned solution path an optimal one? Give your explanation and remarks on "why-optimal" or "why-non-optimal". (d). Find a path from a to g in the graph G using the search strategy of best-first search. The heuristics for these nodes are: h(a,25); h(b, 43); h(c,5); h(d, 64); h(g, 0). Is the returned solution path an optimal one? Give your explanation and remarks on "why-optimal or "why-non-optimal".…arrow_forwardPractice Test Questions: Prove each of the following statements, or give a counterexample: Best-first search is optimal in the case where we have a perfect heuristic (i.e., h(n) = h∗(n), the true cost to the closest goal state). Suppose there is a unique optimal solution. Then, A* search with a perfect heuristic will never expand nodes that are not in the path of the optimal solution. A* search with a heuristic which is admissible but not consistent is complete.arrow_forward
Recommended textbooks for you
- Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks Cole
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Brooks Cole