Accounting
27th Edition
ISBN: 9781337272094
Author: WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher: Cengage Learning,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 24, Problem 24.1CP
To determine
Transfer price: The price charged for the goods and services transferred among the divisions is referred to as transfer price.
Approaches for setting transfer prices:
- Market price approach
- Negotiated price approach
- Cost price approach
To discuss: The ethical behavior of D in setting transfer prices, and comments on H’s reaction
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Sembotix Company has several divisions including a Semiconductor Division that sells semiconductors to both internal and external customers. The company’s X-ray Division uses semiconductors as a component in its final product and is evaluating whether to purchase them from the Semiconductor Division or from an external supplier. The market price for semiconductors is $100 per 100 semiconductors. Dave Bryant is the controller of the X-ray Division, and Howard Hillman is the controller of the Semiconductor Division. The following conversation took place between Dave and Howard:
Dave: I hear you are having problems selling semiconductors out of your division. Maybe I can help.
Howard: You’ve got that right. We’re producing and selling at about 90% of our capacity to outsiders. Last year, we were selling 100% of capacity. Would it be possible for your division to pick up some of our excess capacity? After all, we are part of the same company.
Dave: What kind of price could you give…
Sembotix Company has several divisions including a Semiconductor Division that sells semiconductors to both internal and external customers. The company's X-ray Division uses semiconductors as a component in its final product and is evaluating whether to purchase them from the Semiconductor Division or from an external supplier. The market price for semiconductors is $100 per 100 semiconductors. Dave Bryant is the controller of the X-ray Division, and Howard Hillman is the controller of the Semiconductor Division. The following conversation took place between Dave and Howard:
Dave: I hear you are having problems selling semiconductors out of your division. Maybe I can help.
Howard: You've got that right. We're producing and selling at about 90% of our capacity to outsiders. Last year we were selling 100% of capacity. Would it be possible for your division to pick up some of the excess capacity? After all, we are part of the same company.
Dave: What kind of price can you give me?…
Code Incorporated has three divisions (Entertainment, Plastics, and Video Card), each of which is considered an investment center for performance evaluation purposes. The Entertainment Division manufactures video arcade equipment using products produced by the other two divisions, as follows:
1. The Entertainment Division purchases plastic components from the Plastics Division that are considered unique (i.e., they are made exclusively for the Entertainment Division). In addition, the Plastics Division makes less-complex plastic components that it sells externally, to other producers.
2. The Entertainment Division purchases, for each unit it produces, a video card from Code's Video Card Division, which also sells this video card externally (to other producers). The per-unit manufacturing costs associated with each of the above two items, as incurred by the Plastic Components Division and the Video Card Division, respectively, are:
Plastic Components
Video Cards
Direct…
Chapter 24 Solutions
Accounting
Ch. 24 - Differentiate between centralized and...Ch. 24 - Differentiate between a profit center and an...Ch. 24 - Prob. 3DQCh. 24 - What is the major shortcoming of using income from...Ch. 24 - In a decentralized company in which the divisions...Ch. 24 - How does using the return on investment facilitate...Ch. 24 - Why would a firm use a balanced scorecard in...Ch. 24 - What is the objective of transfer pricing?Ch. 24 - When is the negotiated price approach preferred...Ch. 24 - When using the negotiated price approach to...
Ch. 24 - Budgetary performance for cost center Caroline...Ch. 24 - Budgetary performance for cost center Conley...Ch. 24 - Service department charges The centralized...Ch. 24 - Service department charges The centralized...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.3APECh. 24 - Income from operations for profit center Using the...Ch. 24 - Profit margin, investment turnover, and ROI Cash...Ch. 24 - Profit margin, investment turnover and ROI Briggs...Ch. 24 - Residual income The Consumer Division of Galena...Ch. 24 - Residual income The Commercial Division of Herring...Ch. 24 - Transfer pricing The materials used by the North...Ch. 24 - Transfer pricing The materials used by the...Ch. 24 - Budget performance reports for cost centers...Ch. 24 - Divisional income statements The following data...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.3EXCh. 24 - Prob. 24.4EXCh. 24 - Service department charges In divisional income...Ch. 24 - Service department charges and activity bases...Ch. 24 - Divisional income statements with service...Ch. 24 - Corrections to service department charges for a...Ch. 24 - Profit center responsibility reporting Glades...Ch. 24 - Return on investment The income from operations...Ch. 24 - Residual income Based on the data in Exercise...Ch. 24 - Determining missing items in return computation...Ch. 24 - Profit margin, investment turnover, and return on...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.14EXCh. 24 - Determining missing items in return and residual...Ch. 24 - Determining missing items from computations Data...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.17EXCh. 24 - Balanced scorecard for a service company American...Ch. 24 - Building a balanced scorecard Hit-n-Kun Inc. owns...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.20EXCh. 24 - Prob. 24.21EXCh. 24 - Budget performance report for a cost center...Ch. 24 - Profit center responsibility reporting for a...Ch. 24 - Divisional income statements and return on...Ch. 24 - Effect of proposals on divisional performance A...Ch. 24 - Divisional performance analysis and evaluation The...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.6APRCh. 24 - Budget performance report for a cost center The...Ch. 24 - Profit center responsibility reporting for a...Ch. 24 - Divisional income statements and return on...Ch. 24 - Effect of proposals on divisional performance A...Ch. 24 - Divisional performance analysis and evaluation The...Ch. 24 - Prob. 24.6BPRCh. 24 - Prob. 24.1CPCh. 24 - Prob. 24.3CPCh. 24 - Prob. 24.4CPCh. 24 - Evaluating divisional performance The three...Ch. 24 - Evaluating division performance Last Resort...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Paterson Company, a U.S.-based company, manufactures and sells electronic components worldwide. Virtually all its manufacturing takes place in the United States. The company has marketing divisions throughout Europe, including France. Debbie Kishimoto, manager of this division, was hired from a competitor 3 years ago. Debbie, recently informed of a price increase in one of the major product lines, requested a meeting with Jeff Phillips, marketing vice president. Their conversation follows. Debbie: Jeff, I simply dont understand why the price of our main product has increased from 5.00 to 5.50 per unit. We negotiated an agreement earlier in the year with our manufacturing division in Philadelphia for a price of 5.00 for the entire year. I called the manager of that division. He said that the original price was still acceptablethat the increase was a directive from headquarters. Thats why I wanted to meet with you. I need some explanations. When I was hired, I was told that pricing decisions were made by the divisions. This directive interferes with this decentralized philosophy and will lower my divisions profits. Given current market conditions, there is no way we can pass on the cost increase. Profits for my division will drop at least 600,000 if this price is maintained. I think a midyear increase of this magnitude is unfair to my division. Jeff: Under normal operating conditions, headquarters would not interfere with divisional decisions. But as a company, we are having some problems. What you just told me is exactly why the price of your product has been increased. We want the profits of all our European marketing divisions to drop. Debbie: What do you mean that you want the profits to drop? That doesnt make any sense. Arent we in business to make money? Jeff: Debbie, what you lack is corporate perspective. We are in business to make money, and thats why we want European profits to decrease. Our U.S. divisions are not doing well this year. Projections show significant losses. At the same time, projections for European operations show good profitability. By increasing the cost of key products transferred to Europeto your division, for examplewe increase revenues and profits in the United States. By decreasing your profits, we avoid paying taxes in France. With losses on other U.S. operations to offset the corresponding increase in domestic profits, we avoid paying taxes in the United States as well. The net effect is a much-needed increase in our cash flow. Besides, you know how hard it is in some of these European countries to transfer out capital. This is a clean way of doing it. Debbie: Im not so sure that its clean. I cant imagine the tax laws permitting this type of scheme. There is another problem, too. You know that the companys bonus plans are tied to a divisions profits. This plan could cost all of the European managers a lot of money. Jeff: Debbie, you have no reason to worry about the effect on your bonusor on our evaluation of your performance. Corporate management has already taken steps to ensure no loss of compensation. The plan is to compute what income would have been if the old price had prevailed and base bonuses on that figure. Ill meet with the other divisional managers and explain the situation to them as well. Debbie: The bonus adjustment seems fair, although I wonder if the reasons for the drop in profits will be remembered in a couple of years when Im being considered for promotion. Anyway, I still have some strong ethical concerns about this. How does this scheme relate to the tax laws? Jeff: We will be in technical compliance with the tax laws. In the United States, Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code governs this type of transaction. The key to this law, as well as most European laws, is evidence of an arms-length price. Since youre a distributor, we can use the resale price method to determine such a price. Essentially, the arms-length price for the transferred good is backed into by starting with the price at which you sell the product and then adjusting that price for the markup and other legitimate differences, such as tariffs and transportation. Debbie: If I were a French tax auditor, I would wonder why the markup dropped from last year to this year. Are we being good citizens and meeting the fiscal responsibilities imposed on us by each country in which we operate? Jeff: Well, a French tax auditor might wonder about the drop in markup. But, the markup is still within reason, and we can make a good argument for increased costs. In fact, weve already instructed the managers of our manufacturing divisions to legitimately reassign as many costs as they can to the European product lines. So far, they have been very successful. I think our records will support the increase that you are receiving. You really do not need to be concerned with the tax authorities. Our tax department assures me that this has been carefully researchedits unlikely that a tax audit will create any difficulties. Itll all be legal and above board. Weve done this several times in the past with total success. Required: 1. Do you think that the tax-minimization scheme described to Debbie Kishimoto is in harmony with the ethical behavior that should be displayed by top corporate executives? Why or why not? What would you do if you were Debbie? 2. Apparently, the tax department of Paterson Company has been strongly involved in developing the tax-minimization scheme. Assume that the accountants responsible for the decision are CMAs and members of the IMA, subject to the IMA standards of ethical conduct. Review the IMA standards for ethical conduct in Chapter 1. Are any of these standards being violated by the accountants in Patersons tax department? If so, identify them. What should these tax accountants do if requested to develop a questionable taxminimization scheme?arrow_forwardPaul Golding and his wife, Nancy, established Crunchy Chips in 1938. Over the past 60 years, the company has established distribution channels in 11 western states, with production facilities in Utah, New Mexico, and Colorado. In 1980, Pauls son, Edward, took control of the business. By 2017, it was clear that the companys plants needed to gain better control over production costs to stay competitive. Edward hired a consultant to install a standard costing system. To help the consultant establish the necessary standards, Edward sent her the following memo: The manufacturing process for potato chips begins when the potatoes are placed into a large vat in which they are automatically washed. After washing, the potatoes flow directly to an automatic peeler. The peeled potatoes then pass by inspectors, who manually cut out deep eyes or other blemishes. After inspection, the potatoes are automatically sliced and dropped into the cooking oil. The frying process is closely monitored by an employee. After the chips are cooked, they pass under a salting device and then pass by more inspectors, who sort out the unacceptable finished chips (those that are discolored or too small). The chips then continue on the conveyor belt to a bagging machine that bags them in 1-pound bags. After bagging, the bags are placed in a box and shipped. The box holds 15 bags. The raw potato pieces (eyes and blemishes), peelings, and rejected finished chips are sold to animal feed producers for 0.16 per pound. The company uses this revenue to reduce the cost of potatoes. We would like this reflected in the price standard relating to potatoes. Crunchy Chips purchases high-quality potatoes at a cost of 0.245 per pound. Each potato averages 4.25 ounces. Under efficient operating conditions, it takes four potatoes to produce one 16-ounce bag of plain chips. Although we label bags as containing 16 ounces, we actually place 16.3 ounces in each bag. We plan to continue this policy to ensure customer satisfaction. In addition to potatoes, other raw materials are the cooking oil, salt, bags, and boxes. Cooking oil costs 0.04 per ounce, and we use 3.3 ounces of oil per bag of chips. The cost of salt is so small that we add it to overhead. Bags cost 0.11 each and boxes 0.52 each. Our plant produces 8.8 million bags of chips per year. A recent engineering study revealed that we would need the following direct labor hours to produce this quantity if our plant operates at peak efficiency: Im not sure that we can achieve the level of efficiency advocated by the study. In my opinion, the plant is operating efficiently for the level of output indicated if the hours allowed are about 10% higher. The hourly labor rates agreed upon with the union are: Overhead is applied on the basis of direct labor dollars. We have found that variable overhead averages about 116% of our direct labor cost. Our fixed overhead is budgeted at 1,135,216 for the coming year. Required: 1. Discuss the benefits of a standard costing system for Crunchy Chips. 2. Discuss the presidents concern about using the result of the engineering study to set the labor standards. What standard would you recommend? 3. Form a group with two or three other students. Develop a standard cost sheet for Crunchy Chips plain potato chips. Round all computations to four decimal places. 4. Suppose that the level of production was 8.8 million bags of potato chips for the year as planned. If 9.5 million pounds of potatoes were used, compute the materials usage variance for potatoes.arrow_forwardGrate Care Company specializes in producing products for personal grooming. The company operates six divisions, including the Hair Products Division. Each division is treated as an investment center. Managers are evaluated and rewarded on the basis of ROI performance. Only those managers who produce the best ROIs are selected to receive bonuses and to fill higher-level managerial positions. Fred Olsen, manager of the Hair Products Division, has always been one of the top performers. For the past two years, Freds division has produced the largest ROI; last year, the division earned an operating income of 2.56 million and employed average operating assets valued at 16 million. Fred is pleased with his divisions performance and has been told that if the division does well this year, he will be in line for a headquarters position. For the coming year, Freds division has been promised new capital totaling 1.5 million. Any of the capital not invested by the division will be invested to earn the companys required rate of return (9 percent). After some careful investigation, the marketing and engineering staff recommended that the division invest in equipment that could be used to produce a crimping and waving iron, a product currently not produced by the division. The cost of the equipment was estimated at 1.2 million. The divisions marketing manager estimated operating earnings from the new line to be 156,000 per year. After receiving the proposal and reviewing the potential effects, Fred turned it down. He then wrote a memo to corporate headquarters, indicating that his division would not be able to employ the capital in any new projects within the next eight to 10 months. He did note, however, that he was confident that his marketing and engineering staff would have a project ready by the end of the year. At that time, he would like to have access to the capital. Required: 1. Explain why Fred Olsen turned down the proposal to add the capability of producing a crimping and waving iron. Provide computations to support your reasoning. 2. Compute the effect that the new product line would have on the profitability of the firm as a whole. Should the division have produced the crimping and waving iron? 3. Suppose that the firm used residual income as a measure of divisional performance. Do you think Freds decision might have been different? Why? 4. Explain why a firm like Grate Care might decide to use both residual income and return on investment as measures of performance. 5. Did Fred display ethical behavior when he turned down the investment? In discussing this issue, consider why he refused to allow the investment.arrow_forward
- Hasbro is a leading firm in the toy, game, and amusement industry. Its promoted brands group includes products from Playskool, Tonka, Milton Bradley, Parker Brothers, Tiger, and Wizards of the Coast. Sales of toys and games are highly variable from year to year depending on whether the latest products meet consumer interests. Hasbro also faces increasing competition from electronic and online games. Hasbro develops and promotes its core brands and manufactures and distributes products created by others under license arrangements. Hasbro pays a royalty to the creator of such products. In recent years, Hasbro has attempted to reduce its reliance on license arrangements, placing more emphasis on its core brands. Hasbro also has embarked on a strategy of reducing fixed selling and administrative costs in an effort to offset the negative effects on earnings of highly variable sales. Exhibit 4.30 presents the balance sheets for Hasbro for the years ended December 31, Years 1 through 4. Exhibit 4.31 presents the income statements and Exhibit 4.32 presents the statements of cash flows for Years 2 through 4. Exhibit 4.30 Exhibit 4.31 Exhibit 4.32 REQUIRED a. Exhibit 4.33 presents profitability ratios for Hasbro for Year 2 and Year 3. Calculate each of these financial ratios for Year 4. The income tax rate is 35%. b. Analyze the changes in ROA and its components for Hasbro over the three-year period, suggesting reasons for the changes observed. c. Analyze the changes in ROCE and its components for Hasbro over the three-year period, suggesting reasons for the changes observed. Exhibit 4.33arrow_forwardPosavek is a wholesale supplier of building supplies building contractors, hardware stores, and home-improvement centers in the Boston metropolitan area. Over the years, Posavek has expanded its operations to serve customers across the nation and now employs over 200 people as technical representatives, buyers, warehouse workers, and sales and office staff. Most recently, Posavek has experienced fierce competition from the large online discount stores. In addition, the company is suffering from operational inefficiencies related to its archaic information system. Posavek revenue cycle procedures are described in the following paragraphs. Revenue Cycle Posaveks sales department representatives receive orders via traditional mail, e-mail, telephone, and the occasional walk-in customer. Because Posavek is a wholesaler, the vast majority of its business is conducted on a credit basis. The process begins in the sales department, where the sales clerk enters the customers order into the centralized computer sales order system. The computer and file server are housed in Posaveks small data processing department. If the customer has done business with Posavek in the past, his or her data are already on file. If the customer is a first-time buyer, however, the clerk creates a new record in the customer account file. The system then creates a record of the transaction in the open sales order file. When the order is entered, an electronic copy of it is sent to the customers e-mail address as confirmation. A clerk in the warehouse department periodically reviews the open sales order file from a terminal and prints two copies of a stock release document for each new sale, which he uses to pick the items sold from the shelves. The warehouse clerk sends one copy of the stock release to the sales department and the second copy, along with the goods, to the shipping department. The warehouse clerk then updates the inventory subsidiary file to reflect the items and quantities shipped. Upon receipt of the stock release document, the sales clerk accesses the open sales order file from a terminal, closes the sales order, and files the stock release document in the sales department. The sales order system automatically posts these transactions to the sales, inventory control, and cost-of-goods-sold accounts in the general ledger file. Upon receipt of the goods and the stock release, the shipping department clerk prepares the goods for shipment to the customer. The clerk prepares three copies of the bill of lading. Two of these go with the goods to the carrier and the third, along with the stock release document, is filed in the shipping department. The billing department clerk reviews the closed sales orders from a terminal and prepares two copies of the sales invoice. One copy is mailed to the customer, and the other is filed in the billing department. The clerk then creates a new record in the accounts receivable subsidiary file. The sales order system automatically updates the accounts receivable control account in the general ledger file. CASH RECEIPTS PROCEDURES Mail room clerks open customer cash receipts, reviews the check and remittance advices for completeness, and prepares two copies of a remittance list. One copy is sent with the checks to the cash receipts department. The second copy of the remittance advices are sent to the billing department. When the cash receipts clerk receives the checks and remittance list, he verifies the checks received against those on the remittance list and signs the checks For Deposit Only. Once the checks are endorsed, he records the receipts in the cash receipts journal from his terminal. The clerk then fills out a deposit slip and deposits the checks in the bank. Upon receipt of the remittances, the billing department clerk records the amounts in the accounts receivable subsidiary ledger from the department terminal. The system automatically updates the AR control account in the general ledger Posavek has hired your public accounting firm to review its sales order procedures for internal control compliance and to make recommendations for changes. Required a. Create a data flow diagram of the current system. b. Create a system flowchart of the existing system. c. Analyze the physical internal control weaknesses in the system. d. (Optional) Prepare a system flowchart of a redesigned computer-based system that resolves the control weaknesses that you identified. Explain your solution.arrow_forwardLansing Electronics Inc. manufactures a variety of printers, scanners, and fax machines in itstwo divisions: the PSF Division and the Components Division. The Components Division produces electronic components that can be used by the PSF Division. All the components thisdivision produces can be sold to outside customers. However, from the beginning, nearly allof its output has been used internally. The current policy requires that all internal transfers ofcomponents be transferred at full cost.Recently, Cam DeVonn, the chief executive officer of Lansing Electronics, decided to investigate the transfer pricing policy. He was concerned that the current method of pricing internaltransfers might force decisions by divisional managers that would be suboptimal for the firm. Aspart of his inquiry, he gathered some information concerning Component Y34, which is usedby the PSF Division in its production of a basic scanner, Model SC67.The PSF Division sells 40,000 units of Model SC67 each year…arrow_forward
- Phoenix Inc., a cellular communication company, has multiple business units, organized as divisions. Each division’s management is compensated based on the division’s operating income. Division A currently purchases cellular equipment from outside markets and uses it to produce communication systems. Division B produces similar cellular equipment that it sells to outside customers—but not to division A at this time. Division A’s manager approaches division B’s manager with a proposal to buy the equipment from division B. If it produces the cellular equipment that division A desires, division B will incur variable manufacturing costs of $60 per unit. Relevant Information about Division B Sells 90,000 units of equipment to outside customers at $130 per unit Operating capacity is currently 80%; the division can operate at 100% Variable manufacturing costs are $70 per unit Variable marketing costs are $8 per unit Fixed manufacturing costs are $900,000 Income per Unit for Division A…arrow_forwardT-Comm makes a variety of products. It is organized in two divisions, North and South. The managers for each division are paid, in part, based on the financial performance of their divisions. The South Division normally sells to outside customers but, on occasion, also sells to the North Division. When it does, corporate policy states that the price must be cost plus 15 percent to ensure a “fair” return to the selling division. South received an order from North for 600 units. South’s planned output for the year had been 2,400 units before North’s order. South’s capacity is 3,000 units per year. The costs for producing those 2,400 units follow. Total Per Unit Materials $ 480,000 $ 200 Direct labor 230,400 96 Other costs varying with output 153,600 64 Fixed costs (do not vary with output) 2,016,000 840 Total costs $ 2,880,000 $ 1,200 Required: a. If you are the manager of the South Division, what unit cost would you ask…arrow_forwardT-Comm makes a variety of products. It is organized in two divisions, North and South. The managers for each division are paid, in part, based on the financial performance of their divisions. The South Division normally sells to outside customers but, on occasion, also sells to the North Division. When it does, corporate policy states that the price must be cost plus 15 percent to ensure a “fair” return to the selling division. South received an order from North for 600 units. South’s planned output for the year had been 2,400 units before North’s order. South’s capacity is 3,000 units per year. The costs for producing those 2,400 units follow.arrow_forward
- Cranshaw Business Services (CBS) operates an information technology (IT) consulting firm out of two offices: Detroit and Los Angeles. Corporate services, such as legal, finance, and personnel, are centralized at the main office and the costs of these services are allocated to the two offices for the purposes of profitability assessment. The Detroit office is the original unit of the company and is well established, having long-time clients from the automotive and other manufacturing industries. The Los Angeles office is new with a smaller, much more varied, clientele. The costs of personnel services at CBS are currently allocated on the basis of the number of employees in each office. The annual costs of the personnel department total $350,000. Data for the fiscal year just ended show the following: Detroit Los Angeles Number of employees 380 120 Number of new hires 7 20 Number of employees departing 3 10 Exercise 9-31 (Static) Unitwide versus Department…arrow_forwardABC Enterprises is a multi-divisional firm that makes and sells personal protective equipment to health-care providers and other businesses. Division A manufactures large, state-of-the-art HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air) filters that trap harmful particles. Division A sells HEPA filters to external buyers at the price of $73 per unit. Division A also provides these HEPA filters to Division B; Division B installs these filters in medical-grade Air Purifier Units and sells these Air Purifier Units to external buyers at the price of $906 per unit. Divisions A and B use normal absorption costing, with overhead (all fixed) allocated to units using a sophisticated activity-based costing system. Inventoriable unit costs for the two divisions are: Division A’s HEPA Filters: absorption cost per unit for external sales of $44 (includes $7 fixed overhead allocation); absorption cost per unit for internal transfers of $33 (includes $7.80 fixed overhead allocation). Division B’s Air Purifier…arrow_forwardTAC Industries, Inc. sells heavy equipment to large corporations and federal, state, and local governments. Corporate sales are the result of a competitive bidding process, where TAC competes against other companies based on selling price. Sales to the government are determined on a cost plus basis, where the selling price is determined by adding a fixed markup percentage to the total job cost. Tandy Lane is the cost accountant for the Equipment Division of TAC Industries Inc. The division is under pressure from senior management to improve operating income. As Tandy reviewed the division's job cost sheets, she realized that she could increase the division's operating income by moving a portion of direct labor hours that had been assigned to the job cost sheets of corporate customers onto the job order cost sheets of government customers. She believed that this would create a "win-win" for the division by (1) reducing the cost of corporate jobs, and (2) increasing the cost of…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337902663
Author:WARREN, Carl S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...
Finance
ISBN:9781285190907
Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub