Concept explainers
In an experiment to compare two different surgical procedures for hernia repair (“A Single-Blinded, Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hernia Repair in Children,” Pediatrics [2009]: 332-336), 89 children were assigned at random to one of the two surgical methods. The researchers relied on the random assignment of subjects to treatments to create comparable groups with respect to extraneous variables that they did not control. One such extraneous variable was age.
After random assignment to treatments, the researchers looked at the age distribution of the children in each of the two experimental groups (laparoscopic repair [LR] and open repair [OR]). The accompanying figure is similar to one in the paper.
Based on this figure, has the random assignment of subjects to experimental groups been successful in creating groups that are similar with respect to the ages of the children in the groups? Explain.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 2 Solutions
Introduction To Statistics And Data Analysis
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Elementary Statistics Using Excel (6th Edition)
EBK STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES IN BUSINESS
Business Statistics: A First Course (8th Edition)
Applied Statistics in Business and Economics
Elementary Statistics ( 3rd International Edition ) Isbn:9781260092561
Developmental Mathematics (9th Edition)
- In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, children were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second dose, 116 of 651 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced fever as a side effect. After the second dose, 73 of 532 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced fever as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced fever as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the α=0.10 level of significance? #1 Find the test statistic for this hypothesis test.arrow_forwardElizon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., announced the results of its first human trial of NPI 32101, a topical form of its skin ointment. A total of 225 patients diagnosed with skin irritations were randomly divided into three groups as part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to test the effectiveness of the new topical cream. The first group received a 0.5% cream, the second group received a 1.0% cream, and the third group received a placebo. Groups were treated twice daily for a 6-week period. (a)What type of experimental design is this? (b)What is the control group for this study? (c)What is the factor that is set to predetermined levels? What is the treatment? (d)What does it mean for this study to be double-blind? (e)Identify the experimental units. (f)Draw a diagram to illustrate the design.arrow_forwardAn article from the American Journal of Public Health reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention targeted to Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay, bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). A representative sample of 254 such men was randomized to be in either the intervention group (n=152, with 141 ultimately participating in the study) or the control group (n=152, with 147 ulitmately participating in the study). The primary outcome under study getting tested for HIV within the six-months following group assignment (randomization) among those who had been sexually active in this same six-month follow-up period. At six months of follow-up, 141 subjects in the intervention group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since randomization. Of these 141 men, 114 had been tested for HIV since being randomized. At six months of follow-up, 147 subjects in the control group reported having had sex (with men…arrow_forward
- A study of “adverse symptoms” in users of over-the-counter pain relief medications assigned subjects at random toone of two common pain relievers: acetaminophen and ibuprofen. In all, 650 subjects took acetaminophen, and 44experienced some adverse symptom. Of the 347 subjects who took ibuprofen, 49 had an adverse symptom. Is thisconvincing evidence that the two pain relievers differ in the proportion of people who experience an adverse symptom?arrow_forwardIn its January 25, 2012, issue, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported on the effects of overconsumption of low, normal, and high protein diets on weight gain, energy expenditure, and body composition. Researchers conducted a single blind, randomized controlled trial of 25 U.S. adults. The subjects were healthy, weight-stable, male and female volunteers, aged 18 to 35 years. All subjects consumed a weight-stabilizing diet for 13 to 25 days. Afterwards, the researchers randomly assigned participants to diets containing various percentages of energy from protein: 5% (low protein), 15% (normal protein), or 25% (high protein). The subjects were not aware of the specific protein level diet to which they were assigned. On these diets the researchers overfed the participants during the last 8 weeks of their 10 to 12 week stay in the inpatient metabolic unit. The goal was to investigate the effect of overconsumption of protein on weight gain, energy expenditure, and body…arrow_forwardIn a randomized double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine children were randomly divided into two groups subjects in group one received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine after the second dose 112 of 690 subjects in the experimental group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect after the second dose 69 of 571 of the subjects in the control group 2 experienced drowsiness as a side effect does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experience drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at 0.05 level of significance? Determine the null and alternative hypothesis? find the test statistic for this hypothesis test? determine the P value for this hypothesis test? do we reject or not reject the null hypothesis and why? State your conclusion?arrow_forward
- In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second dose, 126 of 387 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second dose, 158 of 574 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the α=0.01 level of significance? Verify the model requirements. Select all that apply. A. The sample size is less than 5% of the population size for each sample. B. n1p11−p1≥10 and n2p21−p2≥10 C. The samples are dependent. D. The sample size is more than 5% of the population size for each sample. E. The samples are independent. F. The data come…arrow_forwardA random sample of 50 suspension helmets used by motorcycle riders and automobile race-car drivers was subjected to an impact test, and on 18 of these helmets some damage was observed.arrow_forwardIn a study of the effectiveness of a new device that supports a weak or damaged heart, 150 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs and surgery to install the new device. After two years, 60% of the 67 patients who received the device had improved and 40% of the patients who received the standard treatment had improved. Does this data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who recieved the experimental treatment who improved is higher than for the patients who received the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Use pexperimental − pstandard ).A) State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: pe − ps = 0, HA: pe − ps ≠ 0 H0: pe − ps = 0, HA: pe − ps < 0 H0: pe − ps = 0, HA: pe − ps > 0 B) Find the test statistic.z = C) What is the p-value?P-Value = D) State your conclusion in terms of…arrow_forward
- A study published in 2007 by Christopher Johnson, professor of music education and music therapy at the University of Kansas, revealed that students in elementary schools who took private music lessons scored around 20 percent higher in math scores on standardized tests, compared to students who did not take private music lessons. Is this a randomized experiment or an observational study? a) Randomized experiment, since researchers gave students standardized tests. b) Observational study, since whether the student took private music lessons was not randomly assigned. c) Observational study, since math scores were not randomly assigned. d) Observational study, since this was not a random sample.arrow_forwardThe article “Capillary Leak Syndrome in Children with C4A-Deficiency Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-Blind, Randomised Controlled Study” (S. Zhang, S. Wang, et al., Lancet, 2005:556–562) presents the results of a study of the effectiveness of giving blood plasma containing complement component C4A to pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass patients. Of 58 patients receiving C4A-rich plasma, the average length of hospital stay was 8.5 days and the standard deviation was 1.9 days. Of 58 patients receiving C4A-free plasma, the average length of hospital stay was 11.9 days and the standard deviation was 3.6 days. Can you conclude that the mean hospital stay is shorter for patients receiving C4A-rich plasma?arrow_forwardAnother experiment involving processor speed (Sp) and size of random access memory (RAM) for computers produced the following data Sp1 Sp2 RAM 1 48 37 38 35 37 39 RAM 2 30 35 31 22 26 30 Are the factors Sp and RAM or their interaction statistically significant?arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman