Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 30P
To determine
Calculate the incremental cash flow.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What is meant by the term equal service alternative?
A process can be completed using either Alternative X or Y, where Y is an automated version of X. Alternative X has fixed costs of $10,000 per year with a variable cost of $50 per unit. If the process is automated, the fixed cost for Y will be $5,000 per year and its variable cost will be only $30 per unit. The minimum number of units that must be produced each year for alternative Y to be favored is closest to:a. Alternative Y will be favored for any level of productionb. 125c. 375d. Alternative X will be favored for any level of production
Two methods can be used for producing solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $550,000, an AOC of $160,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $830,000 with an AOC of $120,000, and a $240,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a 3-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of method 2 will be 35% higher after 3 years than it is after 5 years. If the MARR is 10% per year, which method should the company select
Chapter 6 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1PCh. 6 - Prob. 2PCh. 6 - Prob. 3PCh. 6 - Prob. 4PCh. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Prob. 7PCh. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - A University of Massachusetts study found that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 6 - The Closing the Gaps initiative by the Texas...Ch. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - Prob. 13PCh. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Prob. 17PCh. 6 - Prob. 18PCh. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Prob. 20PCh. 6 - Prob. 21PCh. 6 - Prob. 22PCh. 6 - Prob. 23PCh. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Prob. 25PCh. 6 - A company that manufactures rigid shaft couplings...Ch. 6 - For each of the following scenarios, state whether...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Prob. 30PCh. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Prob. 34PCh. 6 - Prob. 35PCh. 6 - The four alternatives described below are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 37PCh. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - Ashley Foods, Inc. has determined that only one of...Ch. 6 - Five revenue projects are under consideration by...Ch. 6 - Four different machines are under consideration...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - Prob. 43PCh. 6 - Prob. 44PCh. 6 - Prob. 45PCh. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Prob. 54PCh. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60APQCh. 6 - Prob. 61APQCh. 6 - Prob. 62APQCh. 6 - Prob. 63APQCh. 6 - Prob. 64APQCh. 6 - Prob. 65APQCh. 6 - Prob. 66APQCh. 6 - Prob. 67APQCh. 6 - Prob. 68APQCh. 6 - Prob. 69APQCh. 6 - Prob. 70APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Two methods can be used to produce solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $800,000, an AOC of $150,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $910,000 with an AOC of $125,000 and a $230,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a three-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of Method 2 will be 40% higher after three years than it is after five years. If the MARR is 14% per year, which method should the company select? Which method should the company select?arrow_forwardEP Electric has identified two new methods to treat its cooling water. Alternative I (for inflow) would treat the raw water with a conventional reverse osmosis system so that the cycles of concentration could be increased from 5 to 20. This will result in water cost savings of $360,000 per year and chemical cost savings of $56,000 per year. The initial cost of the equipment will be $2.3 million with an operating cost of $125,000 per year. Alternative B (for blowdown) will treat the cooling tower blowdown water using a highpressure seawater reverse osmosis system to recover most of the water that is sent to an evaporation pond. This option will result in water savings of $270,000 per year. The cost of the system will be $1.2 million with an operating cost of $105,000 per year. Assuming one of the two methods must be installed, determine which is preferred on the basis of the incremental ROR value using MARR of 5% per year, which is a typically low return expected of government projects.…arrow_forwardTo make an item in-house, equipment costing $250,000 must be purchased. It will have a life of 4 years, annual operating cost of $80,000, and each unit will cost $40 to manufacture. Buying the item externally will cost $100 per unit. At i=15% per year, at what number of units needed per year will it be more economical to produce the item in-house? Using Breakeven Analysis, pls solve the problemarrow_forward
- A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an above ground electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $16,600 to install and will have a useful life of 5 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc., are expected to be $2400. A new power line will cost $31,000 to install, with power costs expected to be $1000 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 5 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 10% per year, (b) what must be the first cost of the above ground line to make the two alternatives equally attractive economically?arrow_forwardA window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forwardThe AW values of three cost alternatives are $−23,000 for alternative A, $−21,600 for B, and $−27,300 for C. On the basis of these results, the decision is to: (a) select alternative A (b) select alternative B (c) select alternative C (d) select the Do Nothing alternativearrow_forward
- Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. (Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return. The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.arrow_forwardA company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary-indexing spindles is considering an upgrade of production equipment to reduce costs over the next 5 years. The company can invest $80,000 now, 1 year from now, or 2 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. The saving estimates are $26,000, $31,000, or $37,000 per year if the investment is made now, 1 year from now, or 2 years from now, respectively. The company will only invest if the ROR is at least 20% per year. Using a future worth analysis, determine if the timing of the investment will affect the return requirement and, if so, when the investment should be made. Solve by (a) hand, and (b) spreadsheet.arrow_forward
- Two methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?arrow_forwardThe manager of a canned-food processing plant has two labeling machine options. On the basis of a rate of return analysis with a MARR of 20% per year, determine (a) which model is economically better, and (b) if the selection changes, provided both options have a 4-year life and all other estimates remain the same. Model 105 200 First cost, $ −15,000 −25,000 AOC, $ per year −1,600 −400 Salvage value, $ 3,000 4,000 Life, years 2 4arrow_forwardYou work for Bellevue Window Products. While performing an analysis for a new window product, you found a report from last year that provided the following information regarding the manufacture of a similar product: annual production rate = 40,000 units; selling price = $70 per unit; fixed production cost = $240,000 per year; variable production cost = $1,700,000 per year; variable selling expenses = $96,000 per year. As a first-cut, you decide to use this information to estimate (a) the breakeven production rate per year, (b) the company’s profit last year, and(c) the annual production rate that would generate a profit of $1,000,000 per year. What are your estimates? Draw the breakeven diagram and spreadsheet functions necessary to perform the analysisarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education