EBK BASICS OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY
2nd Edition
ISBN: 8220100255052
Author: Blank
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 61P
To determine
Calculate the present worth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
A process can be completed using either Alternative X or Y, where Y is an automated version of X. Alternative X has fixed costs of $10,000 per year with a variable cost of $50 per unit. If the process is automated, the fixed cost for Y will be $5,000 per year and its variable cost will be only $30 per unit. The minimum number of units that must be produced each year for alternative Y to be favored is closest to:a. Alternative Y will be favored for any level of productionb. 125c. 375d. Alternative X will be favored for any level of production
Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively.
Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.
Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively.
Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors.
(Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return.
The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.
Chapter 4 Solutions
EBK BASICS OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY
Ch. 4 - State two conditions under which the do-nothing...Ch. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - The costs associated with manufacturing a...
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 12PCh. 4 - Prob. 13PCh. 4 - Prob. 14PCh. 4 - Prob. 15PCh. 4 - Prob. 16PCh. 4 - Prob. 17PCh. 4 - Prob. 18PCh. 4 - Prob. 19PCh. 4 - Prob. 20PCh. 4 - Prob. 21PCh. 4 - Prob. 22PCh. 4 - Prob. 23PCh. 4 - Prob. 24PCh. 4 - Prob. 25PCh. 4 - Prob. 26PCh. 4 - Prob. 27PCh. 4 - Prob. 28PCh. 4 - Prob. 29PCh. 4 - Prob. 30PCh. 4 - Prob. 31PCh. 4 - Two mutually exclusive projects have the estimated...Ch. 4 - Prob. 33PCh. 4 - Prob. 34PCh. 4 - Prob. 35PCh. 4 - Prob. 36PCh. 4 - Prob. 37PCh. 4 - The manager of engineering at the 900-megawatt...Ch. 4 - Prob. 39PCh. 4 - Prob. 40PCh. 4 - Prob. 41PCh. 4 - Three different plans were presented to the GAO by...Ch. 4 - The U.S. Army received two proposals for a turnkey...Ch. 4 - Prob. 44PCh. 4 - Prob. 45PCh. 4 - Prob. 46PCh. 4 - Prob. 47PCh. 4 - Prob. 48PCh. 4 - Prob. 49PCh. 4 - Prob. 50PCh. 4 - Prob. 51PCh. 4 - Prob. 52PCh. 4 - Prob. 53PCh. 4 - Prob. 54PCh. 4 - Prob. 55PCh. 4 - Prob. 56PCh. 4 - Prob. 57PCh. 4 - Prob. 58PCh. 4 - Prob. 59PCh. 4 - Prob. 60PCh. 4 - Prob. 61PCh. 4 - Prob. 62PCh. 4 - Prob. 63APQCh. 4 - Prob. 64APQCh. 4 - Prob. 65APQCh. 4 - Prob. 66APQCh. 4 - Prob. 67APQCh. 4 - Prob. 68APQCh. 4 - Prob. 69APQCh. 4 - Prob. 70APQCh. 4 - Prob. 71APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forwardEP Electric has identified two new methods to treat its cooling water. Alternative I (for inflow) would treat the raw water with a conventional reverse osmosis system so that the cycles of concentration could be increased from 5 to 20. This will result in water cost savings of $360,000 per year and chemical cost savings of $56,000 per year. The initial cost of the equipment will be $2.3 million with an operating cost of $125,000 per year. Alternative B (for blowdown) will treat the cooling tower blowdown water using a highpressure seawater reverse osmosis system to recover most of the water that is sent to an evaporation pond. This option will result in water savings of $270,000 per year. The cost of the system will be $1.2 million with an operating cost of $105,000 per year. Assuming one of the two methods must be installed, determine which is preferred on the basis of the incremental ROR value using MARR of 5% per year, which is a typically low return expected of government projects.…arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $550,000, an AOC of $160,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $830,000 with an AOC of $120,000, and a $240,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a 3-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of method 2 will be 35% higher after 3 years than it is after 5 years. If the MARR is 10% per year, which method should the company selectarrow_forward
- A company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary-indexing spindles is considering an upgrade of production equipment to reduce costs over the next 5 years. The company can invest $80,000 now, 1 year from now, or 2 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. The saving estimates are $26,000, $31,000, or $37,000 per year if the investment is made now, 1 year from now, or 2 years from now, respectively. The company will only invest if the ROR is at least 20% per year. Using a future worth analysis, determine if the timing of the investment will affect the return requirement and, if so, when the investment should be made. Solve by (a) hand, and (b) spreadsheet.arrow_forwardThe Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used to produce solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $800,000, an AOC of $150,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $910,000 with an AOC of $125,000 and a $230,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a three-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of Method 2 will be 40% higher after three years than it is after five years. If the MARR is 14% per year, which method should the company select? Which method should the company select?arrow_forward
- UPS Freight plans to spend $100 million on new long-haul tractor-trailers. Some of these vehicles will include a new shelving design with adjustable shelves to transport irregularly sized freight that requires special handling during loading and unloading. Though the life is relatively short, the director wants a capitalized cost analysis performed on the two final designs. Compare the alternatives at the MARR of 10% per year using (a) tabulated factors, and (b) a spreadsheet.arrow_forwardA food processing company is considering two types of moisture analyzers. Only one can be selected. The company expects an infrared model to yield a rate of return of 27% per year. A more expensive microwave model will yield a rate of return of 19% per year. If the company’s MARR is 19% per year, can you determine which model should be purchased solely on the basis of the overall rate of return information provided? Why or why not?arrow_forwardThe rate of return for alternative X is 18% per year and for alternative Y is 17% per year, with Y requiring a larger initial investment. If a company has a minimum attractive rate of return of 16% per year, a)The company should select alternative X. b)The company should select alternative Y. c)The company should conduct an incremental analysis between X and Y to select the economically better alternative. d)The company should select the do-nothing alternative.arrow_forward
- An engineer must decide between two ways to pump concrete to the top of a seven-story building. Plan 1 requires the leasing of equipment for $60,000 initially and will cost between $0.40 and $0.95 per metric ton to operate, with a most likely cost of $0.50 per metric ton. The pumper can pump 100 metric tons per 8-hour day. If leased, the asset will have a contract period of 5 years. Plan 2 is a rental option that will cost $19,000 per year. In addition, an extra $15.5 per hour labor cost will be incurred for operating the rented equipment per 8-hour day. Which plan should the engineer recommend if the equipment will be needed for 45 days per year? The MARR is 14% per year. The annual worth of plan 1 lease optimistic is $ . The annual worth of plan 1 most likely is $ . The annual worth of plan 1 pessimistic is $ . The annual worth of plan 2 rental is.arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?arrow_forwardAn engineer must decide between two ways to pump concrete to the top of a seven-story building. Plan 1 requires the leasing of equipment for $60,000 initially and will cost between $0.40 and $0.95 per metric ton to operate, with a most likely cost of $0.50 per metric ton. The pumper can pump 100 metric tons per 8-hour day. If leased, the asset will have a contract period of 5 years. Plan 2 is a rental option that will cost $17,000 per year. In addition, an extra $13.5 per hour labor cost will be incurred for operating the rented equipment per 8-hour day. Which plan should the engineer recommend if the equipment will be needed for 90 days per year? The MARR is 12% per year.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education