Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 16P
a:
To determine
Calculate the present worth.
b:
To determine
Calculate the present worth through calculator.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
EP Electric has identified two new methods to treat its cooling water. Alternative I (for inflow) would treat the raw water with a conventional reverse osmosis system so that the cycles of concentration could be increased from 5 to 20. This will result in water cost savings of $360,000 per year and chemical cost savings of $56,000 per year. The initial cost of the equipment will be $2.3 million with an operating cost of $125,000 per year. Alternative B (for blowdown) will treat the cooling tower blowdown water using a highpressure seawater reverse osmosis system to recover most of the water that is sent to an evaporation pond. This option will result in water savings of $270,000 per year. The cost of the system will be $1.2 million with an operating cost of $105,000 per year. Assuming one of the two methods must be installed, determine which is preferred on the basis of the incremental ROR value using MARR of 5% per year, which is a typically low return expected of government projects.…
A process can be completed using either Alternative X or Y, where Y is an automated version of X. Alternative X has fixed costs of $10,000 per year with a variable cost of $50 per unit. If the process is automated, the fixed cost for Y will be $5,000 per year and its variable cost will be only $30 per unit. The minimum number of units that must be produced each year for alternative Y to be favored is closest to:a. Alternative Y will be favored for any level of productionb. 125c. 375d. Alternative X will be favored for any level of production
Two methods can be used for producing solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $550,000, an AOC of $160,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $830,000 with an AOC of $120,000, and a $240,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a 3-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of method 2 will be 35% higher after 3 years than it is after 5 years. If the MARR is 10% per year, which method should the company select
Chapter 4 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 4 - State two conditions under which the do-nothing...Ch. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - The costs associated with manufacturing a...
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 12PCh. 4 - Prob. 13PCh. 4 - Prob. 14PCh. 4 - Prob. 15PCh. 4 - Prob. 16PCh. 4 - Prob. 17PCh. 4 - Prob. 18PCh. 4 - Prob. 19PCh. 4 - Prob. 20PCh. 4 - Prob. 21PCh. 4 - Prob. 22PCh. 4 - Prob. 23PCh. 4 - Prob. 24PCh. 4 - Prob. 25PCh. 4 - Prob. 26PCh. 4 - Prob. 27PCh. 4 - Prob. 28PCh. 4 - Prob. 29PCh. 4 - Prob. 30PCh. 4 - Prob. 31PCh. 4 - Two mutually exclusive projects have the estimated...Ch. 4 - Prob. 33PCh. 4 - Prob. 34PCh. 4 - Prob. 35PCh. 4 - Prob. 36PCh. 4 - Prob. 37PCh. 4 - The manager of engineering at the 900-megawatt...Ch. 4 - Prob. 39PCh. 4 - Prob. 40PCh. 4 - Prob. 41PCh. 4 - Three different plans were presented to the GAO by...Ch. 4 - The U.S. Army received two proposals for a turnkey...Ch. 4 - Prob. 44PCh. 4 - Prob. 45PCh. 4 - Prob. 46PCh. 4 - Prob. 47PCh. 4 - Prob. 48PCh. 4 - Prob. 49PCh. 4 - Prob. 50PCh. 4 - Prob. 51PCh. 4 - Prob. 52PCh. 4 - Prob. 53PCh. 4 - Prob. 54PCh. 4 - Prob. 55PCh. 4 - Prob. 56PCh. 4 - Prob. 57PCh. 4 - Prob. 58PCh. 4 - Prob. 59PCh. 4 - Prob. 60PCh. 4 - Prob. 61PCh. 4 - Prob. 62PCh. 4 - Prob. 63APQCh. 4 - Prob. 64APQCh. 4 - Prob. 65APQCh. 4 - Prob. 66APQCh. 4 - Prob. 67APQCh. 4 - Prob. 68APQCh. 4 - Prob. 69APQCh. 4 - Prob. 70APQCh. 4 - Prob. 71APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Two processes can be used for producing a polymer that reduces friction loss in engines . Process T will have a first cost of $ 750,000 , an operating cost of $ 60,000 per year , and a salvage value of $ 80,000 after its 2 - year life . Process W will have a first cost of $ 1,350,000 , an operating cost of $ 25,000 per year , and a $ 120,000 salvage value after its 4 - year life . Process W will also require updating at the end of year 2 at a cost of $ 90,000 . Which process should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis at an interest rate of 12 % per year ?arrow_forwardLeroy purchased an AI-based robotics system with the first cost of $345,000, an AOC of $148,000 per year, a $140,000 salvage value, and an ESL of 3 years. Rather than trading after 3 years, he kept the system for a total of 5 years. Due to the wear factor and expense of repairs, its AOC increased to $240,000 per year starting in year 4, plus the salvage value went to zero. At i= 10% per year, what is the percentage increase in the AW of costs that Leroy experienced? The percentage increase in the AW of costs that Leroy experienced is %.arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used to produce solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $800,000, an AOC of $150,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $910,000 with an AOC of $125,000 and a $230,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a three-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of Method 2 will be 40% higher after three years than it is after five years. If the MARR is 14% per year, which method should the company select? Which method should the company select?arrow_forward
- Two processes can be used for producing a polymer that reduces friction loss in engines.Process T will have a first cost of $750,000, an operating cost of $60,000 per year, and asalvage value of $80,000 after its 2-year life. Process W will have a first cost of $1,350,000,an operating cost of $25,000 per year, and a $120,000 salvage value after its 4-year life.Process W will also require updating at the end of year 2 at a cost of $90,000. Whichprocess should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis at an interest rate of12% per year? *please answer in a neat and clear way.arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?arrow_forwardTwo membrane systems are under consideration for treating cooling tower blowdown to reduce its volume. A low-pressure seawater reverse osmosis(SWRO) system will operate at 500 psi and produce 720,000 gallons of permeate per day. It will have a fixed cost of $465 per day and an operatingcost of $485 per day. A higher pressure SWRO system operating at 800 psi will produce 950,000 gallons per day at an operating cost of $1280 perday. The fixed cost of the high pressure SWRO system will be only $328 per day because fewer membranes will be required. How many gallons of blowdown water must require treatment each day for the two systems to break even?arrow_forward
- Lego Group in Bellund, Denmark, manufactures Lego toy construction blocks. The company is considering two methods for producing special-purpose Lego parts. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $460,000, an annual operating cost of $100,000, and a life of 3 years. Method 2 will have an initial cost of $560,000, an operating cost of $90,000 per year, and a 6-year life. Assume 11% salvage values for both methods. Lego uses an MARR of 9% per year. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardThe production manager on the Ofon Phase 2 offshore platform operated by Total S.A. must purchase specialized environmental equipment or an equivalent service. The first cost is $250,000 with an AOC of $76,000. The manager has let it be known that he does not care about the salvage value because he thinks it will make no difference in the decision-making process. His supervisor estimates the salvage might be as high as $100,000 or as low as $10,000 in 3 years, at which time the equipment will be unnecessary. Alternatively, a subcontractor can provide the service for $215,000 per year. The total offshore project MARR is 13% per year. Determine if the decision to buy the equipment is sensitive to the salvage value. The annual worth of high salvage value is $ . The annual worth of low salvage value is $ . Decision is _____ to salvage value. (Sensitive/ Not Sensitive)arrow_forwardAn engineer must decide between two ways to pump concrete to the top of a seven-story building. Plan 1 requires the leasing of equipment for $60,000 initially and will cost between $0.40 and $0.95 per metric ton to operate, with a most likely cost of $0.50 per metric ton. The pumper can pump 100 metric tons per 8-hour day. If leased, the asset will have a contract period of 5 years. Plan 2 is a rental option that will cost $19,000 per year. In addition, an extra $15.5 per hour labor cost will be incurred for operating the rented equipment per 8-hour day. Which plan should the engineer recommend if the equipment will be needed for 45 days per year? The MARR is 14% per year. The annual worth of plan 1 lease optimistic is $ . The annual worth of plan 1 most likely is $ . The annual worth of plan 1 pessimistic is $ . The annual worth of plan 2 rental is.arrow_forward
- An engineer must decide between two ways to pump concrete to the top of a seven-story building. Plan 1 requires the leasing of equipment for $60,000 initially and will cost between $0.40 and $0.95 per metric ton to operate, with a most likely cost of $0.50 per metric ton. The pumper can pump 100 metric tons per 8-hour day. If leased, the asset will have a contract period of 5 years. Plan 2 is a rental option that will cost $17,000 per year. In addition, an extra $13.5 per hour labor cost will be incurred for operating the rented equipment per 8-hour day. Which plan should the engineer recommend if the equipment will be needed for 90 days per year? The MARR is 12% per year.arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. (Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return. The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education