Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 32P
To determine
Calculate the incremental
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Lego Group in Bellund, Denmark, manufactures Lego toy construction blocks. The company is considering two methods for producing special-purpose Lego parts. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $460,000, an annual operating cost of $100,000, and a life of 3 years. Method 2 will have an initial cost of $560,000, an operating cost of $90,000 per year, and a 6-year life. Assume 11% salvage values for both methods. Lego uses an MARR of 9% per year.
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
Two roadway designs are under consideration for access to a permanent suspension bridge. Design 1A will cost $3 million to build and $100,000 per year to maintain. Design 1B will cost $3.5 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain. Both designs are assumed to be permanent. Use an AWbased rate of return equation to determine (a) the breakeven ROR, and (b) which design is preferred at a MARR of 10% per year.
A land development company is considering the purchase of earth-moving equipment. The equipment will have a first cost of $190,000 and a salvagevalue of $70,000 when the company sells it in 10 years. A service contract for maintenance on the equipment will cost $40,000 per year. The operatingcost is expected to be $260 per day. Alternatively, the company can rent the necessary equipment for $1100 per day and hire a driver at $180 per day. If the company’s MARR is 10% per year, how many days per year must the company need the equipment in order to justify its purchase?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1PCh. 6 - Prob. 2PCh. 6 - Prob. 3PCh. 6 - Prob. 4PCh. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Prob. 7PCh. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - A University of Massachusetts study found that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 6 - The Closing the Gaps initiative by the Texas...Ch. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - Prob. 13PCh. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Prob. 17PCh. 6 - Prob. 18PCh. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Prob. 20PCh. 6 - Prob. 21PCh. 6 - Prob. 22PCh. 6 - Prob. 23PCh. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Prob. 25PCh. 6 - A company that manufactures rigid shaft couplings...Ch. 6 - For each of the following scenarios, state whether...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Prob. 30PCh. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Prob. 34PCh. 6 - Prob. 35PCh. 6 - The four alternatives described below are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 37PCh. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - Ashley Foods, Inc. has determined that only one of...Ch. 6 - Five revenue projects are under consideration by...Ch. 6 - Four different machines are under consideration...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - Prob. 43PCh. 6 - Prob. 44PCh. 6 - Prob. 45PCh. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Prob. 54PCh. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60APQCh. 6 - Prob. 61APQCh. 6 - Prob. 62APQCh. 6 - Prob. 63APQCh. 6 - Prob. 64APQCh. 6 - Prob. 65APQCh. 6 - Prob. 66APQCh. 6 - Prob. 67APQCh. 6 - Prob. 68APQCh. 6 - Prob. 69APQCh. 6 - Prob. 70APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- EP Electric has identified two new methods to treat its cooling water. Alternative I (for inflow) would treat the raw water with a conventional reverse osmosis system so that the cycles of concentration could be increased from 5 to 20. This will result in water cost savings of $360,000 per year and chemical cost savings of $56,000 per year. The initial cost of the equipment will be $2.3 million with an operating cost of $125,000 per year. Alternative B (for blowdown) will treat the cooling tower blowdown water using a highpressure seawater reverse osmosis system to recover most of the water that is sent to an evaporation pond. This option will result in water savings of $270,000 per year. The cost of the system will be $1.2 million with an operating cost of $105,000 per year. Assuming one of the two methods must be installed, determine which is preferred on the basis of the incremental ROR value using MARR of 5% per year, which is a typically low return expected of government projects.…arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. (Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return. The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.arrow_forwardThe president of Biomed Products is considering a long-term contract to outsource maintenance and operations that will significantly improve the energy efficiency of their imaging systems. The payment schedule has two large payments in the first years with continuing payments thereafter. The proposed schedule is $200,000 now, $300,000 four years from now, $50,000 every 5 years, and an annual amount of $8000 beginning 15 years from now and continuing indefinitely. Determine the capitalized cost at 8% per year.arrow_forward
- Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.arrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image formate thanku. Biomet Implants is planning new online patient diagnostics for surgeons while they operate. The new system will cost $300,000 to install in an operating room, $5000 annually for maintenance, and have an expected life of 10 years. The revenue per system is estimated to be $80,000 in year 1 and to increase by $10,000 per year through year 10. a) Determine NPV to see if the project is economically justified using PW analysis and an MARR of 10% per year. b) Insert a Triangle distribution with minimum at $8000, average 10,000 and maximum at 12000 as the input distribution for the revenue increase. Perform Monte Carlo Simulation and discuss the results.arrow_forwardWhat is the present worth difference between an investment of $30,000 per year for 40 years and aninvestment of $30,000 per year forever at an interest rate of 15% per year?arrow_forward
- What is meant by the term equal service alternative?arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?arrow_forwardA window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forward
- The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.arrow_forwardAn engineer has been offered an investment opportunity that will require a cash outlay of $40,000 now for a cash inflow of $3500 for each year of investment. However, she must state now the number of years she plans to retain the investment. Additionally, if the investment is retained for 6 years, a lump-sum amount of $36,000 will be returned to her; after 10 years, the lump-sum return is anticipated to be $49,000, and after 15 years, it is estimated to be $55,000. Money is currently worth 10% per year. (a) Is the decision sensitive to the retention period? If so, what investment period is best? (b) Write the format of the spreadsheet function that will display the correct PW values.arrow_forwardFiesta Foundry is considering a new furnace that will allow them to be more productive. Three alternative furnaces are under consideration. Perform an incremental analysis of these alternatives using the IRR method for each increment of cash flows. The MARR is 14% per year.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education