Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 59P
To determine
Calculate the RIOC rate.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Two roadway designs are under consideration for access to a permanent suspension bridge. Design 1A will cost $3 million to build and $100,000 per year to maintain. Design 1B will cost $3.5 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain. Both designs are assumed to be permanent. Use an AWbased rate of return equation to determine (a) the breakeven ROR, and (b) which design is preferred at a MARR of 10% per year.
A food processing company is considering two types of moisture analyzers. Only one can be selected. The company expects an infrared model to yield a rate of return of 27% per year. A more expensive microwave model will yield a rate of return of 19% per year. If the company’s MARR is 19% per year, can you determine which model should be purchased solely on the basis of the overall rate of return information provided? Why or why not?
Ten noneconomic attributes are identified as A, B, C, ..., J. If they are rank-ordered in terms of decreasing importance with a value of 10 assigned to A, 9 to B, etc., the weighting of attribute B is closest to: (a) 0.24 (b) 0.17 (c) 0.08 (d) 0.04
Chapter 6 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1PCh. 6 - Prob. 2PCh. 6 - Prob. 3PCh. 6 - Prob. 4PCh. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Prob. 7PCh. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - A University of Massachusetts study found that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 6 - The Closing the Gaps initiative by the Texas...Ch. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - Prob. 13PCh. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Prob. 17PCh. 6 - Prob. 18PCh. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Prob. 20PCh. 6 - Prob. 21PCh. 6 - Prob. 22PCh. 6 - Prob. 23PCh. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Prob. 25PCh. 6 - A company that manufactures rigid shaft couplings...Ch. 6 - For each of the following scenarios, state whether...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Prob. 30PCh. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Prob. 34PCh. 6 - Prob. 35PCh. 6 - The four alternatives described below are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 37PCh. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - Ashley Foods, Inc. has determined that only one of...Ch. 6 - Five revenue projects are under consideration by...Ch. 6 - Four different machines are under consideration...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - Prob. 43PCh. 6 - Prob. 44PCh. 6 - Prob. 45PCh. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Prob. 54PCh. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60APQCh. 6 - Prob. 61APQCh. 6 - Prob. 62APQCh. 6 - Prob. 63APQCh. 6 - Prob. 64APQCh. 6 - Prob. 65APQCh. 6 - Prob. 66APQCh. 6 - Prob. 67APQCh. 6 - Prob. 68APQCh. 6 - Prob. 69APQCh. 6 - Prob. 70APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. (Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return. The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.arrow_forwardA process can be completed using either Alternative X or Y, where Y is an automated version of X. Alternative X has fixed costs of $10,000 per year with a variable cost of $50 per unit. If the process is automated, the fixed cost for Y will be $5,000 per year and its variable cost will be only $30 per unit. The minimum number of units that must be produced each year for alternative Y to be favored is closest to:a. Alternative Y will be favored for any level of productionb. 125c. 375d. Alternative X will be favored for any level of productionarrow_forward
- Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.arrow_forwardA piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is 2,500,000, and the equipment will have a market value of 50,000 at the end of a study period of 15 years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to 500,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. If the firm’s Minimum Attractive Rate of Return is 22% per year, is this proposal a sound one? Use the Present Worth Method and Annual Worth Method.arrow_forwardUPS Freight plans to spend $100 million on new long-haul tractor-trailers. Some of these vehicles will include a new shelving design with adjustable shelves to transport irregularly sized freight that requires special handling during loading and unloading. Though the life is relatively short, the director wants a capitalized cost analysis performed on the two final designs. Compare the alternatives at the MARR of 10% per year using (a) tabulated factors, and (b) a spreadsheet.arrow_forward
- The rate of return for alternative X is 18% per year and for alternative Y is 17% per year, with Y requiring a larger initial investment. If a company has a minimum attractive rate of return of 16% per year, a)The company should select alternative X. b)The company should select alternative Y. c)The company should conduct an incremental analysis between X and Y to select the economically better alternative. d)The company should select the do-nothing alternative.arrow_forwardHarley worked for many years to save enough money to start his own residential landscape design business. The net cash flows shown are those he recorded for the first 6 years as his own boss. Find the external rate of return using the modified rate of return approach with a reinvestment rate of 15% per year and a borrowing rate of 8%. Additionally, after using the procedure, use the MIRR function to confirm your answer.arrow_forwardA window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forward
- Which is the most efficient analysis method we can use for determining project acceptability on an economic basis?arrow_forwardThe president of Biomed Products is considering a long-term contract to outsource maintenance and operations that will significantly improve the energy efficiency of their imaging systems. The payment schedule has two large payments in the first years with continuing payments thereafter. The proposed schedule is $200,000 now, $300,000 four years from now, $50,000 every 5 years, and an annual amount of $8000 beginning 15 years from now and continuing indefinitely. Determine the capitalized cost at 8% per year.arrow_forwardA manufacturer of electronic devices invests $650,000 in equipment for making compact piezoelectric accelerometers for general purpose vibration measurement. Estimate the rate of return from revenue of $225,000 per year for 10 years and $70,000 in salvage value from the used equipment sale in year 10. The company uses an MARR of 25%. Solve (a) Manually using interpolation, and (b) using Excel spreadsheet function.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education