MYECONLAB+ETEXT+KNAPP 104 STUDENT PACKET
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781323477816
Author: HUBBARD/KNAPP
Publisher: PEARSON C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.3.5PA
To determine
How the Pigovian tax is paid by the consumers when the government has not imposed the Pigovian Tax.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
The City of Philadelphia is currently considering a 3 cent per ounce tax on sugary beverages. A member of the City Council happens to have majored in economics and suggests that the city also consider an equivalent lump-sum tax that generates the same revenue. (a) Which sort of tax would a consumer prefer, and why? Draw a graph comparing the two taxes to help illustrate your answer. (b) Which sort of tax would an economist prefer, and why? (c) Which sort of tax might a politician prefer, and why?
In 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year.
a. What is wrong with this answer?
In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high.
Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues.
The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately.
No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.
In the past, some counties and countries have imposed taxes on sugar, saturated fats, and food made with those ingredients as a way to reduce consumption of those foods. Assume the government imposes a unit tax on all chocolate. Answer the following questions:
Will consumers be able to shift this tax to sellers? If yes explain why/how. If no explain why not.
Based on your answer to c, who will bear the incidence of this tax?
Chapter 5 Solutions
MYECONLAB+ETEXT+KNAPP 104 STUDENT PACKET
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- How a tax burden is divided between consumers and producers is called tax incidence. Consumers bear most of the tax burden when:arrow_forwardDuring the Summer of 2022, gas prices rose well over $5.00 per gallon. In response, President Biden called for a 3-month Federal Gas Tax Holiday, which would remove the $0.18 per gallon federal tax on gasoline. Under what circumstances would you expect consumers to reap the majority of the benefits from the removal of the gasoline tax? Under what circumstances would you expect gasoline retailers to reap the majority of the benefits from the removal of the gasoline tax?arrow_forwardIncome tax is an example ofarrow_forward
- If tax incidence is not affected by whether the government makes buyers or sellers pay the tax then which factors determine the tax incidence?arrow_forwardSuppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola producers a tax. Before the tax, 15,000 cases of cola were sold every week at a price of $4 per case. After the tax, 9,000 cases of cola are sold every week; consumers pay $5 per case, and producers receive $1 per case (after paying the tax). The amount of tax on a case of cola is $___ per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $___ per case, and the burden that falls on producers is $___ per case.arrow_forwardSuppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine producers a tax. Before the tax, 20 million bottles of wine were sold every month at a price of $5 per bottle. After the tax, 13 million bottles of wine are sold every month; consumers pay $6 per bottle, and producers receive $3 per bottle (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is ____ per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is ____ per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is _____ per bottle. (Answer all) True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.arrow_forward
- Suppose the government imposes an excise tax on electric scooters. The black line on the following graph shows the tax wedge created by a tax of $160 per scooter. First, use the tan quadrilateral (dash symbols) to shade the area representing tax revenue. Next, use the green point (triangle symbol) to shade the area representing total consumer surplus after the tax. Then, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to shade the area representing total producer surplus after the tax. Finally, use the black point (plus symbol) to shade the area representing deadweight loss.arrow_forwardThe government is considering levying a tax of $120 per unit on suppliers of either leather jackets or smartphones. The supply curve for each of these two goods is identical, as you can see on each of the following graphs. The demand for leather jackets is shown by DLDL (on the first graph), and the demand for smartphones is shown by DSDS (on the second graph). Suppose the government taxes leather jackets. The following graph shows the annual supply and demand for this good. It also shows the supply curve (S+TaxS+Tax) shifted up by the amount of the proposed tax ($120 per jacket). On the following graph, use the green rectangle (triangle symbols) to shade the area that represents tax revenue for leather jackets. Then use the black triangle (plus symbols) to shade the area that represents the deadweight loss associated with the tax. Instead, suppose the government taxes smartphones. The following graph shows the annual supply and demand for this good, as well as the supply curve…arrow_forwardThe government is considering levying a tax of $80 per unit on suppliers of either leather jackets or smartphones. The supply curve for each of these two goods is identical, as you can see on each of the following graphs. The demand for leather jackets is shown by DLDL (on the first graph), and the demand for smartphones is shown by DSDS (on the second graph). Suppose the government taxes leather jackets. The following graph shows the annual supply and demand for this good. It also shows the supply curve (S+TaxS+Tax) shifted up by the amount of the proposed tax ($80 per jacket). On the following graph, use the green rectangle (triangle symbols) to shade the area that represents tax revenue for leather jackets. Then use the black triangle (plus symbols) to shade the area that represents the deadweight loss associated with the tax. Instead, suppose the government taxes smartphones. The following graph shows the annual supply and demand for this good, as well as the supply curve…arrow_forward
- You are an economist in the Internal Revenue System and just heard of a plan to increase the sales tax on a certain widget by $.06. Last year customers purchased about 10 million widgets. The demand curve in the last year was such that a $.01 increasein price decreases sales by 100,000. A study showed that a $.01 increase in price resulted in producers willing to provide 50,000 more widgets to the market. Congress stated that this$.06 tax will increase government revenues by $600,000 and raise the price of each widget by $.06. Is this correct? If so, explain why this is the case and, if not, what is the increase in prices and revenues?arrow_forwardWhat is the equilibrium P* and Q* before the imposition of the tax?arrow_forwardSuppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine consumers a tax. Before the tax, 15 million bottles of wine were sold every month at a price of $7 per bottle. After the tax, 9 million bottles of wine are sold every month; consumers pay $10 per bottle (including the tax), and producers receive $4 per bottle. The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $_______ per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $________per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $_______per bottle.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning