Reason for why positions of functional group present on a substrate is significant for specific binding to enzymes has to be explained briefly. Concept Introduction: Drugs: Drugs are molecules which are taken from an external source to change the normal functioning of the body. The action of drug is in molecular level and the design of many drugs are in such a way that it mimics a particular neurotransmitter or hormone. Drugs bind with receptors showing an increased or decreased effect. Receptors: Receptors is a molecule or a part of molecule which interacts with a neurotransmitter, a hormone or other molecules which are biochemically active so that a response is initiated in a target cell.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 32Q

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Reason for why positions of functional group present on a substrate is significant for specific binding to enzymes has to be explained briefly.

Concept Introduction:

Drugs: Drugs are molecules which are taken from an external source to change the normal functioning of the body. The action of drug is in molecular level and the design of many drugs are in such a way that it mimics a particular neurotransmitter or hormone. Drugs bind with receptors showing an increased or decreased effect.

Receptors: Receptors is a molecule or a part of molecule which interacts with a neurotransmitter, a hormone or other molecules which are biochemically active so that a response is initiated in a target cell.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Circle the correct answer in each sentence. Thus sugar is a (simple ; complex) carbohydrate. The linkage marked "a" is a (acetal ; hemiacetal ; acetyl ; hemiacetyl) linkage and is in the (alpha ; beta) configuration. The linkage marked "b" is a (acetal ; hemiacetal ; acetyl ; hemiacetyl) linkage.

Refer to the bar graph below, Explain why the n→π* interactions contributes more to the overall stabilization of the protein than all the other interactions(C-H-O hydrogen bond,π-π interactions, C5 Hydrogen Bonds, Cation-π interactions, Sulfur-arene interactions, Anion-π interactions, Chalcogen bonds, X-H-π interactions) even though n→π* is the weaker interaction. Explain why that's the case for EACH of the bonds. I.e Why n→π* interactions contribute more to the overall stabilization of the protein than C-H-O hydrogen bonds, even though n→π* is the weaker interaction. Why n→π* interactions contribute more to the overall stabilization of the protein than π-π interactions even though n→π* is the weaker interaction. Why n→π* interactions contribute more to the overall stabilization of the protein than C5 Hydrogen Bonds, even though n→π* is the weaker interaction. Why n→π* interactions contribute more to the overall stabilization of the protein than Cation-π interactions, even though…

CANNOT BE HAND DRAWN! Please help correct my work Determine if your molecule contains any chiral carbons. If there are chiral carbons in your molecule, circle or highlight all of them. If your molecule does not contain any chiral carbons explain why none of the carbons are chiral.