MYECONLAB+ETEXT+KNAPP 104 STUDENT PACKET
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781323477816
Author: HUBBARD/KNAPP
Publisher: PEARSON C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.4.11PA
To determine
Applying concept of free riding.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Using macroeconomics, briefly describe the main economic dilemma of an economy
Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the United States.
Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy?
Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient.
Society would not benefit from lower air pollution.
The environment isn’t worth protecting.
The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit.
Briefly discuss two justifications for government intervention in the economy.
Chapter 5 Solutions
MYECONLAB+ETEXT+KNAPP 104 STUDENT PACKET
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that Gilberto, an economist from a business school in Georgia, and Juanita, an economist from a university in Massachusetts, are arguing over government intervention. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: JUANITA: The usefulness of government intervention in the economy is a long-standing issue that economists continue to debate. GILBERTO: I feel that government involvement in the economy should be reduced because government programs cause more harm than good. JUANITA: While I agree that government programs can be inefficient, I really think they are necessary to help the less fortunate. The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to _____________ (options: differences in values, imperfect information). Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree? A. Rent controls will only add value to housing in a city. B. Free trade is usually preferable to the erection of tariffs and…arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are kids. Their parents want to get a pet to keep them busy during a pandemic but they must choose between a dog and cat. Bart's value of the cat is $10 and his value of the dog is $40. Lisa's value of the cat is $30 and her value of the dog is $20. a. What is the efficient pet? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] Let's imagine that their parents flip a coin to decide who gets to choose the pet. Heads Lisa chooses and tails Bart chooses. b. If the coin comes up heads and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Lisa choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] c. If the coin comes up tails and there are no barriers to negotiation, what will Bart choose? [ Select ] ["cat", "dog"] d. What if there ARE barriers to negotiation and the coin is heads, what will Lisa choose?…arrow_forwardExplain briefly why the people and firms operating within a command economy would in all cases be less free than the people and firms operating within a capitalist economy.arrow_forward
- If there are no externalities or market power and all markets are in equilibrium, what conclusions can we draw from this in economic theory?arrow_forwardAndy, Brad, and Carly are playing a new online video game: Zombie Civil War. Each has an army of 100 zombies and must decide how to allocate them to battle each of the other two players’ armies. Three simultaneous battles are occurring: one between Andy and Brad, one between Andy and Carly, and one between Brad and Carly. Let Ab denote how many zombie soldiers Andy allocates to his battle with Brad, with the remaining 100 - Ab soldiers in Andy’s zombie army assigned to the battle with Carly. Bc denotes the number of zombie soldiers that Brad allocates to his battle with Carly, and 100 - Bc zombies go to his battle with Andy. Ca is the the number of zombie soldiers that Carly allocates to the battle with Andy, and 100 - Ca in her battle with Brad. To see how payoffs are determined, consider Andy. If Ab > 100 - Bc, so that Andy has more zombies than Brad in the Andy-Brad battle, then Andy wins the battle and receives w points where w > 2. If Ab = 100 - Bc, so that Andy and Brad…arrow_forwardIn an article in the agriculture magazine Choices, Oregon State University economist JunJie Wu made the following observation about the conversion of farmland to urban development: Land use provides many economic and social benefits, but often comes at a substantial cost to the environment. Although most economic costs are figured into land use decisions, most environmental externalities are not. These environmental "externalities" cause a divergence between private and social costs for some land uses, leading to an inefficient land allocation. For example, developers may not bear all the environmental and infrastructural costs generated by their projects. Such "market failures" provide a justification for private conservation efforts and public land use planning and regulation. What does the author mean by market failures and inefficient land use allocation? Explain why the author describes inefficient land allocation as a market failure. Illustrate your argument with a…arrow_forward
- Briefly explain what is meant by the term "externality" and how it occurs. a. What are the two types of externalities? b.How does government fix both of these issues? c. Is government intervention necessary? Why or why not?arrow_forwardcome up with your own example of positive externality and then another example of negative externality. Briefly explain why they can be considered externalities.arrow_forwardBriefly discuss a government intervention in the market that you would considered as necessary, or an intervention that, is not worth the loss of efficiency (deadweight loss) in the economy.arrow_forward
- explain how taxes and subsidies can be used to internalize externality. Next, give an example of the case that taxes and subsidies can be used to internalize externalitiesarrow_forwardIn 1938, major powers met in Munich to discuss Germany’s demands to annex part of Czechoslovakia. Let us think of the issue as the proportion of Czechoslovak territory given to Germany. Possible outcomes can be plotted on a single dimension, where 0 implies that Germany obtains no territory and 1 implies that Germany obtains all of Czechoslovakia: Most countries at Munich (“Allies” for short) wish to give nothing to Germany: their ideal point is 0, which gives them utility of 1. Their worst possible outcome is for Germany to take all of Czechoslovakia; hence an outcome of 1 gives them utility of 0. In between these extremes, the Allies could propose a compromise, X, which gives them utility of 1 – X. The question for the Allies is whether to propose a compromise or fight a war with Germany, which they are sure will ensue if they offer nothing. If they propose a compromise and Germany accepts, they get a payoff of 1 – X. If they fight, they win with probability p and lose with…arrow_forwardIn 1938, major powers met in Munich to discuss Germany’s demands to annex part of Czechoslovakia. Let us think of the issue as the proportion of Czechoslovak territory given to Germany. Possible outcomes can be plotted on a single dimension, where 0 implies that Germany obtains no territory and 1 implies that Germany obtains all of Czechoslovakia: Most countries at Munich (“Allies” for short) wish to give nothing to Germany: their ideal point is 0, which gives them utility of 1. Their worst possible outcome is for Germany to take all of Czechoslovakia; hence an outcome of 1 gives them utility of 0. In between these extremes, the Allies could propose a compromise, X, which gives them utility of 1 – X. The question for the Allies is whether to propose a compromise or fight a war with Germany, which they are sure will ensue if they offer nothing. If they propose a compromise and Germany accepts, they get a payoff of 1 – X. If they fight, they win with probability p and lose with…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning