Basics Of Engineering Economy
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780073376356
Author: Leland Blank, Anthony Tarquin
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 36P
a:
To determine
Select the project.
b:
To determine
New selection of the project.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.
Two methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?
An irrigation return flow drain has sampling equipment that can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $14,000 to install with a useful life of 10 years. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1500. A new power line will cost $12,000 to install and the power costs are estimated at $600 per year. The salvage value of the solar cells is expected to be 25% of the first cost when the sampling project ends in 4 years. The electric line will stay in place, so its salvage value is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 10% per year, which alternative should be selected?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Ch. 4 - State two conditions under which the do-nothing...Ch. 4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4 - Prob. 7PCh. 4 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 9PCh. 4 - The costs associated with manufacturing a...
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11PCh. 4 - Prob. 12PCh. 4 - Prob. 13PCh. 4 - Prob. 14PCh. 4 - Prob. 15PCh. 4 - Prob. 16PCh. 4 - Prob. 17PCh. 4 - Prob. 18PCh. 4 - Prob. 19PCh. 4 - Prob. 20PCh. 4 - Prob. 21PCh. 4 - Prob. 22PCh. 4 - Prob. 23PCh. 4 - Prob. 24PCh. 4 - Prob. 25PCh. 4 - Prob. 26PCh. 4 - Prob. 27PCh. 4 - Prob. 28PCh. 4 - Prob. 29PCh. 4 - Prob. 30PCh. 4 - Prob. 31PCh. 4 - Two mutually exclusive projects have the estimated...Ch. 4 - Prob. 33PCh. 4 - Prob. 34PCh. 4 - Prob. 35PCh. 4 - Prob. 36PCh. 4 - Prob. 37PCh. 4 - The manager of engineering at the 900-megawatt...Ch. 4 - Prob. 39PCh. 4 - Prob. 40PCh. 4 - Prob. 41PCh. 4 - Three different plans were presented to the GAO by...Ch. 4 - The U.S. Army received two proposals for a turnkey...Ch. 4 - Prob. 44PCh. 4 - Prob. 45PCh. 4 - Prob. 46PCh. 4 - Prob. 47PCh. 4 - Prob. 48PCh. 4 - Prob. 49PCh. 4 - Prob. 50PCh. 4 - Prob. 51PCh. 4 - Prob. 52PCh. 4 - Prob. 53PCh. 4 - Prob. 54PCh. 4 - Prob. 55PCh. 4 - Prob. 56PCh. 4 - Prob. 57PCh. 4 - Prob. 58PCh. 4 - Prob. 59PCh. 4 - Prob. 60PCh. 4 - Prob. 61PCh. 4 - Prob. 62PCh. 4 - Prob. 63APQCh. 4 - Prob. 64APQCh. 4 - Prob. 65APQCh. 4 - Prob. 66APQCh. 4 - Prob. 67APQCh. 4 - Prob. 68APQCh. 4 - Prob. 69APQCh. 4 - Prob. 70APQCh. 4 - Prob. 71APQ
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- A member of congress wants to know the capitalized cost of maintaining a proposal national park. The annual maintenance cost is expected to be P 2 250 000. At an interest rate of 6% per year, the capitalized cost of the maintenance would be closest to:arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $550,000, an AOC of $160,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $830,000 with an AOC of $120,000, and a $240,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a 3-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of method 2 will be 35% higher after 3 years than it is after 5 years. If the MARR is 10% per year, which method should the company selectarrow_forwardThe manager of a canned-food processing plant has two labeling machine options. On the basis of a rate of return analysis with a MARR of 20% per year, determine (a) which model is economically better, and (b) if the selection changes, provided both options have a 4-year life and all other estimates remain the same. Model 105 200 First cost, $ −15,000 −25,000 AOC, $ per year −1,600 −400 Salvage value, $ 3,000 4,000 Life, years 2 4arrow_forward
- Fairmont Industries primarily relies on 100% equity financing to fund projects. A goodopportunity is available that will require $250,000 in capital. The Fairmont owner can supply themoney from personal investments that currently earn an average of 8.5% per year. The annualnet cash flow from the project is estimated at $30,000 for the next 15 years. Alternatively, 60%of the required amount can be borrowed for 15 years at 9% per year. If the MARR is the WACC,determine which plan, if either is better. This is a before-tax analysisarrow_forwardTwo methods can be used to produce solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $800,000, an AOC of $150,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $910,000 with an AOC of $125,000 and a $230,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a three-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of Method 2 will be 40% higher after three years than it is after five years. If the MARR is 14% per year, which method should the company select? Which method should the company select?arrow_forwardEquipment needed at Valero Corporation refinery for the conversion of corn stock toethanol, a cleaner burning gasoline additive, will cost $175,000 and have net cashflows of $35,000 the first year, increasing by $10,000 per year over the life of 5 years.Develop a spreadsheet chart that plots AW vs interest rate to show where (what interestrate) the project switches from financially justified to unjustified. Use AW as the verticalaxis of the chart, and interest (i) as the horizontal axis of the chart. Use a range ofinterest rates spanning from 10% to 20%, and use increments of 1%. Label both axesand use a title for the chart.arrow_forward
- A dam will have a first cost of $5,000,000, an annual maintenance cost of $25,000 and minor reconstruction costs of $100,000 every five years. At an interest rate of 8% per year, the capitalized cost of the dam is nearest to:arrow_forwardABC Beverage, LLC, purchases its 355-ml cans in large bulk from Wald-China Can Corporation. The finish on the anodized aluminum surface is produced by mechanical finishing technologies called brushing or bead blasting. Engineers at Wald are switching to more efficient, faster, and cheaper machines to supply ABC. Use the estimates and MARR = 8% per year to select between the two alternatives. Brush Alternative Bead Blasting Alternative P $-400,000 $-400,000 n 6 years large Salvage Value $50,000 no value AOC Nonlabor $-60,000 in year 1, decreasing by $2500 annually starting in year 2 $-70,000 per yeararrow_forwardA window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forward
- The State of Chiapas, Mexico, decided to fund a program for literacy. The first cost of $300,000 now and an updated budget of $145,000 every 7 years forever is requested. Determine the perpetual equivalent annual cost at an interest rate of 10% per year. The perpetual equivalent annual cost is $− .arrow_forwardThe U.S. Army received two proposals for a turnkey design/build project for barracks for infantry unit soldiers in training. Proposal A involves an off-the-shelf “bare-bones” design and standard grade construction of walls, windows, doors, and other features. With this option, heating and cooling costs will be greater, maintenance costs will be higher, and replacement will occur earlier than proposal B. The initial cost for A will be $750,000. Heating and cooling costs will average $6000 per month with maintenance costs averaging $2000 per month. Minor remodeling will be required in years 5, 10, and 15 at a cost of $150,000 each time in order to render the units usable for 20 years. They will have no salvage value. Proposal B will include tailored design and construction costs of $1.1 million initially with estimated heating and cooling costs of $3000 per month and maintenance costs of $1000 per month. There will be no salvage value at the end of the 20-year life. Which proposal should…arrow_forwardJames, the plant manager at Global Foundries (GF), received estimates from two contractors to improve traffic flow and repave the parking areas at his production facility. Proposal A includes new curbs, grading, and paving at an initial cost of $250,000. The expected life of the parking lot surface is 4 years with annual costs for maintenance and repainting of strips of $3000. According to proposal B, the pavement has a higher quality and an expected life of 12 years. The annual maintenance cost will be negligible for the parking area, but the markings will have to be repainted every 2 years at a cost of $5000. The MARR is 12% per year. (a) How much can GF afford to spend on proposal B for the two proposals to break even? (b) Proposal B first cost came in at $700,000. Now, what is the breakeven initial cost for proposal A, if all other estimates are correct?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Valuation Analysis in Project Finance Models - DCF & IRR; Author: Financial modeling;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDlQPJaFtCw;License: Standard Youtube License