Chapter Three: Research Methodology 3.1 Introduction Having recognized the theoretical framework in relation to the research purpose, the following procedure is to identify, analyze and evaluate research techniques required for data collection. In order to meet the objectives set out by this study, one must ensure that the appropriate research methods have been adopted. This chapter critically analyses the available research methods; while providing justification for the approach used in this research. The research methodology of this study will be built around Saunders et al. (2007) framework; the ‘Onion Model’ (Figure 1), which shows highlights a number of philosophical approaches. Figure 1: Saunders’ onion model of research philosophy (Source: Saunders: et al. 2009). 3.2 Research Philosophy An interpretivist research philosophy has been adopted throughout this study, as the challenges of small business remain a subjective matter, which differ from one person to another. Interpretivism draws on the importance of understanding and interpreting the participants’ actions and social world from their point of view (Bryman & Bell, 2007). This study emphasis on understanding the challenges in small business in contrast to predicting the challenges which would otherwise require a positivist stance, hence a positivist philosophy was avoided. Positivists believe that research should be undertaken in a value-free way; by simply searching for facts in order to test hypothesis
This chapter outlines in detail how the research will be conducted, starting from the research philosophy, research design, data collection and analysis methods.
The third resource that I used is from the Office of Justice Programs/Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). A specific article titled “Intimate Partner Violence in the United States” shows a graph of intimate partner violence rates declining from 1993 to 2006. The article is quite vague, with no real description or stats stating whether or not men commit more violence against women than women do against men. “Violence between intimates is difficult to measure because it often occurs in private, and victims are often reluctant to report incidents to anyone because of shame or fear of reprisal” (S. Catalano).
This article analyzed the positive experiences of twelve individuals who had visible differences (Egan et al 2011, p. 739). This study discovered four main elements that helped people to interpret their related experiences in a positive way. Generally, it can be seen that the authors applied interpretive social science (Neuman 2006, p. 87) to produce this study to capture participants’ experiences and feelings. There are some advantages that can be yielded by utilizing this perspective. Firstly, the authors were able to understand individuals’ different social lives. The complex social factors can be extracted to interpret participants’ feelings and emotions from their personal experiences. It was
Share your approach to synthesizing the evidence. What were the variables of interest you identified?
Quantitative and Qualitative are said to be systematic in different design. Both design have to follow a process system that involved defining a principle of research.
Two techniques were used in collecting participants for the sample of the study. The first technique involved getting the approval of a Citrus Professor and administering surveys to students in their class after the lecture was completed. Before dispensing the surveys, students were instructed by the researchers to thoroughly, read over the consent form. In addition to this technique, researchers approach random students on campus and ask if they will be willing to take a short survey. The students then were briefly told about the purpose of the study, which was to see if there was a correlation between relationship satisfaction and academic performance, and then asked to read and give consent before participating.
Previous chapter describes the methodological approaches used to arrive at the aims and objectives of this study. This chapter is divided into seven parts. The first part explains the research philosophy used in this survey outlining the philosophical foundation that guided this research. The second part describes the research approach and the research strategy. The third part illustrates the instruments used in this study. The forth part describes the sampling strategy used in this section. The fifth part outlines the data collection approaches used in the research. The sixth part explains the approach used in conducting data analysis. The remaining parts explain the measures taken to ensure reliability of data collected and the ethical considerations that were taken during the study. As a whole, this chapter provides an overview into how the research was approached and executed.
It has been stated by Van Manen (1990) that the methodology is the framework of any research, It is suggested that the methodology is the theory behind the method and the methodology aids the researcher in deciding upon a research method.
Errors are identified to focus on the weaknesses and the strengths of each student in a small group to identify areas that need improvement. Cues are related to sound-to-letter expectations and are applied during oral reading to support struggling students know how to use letter-sound knowledge improves their reading abilities. Past studies according to Savage (2007) have indicated that systematic and direct phonics instructions are effective means used to assist children to learn how to read including children with learning and reading problemsStringer (2008) emphasises the importance of ethical considerations to protect the well-being and interests of research participants, particularly, confidentiality, permissions and informed consent when planning for action research as ’the deeper purpose of research is to extend people’s knowledge and understanding’ (p.3). Most organisations ensure the safety of participants through formal procedures. The researcher, as an early-childhood educator of this literature review would like to adopt both the quantitative and qualitative research methods as both the methods are vital to use the acquired knowledge about the topic and must be included and reflected effectively.
The scientific method is an organized way of figuring something out and normally includes six parts (Galgas, 2014). The first step is to state my purpose. For example, for this assignment, my purpose would be to examine the psychological factors affecting how teenagers in an impoverished urban area spend their time outside of school. Second is my research. For my assignment, I would find out as much information on the area as possible. For example, I would talk to teachers to see what kind of after school programs are available and I would talk to the community to find out what kind of community programs are
In doing the research, the methodology must be appropriate so that the analysis findings could reach the objective. Research methodology proposed one procedure in order way to be follow to answer all the questions in the research that want to be made. Quoted by Denzin and Lincoln (1994), methodology is a process that related with research objective and data. In the others word, it is early research planning that include the research scope, data collection method, data collection process and data analysis method. For Ranjit (2005), methodology is one of crucial part in research, in order to ensure the research can be done in the systematic way Overall, this chapter will discuss on the research frame and the methodologies used in order to meet the research objectives. Research process been divided into three main parts there are preliminary research part, data collection and last one data analysis.
Methodology utilised was mixed methods research design positivism and interpretivist. In recognizing a proper methodological approach towards a social research question, consideration was given towards the predominant and consistent assumptions about the nature of reality upon which researchers seek to build knowledge. This set of assumptions guide the research process: by the formulation of the research question and the methods for collecting and analysing data (Maykut & Morehouse, 1994, chapter 2).
Gathering information and conducting research is the starting point when a teacher wants to know a best teaching method or practice. Quantitative and qualitative research can be used for a teacher’s research. If quantitative research is used, three types of questions are available, and are of extreme importance. These types of questions include: descriptive, relational, and causal. It is up to the teacher doing the research to decide how to use them. While quantitative research depends on much numeric data and large sample populations, qualitative research depends on more personal interactions and smaller sample population (Schreiber, 2012). This essay will compare and contrast the three primary types of research questions most often used in quantitative research; as well as describe best practices or tips for composing strong qualitative research questions.
The study for this thesis will be exploratory research using secondary data collected by the communication agency, MESH Planning. The agency developed an innovative approach called ‘real-time experience tracking’, which involves three stages of data collection. And both qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and used in this context in order to get an insight of critical incidents.
Introduction in research is the most important section as it gives an overview of the research and the contents of the document to the readers. It should take users from their own lives to the place of the research analysis. Introduction part should give the essential information of why the research topic is important in the field. It should be concise though it does not have any word limits. In general introduction gives the review of the research. It is the best place to tell any assumptions that is there in the research if any. It should define the outline of the research and it should end with research questions which makes reader understand what exactly the research paper is going to achieve.